By Night in Chile

Father Urrutia Lacroix is on his deathbed, confronting the "wizened youth" of his idealistic younger self, and ranting in a semi-confessional, desultory style that runs the entire book without pause. He relates his desire to write poetry and how that brought him into the circle of literary critic, Farewell, where he met many illustrious members of the literary intelligentsia, including Neruda. But Urrutia remained on the outside and eventually fell into a despondency broken only by an offer from two shady members of Opus Dei to travel Europe investigating ways to preserve the integrity of the Church. Upon his return he is drawn into a complicit relationship with the Chilean military junta, until he even he finds it hard to justify his show more actions.

By Night in Chile is a stinging indictment of the literary elite and their role as bystanders, if not contributors, to the terror that permeated Chile under Pinochet. Replete with references to literary figures ranging from Dante to Ernst Jünger, as well as Chilean historical personages, the novel is best read with easy access to the Internet. Bolaño also condemns the Catholic Church for being "the well in which the sins of Chile sink without a trace." His imagery of the priests of Europe using falcons to bring down the pigeons and even doves of the people they supposedly guide is chilling. In addition to it's intellectual interest, the novel is wonderfully written with lines that are both concise and illustrative. Impressive. show less

A great book to read while I myself was in a state of feverish delirium, picking it up, putting it down, finding myself totally adrift at times and fully lucid at others. I have not read Bolaño for many years, not since I was in my late teens (I'm 32 now), and the experience was very different. This time I felt I understood the fundamental absurdity of the Bolaño style: marrying literary critics, militant fascists, poets, and Marxism in a river of hallucinatory ramblings is a method so homogenous you kind of have to laugh. I think my younger self, knowing nothing about Latin America, probably just thought this was what they were like over there. But no, this is all the work of a totally sui generis imagination, one that questions the show more moral complicity of literature and philosophy with fascism. I know a lot of smart people think this is his best, and I did like it a lot more this time, but it didn't come close to moving me anywhere near as much as 2666 (which I have not read in many, many years now). Good to get back in touch with Big Bobby Bolaño. show less

His best? Not sure yet. It's certainly the funniest work I've read of his. There are some great comical scenes of the Father teaching Pinochet and his generals the basics of Marxism, as well as a dead-stop hilarious discussion of the merits and uses of literature between the Father and his literary critic friend, Farewell. His genius, I believe, is weaving this tragicomedy into the brief, recollected life. I was expecting to be annoyed by the deathbed flaneur conceit, but very early in the story I bought into the epic sentence 'confessions'...it worked, somehow. One expects this to be a thousand pages long, but he gives us only a fraction of the shit story, one hundred and thirty or so. I also like that he doesn't emphasize his anti show more style; in other words his style of writing reads as if he doesn't give a shit about style. But of course he does. I think.

I kick myself for not having the energy or focus to soak up more spanish and read him unfiltered... show less

The hallucinogenic confessions of a coward on his deathbed. That Father Urrutia is a stooge for Pinochet is just a symptom of the man's fundamental mediocrity: his cowardice extends to his very artistic soul. Urrutia is the academic elite who idolize the innovators of poetry and literature of the past but are too afraid to contribute to it. They neither challenge, change, adapt, innovate, or engage. In their inaction they are failures. They discuss politics in the abstract sense while prisoners are tortured literally underneath their feet. It's like Leni Riefenstahl who claimed ignorance of Hitler's agenda. How can a visionary play with the power art without understanding the consequences?

On his deathbed Urrutia realizes that he show more squandered his intellectual inheritance on the perceived safety of fascism. In his attempts to be above it all he is lowered beneath. A "wizened youth" looks on solemnly: perhaps this apparition is what Urrutia once was or perhaps it is what he was always too afraid to become. The man who wanted to be the next Neruda understands that the only thing he contributed to his country were birds of prey, imported from former dictatorships, intended to slaughter doves who shit on cathedrals. Now there is one hell of a metaphor. show less

One of the first things, or so it's often said - for instance, by Mario Vargas Llosa in last year's Nobel Prize lecture - that happens in a dictatorship is that the artists get silenced. All those brave painters, playwrights, poets and novelists who stand up against tyranny, whose works are distributed in secret on photocopies and are sung at secret gatherings, who are more powerful than a thousand bombs, and who get thanked as liberators once democracy returns...

