When I found out that John Boorman once published a novelization of his movie Zardoz (a film I cannot but class as "feel-good" and downright precious in its bungling of Deep Themes and Substance), I simply had to read it. I kind of wish I hadn't now: its clumsy pretention and not-quite-sensical pseudo-philosophy just aren't as entertaining without the visuals. It's really only of marginal interest for fans of the movie. ( )

The novel version of the 1974 film Zardoz, written by the same person who wrote and directed the film itself.

Zardoz has, I think, something of a reputation as an inexplicable bit of baffling weirdness. But when I watched the movie, decades after it was made, the main feeling I had about it was a sense of familiarity. I read a lot of 1970s science fiction in my youth, and a lot of it felt exactly like this: pseudo-profound and slightly surreal and entirely too obsessed with sex. The whole thing made me feel oddly nostalgic.

So when I saw the book version at a library sale a while back, I thought it might be fun to revisit it in this form. Maybe I'd feel some sense of nostalgia for my nostalgia.

But, eh. It's not an awful example of the kind of thing it is, but it's not great, either. Also, the kind of thing it is hasn't aged very well, and my nostalgia does have some limits. Even though it's only about 130 pages long, I was getting tired of it by the end. The simple truth is, it's just not nearly as entertaining when you can't see Sean Connery running around in that, erm, highly memorable costume. ( )

Like Arthur C. Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey, John Boorman's book Zardoz has a complex, complementary relationship with the film of the same name. Although composed after the film, it also incorporated features from earlier drafts by the filmmaker/author and is far from a mere "novelization." In his preface, Boorman characterizes the book as "an interpretation of the film" as well as something of an exorcism to address the spirits which possessed him to write, produce, and direct the movie in the first place.

There is no real difference in plot, character, or theme between the movie and the book. The book omits the film's prologue from Arthur Frayn, replacing it with a glimpse of the initial activation of the Tabernacle. And it affords a little more detail regarding the protagonist Zed's history, experiences, and intentions. In both media the story is set in 2293 on an Earth that has long suffered a complete division between a cloistered superhuman elite of Immortals dwelling in hidden Vortexes on the one hand, and a post-apocalyptic remnant of Brutal humanity inhabiting poisoned Outlands on the other. Zardoz is the story of a Brutal's invasion of a Vortex.

In terms drawn from ancient Gnosticism, we can consider the Immortal Arthur Frayn (a.k.a. Zardoz) to be a Demiurge, a duplicitous "architect" god-magician who creates among the Brutals a race of Exterminators culminating in its messiah Zed. ("Zed" is the English for omega, the last letter of the Greek alphabet. See Rev. 22:13.) Zardoz deliberately disillusions Zed with an exposure of his own falsity, driving Zed to seek the Unknown God in the Vortex, where the Immortals are in the role of Gnostic archons. They are emanations of the Pleroma, the ultimate divinity in the Tabernacle. By the end of the story, though, these valuations have been reversed: the Vortex is in fact a prison-world with the Tabernacle as its Demiurge. The Immortals have been condemned to degrade eventually into inert Apathetics or self-hating Renegades, without ever being allowed to die. Zed is their deliverer, and the bearer of a spark that can regenerate this corrupt race of deluded pseudo-gods.

Zed at one point cites and quotes Nietzsche: "He who fights too long against dragons, becomes himself a dragon" (110). And this bit of philosophical name-dropping has more than a little relationship to the larger themes of the story. Nietzsche notoriously remarks, "God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? ... Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?" (The Gay Science §125) The death of God is enacted in various ways throughout Zardoz: Zed's religious disillusionment, the murder of Arthur Frayn, the destruction of the Tabernacle, the slaying of the Immortals, and the fall of the Zardoz head. Zed is himself a Nietzschean overman: "a mutant. A second, maybe third generation. Therefore genetically stable ... mentally and physically vastly superior ..." (60-1). He must overcome his role as a Brutal, and the Immortals must go under for life to be renewed.

The Übermensch Zed was produced through the experimental artistry of Arthur/Zardoz. The murderous cruelty of the Exterminators is central to the program to create a "slave who could free his masters" (124). But within the Vortex, although they first view the Brutal Zed as a mere animal, there are no slaves or masters. The Immortals are the "last men" whom Nietzsche's Zarathustra anticipates with horror: "No shepherd, and one herd!" Their constant, technologically-mediated plebiscites enforce an emotional uniformity. "People still fall out, but are soon reconciled—otherwise it spoileth their stomachs" (Thus Spake Zarathustra, prologue §5). For all of their vaunted longevity (not really immortality in the end), the Vortex inhabitants do not value or promote "life" in the Nietzschean sense, and it is left to the Exterminator Zed to declare, "This place is against life" (93).

Vortex society seems more congenial to homoerotic relationships (May and Consuella, Friend and Arthur) than to heteroerotic ones. Procreation has been abandoned long ago. When confronted with the fact that "Eternals ... discovered that erection was impossible [for them] to achieve," overman Zed is aghast at their estrangement from "their true selves" (56).

Both book and movie refer to other Vortexes -- the one invaded by Zed is Vortex Four. Some of these Vortexes are on paths of interstellar colonization, which was supposed to have been an original motive for developing the technology of the Tabernacle. But the other Vortexes are disregarded in the end, presumed to be equally ill-fated. The social and psychological mechanisms of the system provoke pathologies of compliance (the Apathetics) and resistance (the Renegades), which eventually deplete the productive population to the point of failure. Vortex Four does not merely fail, though; it is sacrificed. Ultimately, Zardoz is Jesus (second time as farce) as Arthur Frayn embraces his own execution, and that of most of his peers, in order to promote a new form of life: their resurrection in the line of Zed.

Postscript: Only much later it comes to me that the term Vortex is the Fourierist Tourbillon! Boorman's troubled utopia is a technologically catalyzed phalanx, instituting Harmony within its bubble, while letting the larger world descend from Civilization to Savagery. This attempted isolation is what dooms it, "for they have sealed up the Pylon with blood, lest the Angel of Death should enter therein. Thus do they shut themselves off from the company of the saints. Thus do they keep themselves from compassion and from understanding" (Liber CDXVIII, 12th Aethyr). The laws of attraction demand that association communicates itself to the universe. Isolated, it mutates into a decrepitude that must deconstruct itself through the instrument of Zed: "This place is against life" (93).

This is a book based on a movie, I think. If the book came first, I've never seen it. The movie starred Sean Connery & was good, but it's dated. I give it 4 stars because it came up with some original stuff for the time, including quantum computing & cloning. ( )

Watched the film over 20 years ago, but wasn't particularly impressed. Then circumstances lead me to picking up a reading copy whilst on holiday in Cornwall a few years back; and so, on a damp dreary August day I started reading... Suddenly everything was revealed and something just clicked! I was spellbound and unable to put it down! I still can't believe how much I enjoyed this book.
As soon as I got back I wasted no time in tracking down the DVD. The film was much, much better than I remembered it (although I wish they hadn’t added that silly intro at the start!).
The story is crying out for someone to remake a big budget special effects version of the film sometime in the future - and rake in the fortunes of such an original storyline! Hope I get to see a new version someday. Like Logan's Run a film in need of a remake! ( )