HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Pagan Rome and the Early Christians

by Stephen Benko

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
971280,844 (2.5)None
As perceived by the average Roman citizen, the early rites and behavior of Christians laid them open to charges of cannibalism, immorality, and the practice of magic and conspiring and fomenting rebellion aganst the state. The early church fathers rejected these accusations and portrayed pagans as victims of misinformation or perpetrators of ill will. Benko proposes to give the pagans the benefit of the doubt and analyzes their charges against Christianity under the premise that they may have been right within the context of the times. He has provided a persuasively argued and refreshing -- if controversial -- perspective on the confrontation of the pagan and early Christian worlds.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Stephen Benko, in Pagan Rome and the Early Christians, took a unique, intriguing approach to writing the history of Christendom’s first three centuries. He asked the questions: how would the Roman culture have viewed this new faith within their own context. I admired his commitment to approaching the question that way.

Unfortunately, his execution was quite poor. Benko notes the common, well-documented views of early Christians: they were a secret sect, they had strange ceremonies, they were cannibals, they practiced sexual immorality in secret meetings. Benko explains, chapter-by-chapter, where a view like that would have come from in the society and time of the early church. So far, so good. But the author failed to measure those views against the evidence to ask if they were reasonable views, even within the context of the first century. He also failed to measure his selected evidence against the broad, and widely documented, counter evidence of a people who were reasonable, peaceful, loving, committed to each other and to their God—committed enough, in fact it undergo gruesome persecution and death.

Most illustrative of his poor methodology was a chapter entitled, “A Portrait of an Early Christian,” where Benko sketches the life of one Perigrineus Proteus who lived from 110-165. Proteus, suspected of killing his father for his inheritance, traveled to Palestine, found Christians, joined the church and became prominent within the early church there and eventually was imprisoned for his faith. In prison, his brother believers cared for his needs to an extent that some criticized him for enriching himself with their aid. Eventually, he was released and traveled around the churches, receiving aid because of his history of enduring persecution. “Something” turned the church against him and he was excommunicated from the body of early Christians, later becoming a cynic. Protheus later foretold his own death at the Olympic Games in 165. A year’s worth of speculation and gossip about his prophecy brought a large crowd to the games, and, not disappointing them, Protheus jumped into the flames and perished as he had foretold.

A reader would be justified, finishing the chapter, to wonder, “Why would the author spend so much time on this strange personality in a book about the early church?” The author himself admits, at the end of the chapter, “it would be far fetched to call Perigrineus a CHRISTIAN monastic.” (Emphasis the author’s.) Just so.

Some interesting details of early church history here, but not much else to recommend the book. ( )
  fathermurf | Oct 4, 2023 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (3)

As perceived by the average Roman citizen, the early rites and behavior of Christians laid them open to charges of cannibalism, immorality, and the practice of magic and conspiring and fomenting rebellion aganst the state. The early church fathers rejected these accusations and portrayed pagans as victims of misinformation or perpetrators of ill will. Benko proposes to give the pagans the benefit of the doubt and analyzes their charges against Christianity under the premise that they may have been right within the context of the times. He has provided a persuasively argued and refreshing -- if controversial -- perspective on the confrontation of the pagan and early Christian worlds.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (2.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 1
3.5
4
4.5
5

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 205,688,738 books! | Top bar: Always visible