Except is that really what happens? By night in Chile, that long period when Pinochet's fascists ruled, everything was silent according to Bolaño. Much like 2666, By Night In Chile seems almost an accusation against literature itself and its failures. We follow our narrator as show more he makes his deathbed confession, how he started as a young priest turned literature critic, as he learns from both fellow critics, from Opus Dei and from the fascist junta the importance of conservation, purity, loyalty, a world in which everything always remains what it is, where nobody questions anything. He praises the silence that dictatorship brought, when he finally gets to rise to prominence as both a Marxism expert to the junta and an eloquent appraiser of classical, eternal literature - since nothing new gets written about what's happening now. Afterwards, with Pinochet gone, everyone talks about how they resisted, but our narrator, who maintains his innocence right up to the end, was there and he didn't see it. While they gathered in secret rooms and whispered of their independence, people were tortured. In silence. Literature didn't change anything (he writes in his novel).

Bolaño's roots seem less South American and more central European - there are parts of By Night In Chile where it feels like I'm reading one of the latter-day East bloc satirists, especially Hrabal comes to mind. He's both funny and desperately, bitterly furious. It's not the masterpiece that 2666 is; the characters are a little too sketchy, and there are a few ideas (for instance, naming the Opus Dei representatives Raef and Etah) that feel a bit too on the nose. But on a whole, it's a dark little bitter pill of a book, at 150 pages just thin enough to sneak in the next time we get a little too self-congratulatory about how we made the world better today. show less

Sebastian Urrutia Lacroix, a failed priest, literary critic, and occasional poet, is dying. In a long and rambling deathbed confession, Urrutia looks back over the achievements and shortcomings in his life with an increasingly shaky grasp of reality. His memories, which range from the specific (meetings with Pablo Neruda, teaching Marxist philosophy to Augusto Pinochet) to the fantastic (engaging in falconry with European clergymen), come tumbling out in a stream-of-consciousness style as his end draws nearer. Throughout the narrative, Urrutia takes a decidedly defensive tone as he attempts to justify his actions to the unseen “wizened youth” who sits in judgment.

Although brief in length, this is a deceptively complex novel. It can show more be read as either a straightforward tale of one man’s final thoughts before passing away or as an allegorical and political history of the author’s native land of Chile. It is no secret that Bolaño’s sentiments ran contrary to those of the military dictatorship that controlled the country for many years—in fact, he spent time in jail under the Pinochet regime—and that attitutde of dissent is evident throughout the entire book. However, the story can also be seen as an indictment of the community of Chilean artists and writers that turned a blind eye toward the repression happening around them during that terrible time.

By Night in Chile is not as well known nor as well received as the author’s longer works of fiction (The Savage Detectives, 2666), but that should not dissuade potential readers. Bolaño was a marvelous writer and his talents for stylistic innovation (e.g., the entire story is essentially told in a single paragraph stretching to more than 100 pages) and insights into social conventions and human nature are on full display here. His prose is at once challenging, thought provoking, and profoundly moving, which is a most generous reward for the effort it takes to read it. show less

In this slim book, Bolaño manages to attack everything from the literati to religion, from politics to dissident desires, from memory and its unreliability to flat-out fabrications and historical inconsistencies.

The narrative voice here is really the technical vehicle that navigates the reader, and it's at this that Bolaño succeeds in such a wonderfully brilliant and uncharted way. While at times reminiscent of Dostoevsky's Underground Man or Camus's Clamence, or perhaps the comparison is solely rooted in the motif of confession, Bolaño's Urrutia is a literary, religious, political, and existential crisis all his own.