HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Marriage and Caste in America: Separate and Unequal Families in a Post-Marital Age

by Kay S. Hymowitz

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
391637,261 (4.5)None
A generation ago Americans undertook a revolutionary experiment to redefine marriage. Where historically men and women had sought a loving bond, largely centered on the rearing of children, the new arrangement called for an intimate--and provisional--union of two adults. Now, as Kay Hymowitz argues in Marriage and Caste in America, the results of this experiment separating marriage from childrearing are in, and they turn out to be bad news not only for children but also, in ways little understood, for the country as a whole. The family revolution has played a central role in a growing inequality and high rates of poverty, even during economic good times. The family upheaval has hit African-Americans especially hard, Ms. Hymowitz shows, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan had famously predicted it would. While for decades feminists and academics toyed with the myth of the strong single black mother supported by kinship networks, black men drifted into fatherhood without being husbands, without even becoming part of a family, while black children were left behind. When Americans began their family revolution, they forgot to consider what American marriage was designed to do: it ordered lives by giving the young a meaningful life script. It supported middle-class foresight, planning, and self-sufficiency. And it organized men and women around "The Mission"--nurturing their children's cognitive, emotional, and physical development. More than anything, Ms. Hymowitz writes, it is The Mission that separates middle-class kids--who for all their overscheduling are doing very well indeed--from their less-parented and lower-achieving peers. In fact our great family experiment threatens to turn what the founders imagined as an opportunity-rich republic of equal citizens into a hereditary caste society.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

I hesitate to give this five stars because I feel that, unless you are highly engrossed in the topic, the book would seem fairly dry. Cue Nat King Cole... Also, I felt her Feminism chapter lacked some comments that would have enhanced its value-- See [b:Homeward Bound: Why Women are Embracing the New Domesticity|15803153|Homeward Bound Why Women are Embracing the New Domesticity|Emily Matchar|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1364805521s/15803153.jpg|21526281]. But, at the same time, I especially felt like the last chapter of the book did research that Leavitt and his friends ignored in [b:Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything|1202|Freakonomics A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything (Freakonomics, #1)|Steven D. Levitt|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1327909092s/1202.jpg|5397].

The title also bothers me. I don't like to think that there are castes in America. For obvious reasons. But this book and this year's experience have taught me differently. However, I also find her commentary on the American economy in her Feminism and concluding chapter to be most enlightening on that subject as well.

And now, let me address 3 conclusions you might jump to if you judge this book by its cover.

1: This book is religious.
Religious this is not. Hymowitz clearly stipulates in the beginning that she is not religious. And that, apart from a couple of mentions of religious culture being a "cause" of marital expectations in history, was basically that. No- this is not a religious commentary. But that didn't keep me from projecting my personal religious beliefs on her thoughts.

2. This book doesn't provide any new information.
Maybe-- but that depends on the studies you've read. I would say that this book provides a view of the benefits of families from the children's point of view. Too many studies, and the "why" behind this is addressed as well, only focus on the couple-- leaving the children completely out of the situation. But this reverses the trend. I would have liked her to write about the abuse problem a little bit more. But then this is me with the #MeToo movement still making headlines.

3: ONLY READ THIS PARAGRAPH IF YOU KNOW ME
This book blames race/is racist.
Again, I would say no. If anything, this book points to culture as it was in 1850-60 America as a large obstacle in surmounting poverty today. To be sure, Hymowitz looks specifically at inner city families, the uneven numbers that fill our jails, etc. But she also spends time looking at immigrants and their struggles. Her focus is poverty, the inequality that it brings, and its elimination.* If I've interpreted the topic incorrectly, let me know (because I honestly didn't mean to offend or misread).


*I read an article the other day about inter-generational PTSD that also seemed to tie in. ( )
  OutOfTheBestBooks | Sep 24, 2021 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (2)

A generation ago Americans undertook a revolutionary experiment to redefine marriage. Where historically men and women had sought a loving bond, largely centered on the rearing of children, the new arrangement called for an intimate--and provisional--union of two adults. Now, as Kay Hymowitz argues in Marriage and Caste in America, the results of this experiment separating marriage from childrearing are in, and they turn out to be bad news not only for children but also, in ways little understood, for the country as a whole. The family revolution has played a central role in a growing inequality and high rates of poverty, even during economic good times. The family upheaval has hit African-Americans especially hard, Ms. Hymowitz shows, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan had famously predicted it would. While for decades feminists and academics toyed with the myth of the strong single black mother supported by kinship networks, black men drifted into fatherhood without being husbands, without even becoming part of a family, while black children were left behind. When Americans began their family revolution, they forgot to consider what American marriage was designed to do: it ordered lives by giving the young a meaningful life script. It supported middle-class foresight, planning, and self-sufficiency. And it organized men and women around "The Mission"--nurturing their children's cognitive, emotional, and physical development. More than anything, Ms. Hymowitz writes, it is The Mission that separates middle-class kids--who for all their overscheduling are doing very well indeed--from their less-parented and lower-achieving peers. In fact our great family experiment threatens to turn what the founders imagined as an opportunity-rich republic of equal citizens into a hereditary caste society.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 1
4.5
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 205,354,672 books! | Top bar: Always visible