Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama

Typical Coulter, preaching to the choir, but good singing. A good account of race relations and race-based hucksterism.

Американската политика и обществен живот са в огромна степен повлияни от наследството на робовладелската институция, която просъществува там най-дълго от целия цивилизован свят. И днес американското обшество и политика не само не са загърбили противопоставянето на тема раса, но дори го задълбочават още повече, понеже за някои хора това носи гласове на изборите.

А губещи са всички останали хора, най-вече show more самите негри, които вместо да вървят напред и да гледат в бъдещето, колективно са се вторачили в миналото и търсят не развитие, а възмездие - от общество, което е поколения далеч от някогашните робовладелци. Нещо подобно на нашите цигани, които вместо да пращат децата си на училище, реват че са дискриминирани когато се наложи да си плащат тока.

В настоящата книга Ан Коултър дава безбройни примери за това как политиците (главно от Демократическата партия - американските социалисти) използват тези сантименти на негрите и съзнателно и усилено ги задълбочават, за да спечелят лесни гласове срещу кебапчета (на английски му викат pork barrels или само pork но значението е същото).

Трите звездички са защото книгата не е толкова идейна, колкото фактологическа - кой какво и кога казал, което не е толкова интересно. show less

"You start out in 1954 by saying, �E€ENigger, nigger, nigger.E€E By 1968 you canE€Et say E€EniggerE€EE€Ethat hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, statesE€E rights, and all that stuff, and youE€Ere getting so abstract. Now, youE€Ere talking about cutting taxes, and all these things youE€Ere talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whitesE€¦ E€EWe want to cut this,E€E is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than E€ENigger, nigger."he American] voter, in my show more judgment, will be more likely to vote his economic interests than he will anything else. And that is the voter that I think through a fairly slow but very steady process, will go Republican [...] the real issues ultimately will be the economic issues [...] statistically, as the number of non-producers in the system moves toward fifty percent."

-Lee Atwater, Republican Politician, Campaign Strategist for Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. Died of a brain tumor in 1991. (Full audio of interview can be found here.)

In this 41 minute interview, Lee Atwater, the ancestor of Boss Karl Rove, details the Republican campaign strategies as he saw them from the inside. His remarks are eerily prescient, even almost echoing Mitt Romney's 47% gaffe last year. (He got 47.2% of the vote, in another coincidence.)

Now I am well aware Ann Coulter is unpleasant reading for anybody to the left of Joseph McCarthy. But only a brief summary of her hypothesis and the few chapters I skimmed were all consistently bad and physically revolting. After such repeated evidence to the contrary, after 95% of black voters went Democrat in 2012, 75% of Latinos, and 70% of Asians, after the racism of the Tea Party was beaten so soundly, how could you not realize that racial politics are now firmly slanted against the Republican policies, and that blaming the minorities in question is not a feasible way to gain votes? How the desperate claims of one pundit saying, "We're not racist," are drowned out by the masses of racist Tea Party furor?

Could anyone explain to me how such persistent untruth is sold, how vast media enterprises have inundated large segments of the American people with this dreck, promising such big lies about history? Is it spite? Hatred? Fear? hhis nation changed forever show less