Sentience and Sensibility: A Conversation about Moral Philosophy
by Matthew R. Silliman
On This Page
Description
Sentience and Sensibility is a dialogue that engages a number of issues in moral theory in a rigorous and original manner, while remaining accessible to students and other nonspecialist readers.Tags
Member Reviews
David Gordon, Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Silliman (philosophy, Massachusetts Coll. of Liberal Arts) presents an engaging introduction to moral philosophy written in the form of a dialog between “Manuel Kant” and “Harriet Taylor.” These characters develop a theory of value incrementalism according to which the value of an object depends on how far it has progressed toward self-consciousness. Thus, plants are more valuable than stones, lower animals are more valuable than plants, and higher animals are more valuable than lower animals. Human beings, with full self-consciousness, rank highest. Silliman does not mean by this that humans have no duties to entities lower on the scale; to the contrary, he believes everything show more has “moral considerability” as its level of complexity warrants. Working from this theory, Silliman discusses abortion, environmentalism, and vegetarianism. He posits that morality is based on human sentiments-it is not “out there in the world” completely independent of human beings. By no means, though, does this imply moral relativism. Valuable supplementary reading in courses on ethics; recommended for larger collections. show less
Silliman (philosophy, Massachusetts Coll. of Liberal Arts) presents an engaging introduction to moral philosophy written in the form of a dialog between “Manuel Kant” and “Harriet Taylor.” These characters develop a theory of value incrementalism according to which the value of an object depends on how far it has progressed toward self-consciousness. Thus, plants are more valuable than stones, lower animals are more valuable than plants, and higher animals are more valuable than lower animals. Human beings, with full self-consciousness, rank highest. Silliman does not mean by this that humans have no duties to entities lower on the scale; to the contrary, he believes everything show more has “moral considerability” as its level of complexity warrants. Working from this theory, Silliman discusses abortion, environmentalism, and vegetarianism. He posits that morality is based on human sentiments-it is not “out there in the world” completely independent of human beings. By no means, though, does this imply moral relativism. Valuable supplementary reading in courses on ethics; recommended for larger collections. show less
Ratings
Members
- Recently Added By
Author Information
Awards and Honors
Common Knowledge
- Original publication date
- 2006
- People/Characters
- Aristotle, 384-322; Descartes, René, 1596-1650; Hume, David, 1711-1776; Hobbes, Thomas, 1588-1679; Thomas Nagel; Plato, ca. 428-347 BC (show all 9); Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804; Socrates; Jean-Paul Sartre
- Last words
- (Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)HARRIET: I know that, and I did say I would think about it, Manuel.
MANUEL: More than that, my friend, I could never ask of you. - Blurbers
- Lachs, John; Weissman, David; Warren, Mary Anne
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 9
- Popularity
- 2,302,852
- Reviews
- 1
- Rating
- (4.00)
- Languages
- English
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 3


