Course in General Linguistics (Open Court Classics)

by Ferdinand de Saussure

On This Page

Description

This new edition of Ferdinand de Saussure's Course in General Linguistics (1916) is the first critical edition of Saussure to appear in English. It also restores Wade Baskin's delightful original English translation (1959), which has long been unavailable. The founder of modern linguistics, Saussure inaugurated semiology, structuralism, and deconstruction and made possible the work of Jacques Lacan, French feminism, cultural studies, New Historicism, and postcolonialism. Based on the show more lectures that Saussure gave at the end of his life at the University of Geneva, the text of th show less

Tags

Recommendations

Member Recommendations

Member Reviews

12 reviews
For literary critic, author, and professor Terry Eagleton, Structuralism is "rather like killing a person in order to examine more conveniently the circulation of the blood" ([b:Literary Theory: An Introduction|16939|Literary Theory An Introduction|Terry Eagleton|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1429361191s/16939.jpg|2454022], 95), and indeed Roland Barthes had something like this analogy in mind when he wrote the monumental little essay "The Death of the Author." As Mary Klages defines it, "In any field, a structuralist is interested in discovering the elements - the units - that make up any system, and in discovering the rules that govern how those units can be combined. And that's all" ([b:Literary Theory: A Guide for the show more Perplexed|771189|Literary Theory A Guide for the Perplexed|Mary Klages|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1347401535s/771189.jpg|757247], 31). For those of us far removed from the Russian formalists and the compiled lectures of Saussure, captivated as we are with the magic of literature, these aforementioned definitions must be borne in mind to keep a hold on Saussure's project.

Saussure is interested in bringing the field of linguistics up to a scientific standard. Taking cues from the historical progression of linguistics (from the Greeks' logical system of grammar to comparative literature to the Neogrammarians), he seeks to outline a rigorous discipline for the science of a language. Language, in his view, is composed of, at base, linguistic signs. These signs are themselves composed of a concept (signified) and a sound pattern (signifier). Here we see the foundation of the Structuralist mode: reductivism; hence, we're dealing with phonemes and morphemes which send or receive a concept/image. A crucial rule with these linguistic signs is that they have negative meaning--meaning, they have a specific correct meaning because they have not the meaning of other signs.

In terms of using the Structuralist mode to perform literary criticism, one would distill the text down to its most basic parts: again, down to the phonemes. What about the content, the story? Unnecessary. What about the author? Irrelevant. I cannot think of a single useful application of the Structuralist methodology in literary criticism that does not lead to the content or the author in some way except perhaps to yield the underlying symbols of the text. And still: now what? But, to be fair to Saussure's considerable work, we must bear in mind that his goal was linguistics, not literary criticism. In his own (or his students') words, at the close of this critical book: "...the only true object of study in linguistics is the language, considered in itself and for its own sake" (230).
show less
This is a linguistics classic and a must-read for anyone wanting to delve into the history of linguistics. Just to be sure, however, this is a collection of notes from his course painstakingly collected into this volume by his students. The notes are based on a series of lectures, so it doesn't really read so much like a textbook.

If you're looking for a more specific understanding of general linguistics as the field stands today, I recommend picking up a contemporary introductory text and reading this after you've got a basic grounding in linguistics terms and concepts.
Basado en notas de su cátedra, correspondientes a los tres cursos sobre lingüística general dictados en 1906-1907, 1908-1909 y 1910-1911, cursos desarrollados en la Universidad de Ginebra, tras suceder a Jospeh Wertheimer en 1906. El texto es una reconstrucción hecha por sus alumnos, basándose particularmente en el último de los tres cursos y las notas recuperadas del maestro.
Edition: // Descr: xvi, 240 p. 21.5 cm. // Series: Call No. { } Shelved in Kade German Center, 116 Lawrence : Sprachunterricht // //
Come faccio a non mettere nella mia biblioteca digitale anche questo testo che mi riporta indietro nel tempo. Un tempo opportunamente "ritrovato" in maniera digitale, ma io l'ho "conosciuto" in maniera cartacea. Deve essere ancora da qualche parte, su in mansarda, questo libro sul quale, la mia "metà del cielo" ed io,abbiamo sgobbato negli anni universitari. La linguistica, Mamma di tutti i media passati, presenti e futuri: fonetica, fonologia,glottologia, filologia, etimologia, figlie e figli di Babele ...

Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) è considerato il padre della linguistica moderna. La sua opera più importante, Corso di linguistica generale, pubblicata postuma nel 1916, ha avuto un impatto profondo sul modo di concepire la show more lingua. Il Corso è un'opera complessa e ricca di idee innovative. Tra queste, le più importanti sono:

La distinzione tra langue e parole. La langue è il sistema linguistico in generale, mentre la parole è l'uso individuale della lingua. Saussure sostiene che la langue è il vero oggetto di studio della linguistica, poiché è il sistema che dà forma alla parole.

La natura arbitraria del segno linguistico. Saussure sostiene che il rapporto tra significante (il suono o la sequenza di segni grafici che rappresentano una parola) e significato (il concetto a cui la parola si riferisce) è arbitrario. Questo significa che non esiste un legame naturale tra il significante e il significato, ma che è stabilito dalla convenzione sociale.

La natura sistematica della lingua. Saussure sostiene che la lingua è un sistema complesso di elementi interconnessi. Ogni elemento della lingua ha un significato solo in relazione agli altri elementi del sistema.
Queste idee hanno rivoluzionato il modo di concepire la lingua. Prima di Saussure, la linguistica era principalmente interessata allo studio dell'evoluzione storica delle lingue. Il Corso ha invece spostato l'attenzione sull'analisi dei sistemi linguistici in sé e per sé.

Le idee di Saussure hanno avuto un impatto profondo su tutta la linguistica moderna. Hanno contribuito allo sviluppo dello strutturalismo, una corrente di pensiero che ha dominato la linguistica nel XX secolo. Hanno inoltre influenzato altre discipline, come la semiotica, la psicologia cognitiva e la filosofia del linguaggio.

Il Corso di linguistica generale è un'opera fondamentale per chiunque voglia comprendere la natura della lingua e il suo ruolo nella società.
show less

Members

Recently Added By

Author Information

Picture of author.
31+ Works 2,067 Members

Some Editions

Albert Riedlinger (Contributor)
Alonso, Amado (Translator)
Alonso, Amado (Translator)
De Mauro, Tullio (Translator)

Awards and Honors

Series

Belongs to Publisher Series

Common Knowledge

Canonical title*
Curso de lingüística general
Original title
Cours de linguistique générale
Alternate titles
Course in General Linguistics
Original publication date
1916
First words
Saussure's Cours de linguistique générale occupies a place of unique importance in the history of Western thinking about man in society. It is a key text not only within the development of linguistics but also i... (show all)n the formation of that broader intellectual movement of the twentieth century known as ‘structuralism’. With the sole exception of Wittgenstein, no thinker has had a profound an influence on the modern view of homo loquens as Saussure.
[From Roy Harris' "Translator's Introduction" (1986/1997: [ix])]
Ferdinand de Saussure's criticism of the inadequate tenets and methods characteristic of the linguistics which prevailed during the period of his own intellectual development we heard from his own lips on many occasions.... (show all) All his life he pursued a determined search for guiding principles to direct the course of his thinking through that chaos. But it was not until 1906, when he had succeeded Joseph Wertheimer at the University of Geneva, that he was able to expound his own views. They were the mature product of many years' reflexion. He gave three courses of lectures on general linguistics, in 1906–1907, 1908–1909, and 1910–1911. The requirements of the curriculum, however, obliged him to devote half of each course to a historical and descriptive survey of the Indo-European languages, and the essential core of his subject was thus considerably reduced.
[From Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye's "Preface to the First Edition" (1916/1997: [xvii])]
The science which has grown up around linguistic facts passed through three successive phases before coming to terms with its one and only true object of study.
[From "A Brief Survey of the History of Linguistics", chapt... (show all)er 1 of Ferdinand de Saussure's Course in General Linguistics (1916/1997: [1])]
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)From the excursions made above into regions bordering upon linguistics, there emerges a negative lesson, but one which is all the more interesting in that it supports the fundamental thesis of this course: the only true object of study in linguistics is the language, considered in itself and for its own sake.
[From "Language Families and Linguistic Types", chapter V of Ferdinand de Saussure's Course in General Linguistics (1916/1997: 230)]
Original language
French
*Some information comes from Common Knowledge in other languages. Click "Edit" for more information.

Classifications

Genres
Nonfiction, Philosophy, Literature Studies and Criticism, General Nonfiction
DDC/MDS
410LanguageLinguisticsLinguistics
LCC
P121 .S363Language and LiteraturePhilology. LinguisticsLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarScience of language (Linguistics)
BISAC

Statistics

Members
1,943
Popularity
10,980
Reviews
11
Rating
(3.87)
Languages
16 — Catalan, Chinese, Czech, English, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Korean, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Portuguese (Portugal), Portuguese (Brazil)
Media
Paper, Audiobook, Ebook
ISBNs
81
ASINs
25