This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
1gangleri
Hi! Today I found Goethe-Institut and with search_author : Goethe Institut many others.
I added some relations and some links.
search_author : Library of Congress shows a lot of urls. Some of them:
Library of Congress.,
libraryofcongressarc:Library of Congress. Archive of Folk Culture
some names are looking very odd:
libraryofcongresswor::Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of
workinggrouponthefut::Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of
Question 1: What would be the best pattern to groupe / relate these urls?
Question 2: Who would like to clean thease authors?
Regards Reinhardt
P.S. It might be that "Touchstones" does not support minuses: Goethe-Institut generates a red link.
----
P.S.S: Here the broken urls:
http://www.librarything.com/author/libraryofcongressarc&norefer=1
http://www.librarything.com/author/libraryofcongresswor&norefer=1
http://www.librarything.com/author/workinggrouponthefut&norefer=1
I added some relations and some links.
search_author : Library of Congress shows a lot of urls. Some of them:
Library of Congress.,
libraryofcongressarc:Library of Congress. Archive of Folk Culture
some names are looking very odd:
libraryofcongresswor::Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of
workinggrouponthefut::Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of
Question 1: What would be the best pattern to groupe / relate these urls?
Question 2: Who would like to clean thease authors?
Regards Reinhardt
P.S. It might be that "Touchstones" does not support minuses: Goethe-Institut generates a red link.
----
P.S.S: Here the broken urls:
http://www.librarything.com/author/libraryofcongressarc&norefer=1
http://www.librarything.com/author/libraryofcongresswor&norefer=1
http://www.librarything.com/author/workinggrouponthefut&norefer=1
