Plurality of Worlds: The Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant
by Steven J. Dick
On This Page
Description
This is a fascinating history of the debate over the question of extraterrestrial life from Classical Greece to the mid-eighteenth century. Using many primary and secondary sources, this book analyses why such great thinkers as Aristotle, Aquinas, Ockham, Galileo, Kepler, Huygens, and Kant thought the debate over the plurality of worlds a subject for serious discussion. The author shows how conflicting arguments from science, philosophy, and theology gradually converged to the same opinion - show more that intelligent life must fill the universe. show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Recommendations
Member Reviews
This is a belated follow-up to Crowe's The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750-1900 which I read back in '14. Compared to that massive tome, this is a brief and breezy work; I finished it in a couple of days. Perhaps one day I'll get around to also reading Dick's book about the twentieth century debate.
Chronologically, this book may be considered a bit loopsided; the ancient and medieval periods get one chapter each, while the remaining four chapters and the bulk of the conclusion are dedicated to the period from the middle of the sixteenth century to the middle of the eighteenth.
In its original, ancient form, the question about whether there is a "plurality of worlds" meant whether there are, somewhere far beyond the starry heavens, show more other Ptolemaic cosmoses, or whether ours is the only one. The period from Copernicus to Kant may be loosely characterized as that when it morphed into what we consider the question of extraterrestrial life - is there life on other planets within the visible universe, or is Earth unique?
Well worth a read if one is interested in intellectual and scientific history. That it's nearing forty years old makes little difference except that Dick's statement that we still don't know for sure whether there are planets orbiting other suns is of course outdated. show less
Chronologically, this book may be considered a bit loopsided; the ancient and medieval periods get one chapter each, while the remaining four chapters and the bulk of the conclusion are dedicated to the period from the middle of the sixteenth century to the middle of the eighteenth.
In its original, ancient form, the question about whether there is a "plurality of worlds" meant whether there are, somewhere far beyond the starry heavens, show more other Ptolemaic cosmoses, or whether ours is the only one. The period from Copernicus to Kant may be loosely characterized as that when it morphed into what we consider the question of extraterrestrial life - is there life on other planets within the visible universe, or is Earth unique?
Well worth a read if one is interested in intellectual and scientific history. That it's nearing forty years old makes little difference except that Dick's statement that we still don't know for sure whether there are planets orbiting other suns is of course outdated. show less
Members
- Recently Added By
Author Information
Common Knowledge
- Original language
- English
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 20
- Popularity
- 1,281,874
- Reviews
- 1
- Languages
- English
- Media
- Paper
- ISBNs
- 2






















































