HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

The Split History of the Women's Suffrage Movement: A Perspectives Flip Book (Perspectives Flip Books)

by Don Nardo

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
1611,307,817 (4.5)None
"Describes the opposing viewpoints of women's suffragists and anti-suffragists in the United States beginning in the mid-19th century"--
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

In the meeting of the womens rights movements, there were less than 300 people attended. There was a women named Lydia taft, she was wealthy in a town in mascheussteues, she was aloud to vote. In the years 1776 and 1807, women were aloud to vote in New Jersey if you had some amount of property. In the states there were 3 smart, brave women. Lucretia, Elizabeth, and Carl were one of the ladies who attempted to change the organization in the states. They felt it was unfair to have fewer rights than men. They also knew that they didnt desire these rights to earn political power. They believed thhat they could improve womens access to higher education. One day 250 women showed up for a meeting. Even 40 men. The meaning was about the equality with men and women. They hoped to see female suffarge become a reality of their life time, but it didnt. When war ended in 1865, there were still some women decided to resume to their struggles for their rights. In 1869, it was confirmed that black men were citizens, but still women didnt get any rights. in 1870, all men citizens, all colors, guranteed suffarge. Still. Women didn't get any rights. All the states were all free to restrict women from voting. They was this women named paul who was thrown in jail. There was bright light around to keep her from sleeping. She wasn't serverd food but she wouldnt eat. When this wouldnt work. They shoved a tube down her throat and pured liquids in her. All these tortures, Paul still wouldnt give in. When newspapers found out what was going on, the public was outrage. in 1920, women were fianlly aloud to vote. Without women risking lives and being brave, we may not have won the right to vote. Today, many people take that right for granted. There were a lot of women who put there lives out there so women could have the freedom women have today.

I really thought this book was really inspiring. :) I like it. ( )
  emmad.B2 | Mar 21, 2018 |
no reviews | add a review

Belongs to Series

You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

"Describes the opposing viewpoints of women's suffragists and anti-suffragists in the United States beginning in the mid-19th century"--

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5 1
5

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 205,460,402 books! | Top bar: Always visible