HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

by Vincent BUGLIOSI

Other authors: John F. KENNEDY (Associated Name)

Other authors: See the other authors section.

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
376767,232 (4.23)27
Polls reveal that over 75 percent of Americans believe there was a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald; some even believe Oswald was entirely innocent. In this absorbing and historic book--the first ever to cover the entire case--Vincent Bugliosi shows how we have come to believe such lies about an event that changed the course of history. Bugliosi is perhaps the only man in America capable of "prosecuting" Oswald for the murder of President Kennedy. His book is a narrative compendium of fact, forensic evidence, reexamination of key witnesses, and common sense. Every detail and nuance is accounted for, every conspiracy theory revealed as a fraud upon the American public. Bugliosi's irresistible logic, command of the evidence, and ability to draw startling inferences shed fresh light on this American nightmare. At last we know what really happened. At last it all makes sense.--From publisher description.… (more)
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 27 mentions

Showing 1-5 of 7 (next | show all)
This book is basically minute by minute telling of the assassination of Kennedy. It had a heavy goal of showing how ridiculously unfounded conspiracy theories are. Toward the end it got a bit tedious, but it did as it promised. ( )
1 vote Hilaurious | Jun 2, 2020 |
This is, after the 900-page Warren Commission Report, perhaps the single most important book about the Kennedy assassination, regardless of what you believe happened on that day. It opens with probably the best re-telling of the story (at least the story as originally presented by the Commission) that I have ever seen. It then addresses many of the most important claims which have been made over the years to challenge the conclusions of the Commission. Bugliosi's claim that he presents each conspiracy theory in the way the people who believe it would present it themselves, prior to debunking each one, is probably not quite literally true. He allows perhaps a bit too much of his scorn to show through at times, although it must be said that many of the conspiracy crowd scarcely deserve more. But he does in fact have enough respect for the critics of the Commission to address their charges directly and exhaustively. Although this approach has been used in the past, for example by Gerald Posner in his book Case Closed, there is no other book out there that comes close to this one. Bugliosi's mastery of the details of the case is a marvel. This is truly a useful service.

This book is not just for people who accept the official version of the story. A good majority of the people who dig deep into the assassination literature seem to be conspiracy people. This is probably because if a person believes the Warren Commission's story, there is unlikely to be same motivation to search for the true solution to the puzzle. (I began my own study of the subject years ago, harboring dark suspicions about LBJ. Now I think it was probably just Oswald himself, although Sylvia Odio's testimony to the Commission does raise at least the possibility of conspiracy with some Cubans. Bugliosi's treatment of this, probably the most difficult conspiracy theory to explain away, is worth the price of admission all by itself.) This book should be required reading for all conspiracy theorists, because it challenges their views. If they cannot respond to Bugliosi's arguments, they may, if they are honest, have to modify their views. Or simply dismiss the work of the Warren Commission as just a big pack of lies which is to be avoided because it'll only confuse you. (Lots of people explicitly say that you should not read the Report. They also say you shouldn't read this book. Whatever.)

Even now, over half a century later, the truth about the death of JFK does matter. Perhaps no one person knows more about the case than Bugliosi. No matter what your opinion about it is, you can learn something here. ( )
1 vote briteness | Mar 25, 2019 |
Hard to argue with how good this is, and what an achievement – the work of one man over 20 years, covering as much of the goings on surrounding the assassination as can feasibly be fit in one book. The case against Oswald is set out conclusively, and by the end of it there’s no real doubt as to what happened. The section discussing the conspiracy theories is often good fun and a slightly scary insight into the crazy things people will actually believe, as well as the limp, ridiculous ideas people will accept if it suits their dislike of government or whatever else. It’s enjoyable to read the idea that someone as pig-headed and unreliable as Oswald was useful to anyone as a hitman or a patsy, or that the actually-mentally-ill Jack Ruby would be trusted to so much as buy a pint of milk for the mob, given the complete lack of respect they deserve. Perhaps the best bit in this vein is the 100-or-so page chapter pointing out the endless lies in Oliver Stone’s movie JFK – Bugliosi apologies for even discussing the film, as it lessens the quality of his book to engage with such tripe, but accepts it is necessary given the film’s popularity – and all its self-contradictory, invented guff.

The book has an unexpected strength too in its many digressions – on the history of the mob in the USA, the way in which bullet fragments can be identified and linked to a particular rifle etc – which give a wide variety of information on subjects I, at least, would never take time to read about otherwise. ( )
4 vote roblong | Aug 8, 2011 |
Maybe this is the only book anyone will ever need to read on the Kennedy assassination. Bugliosi systematically demolishes theory after theory and concludes what so many people seemed surprisingly reluctant to believe in the first place - that a lonesome loser, almost on a whim, could destroy the life of a charismatic and powerful man. In the claustrophobically overcrowded field of Kennedy assassination literature, it is such a relief to have someone, at long last, talking sense, but Bugliosi occasionally leavens a grave and tragic subject with humour when spotlighting the more ridiculous of the theories - who cares if he gets a bit sarcastic at times with people who thoroughly deserve it? His imaginary account of a conversation between Ruby and the mob if the mob had lined him up to eliminate Oswald is absolutely hilarious (pp 1142-1144.)

For once, a work on the assassination that should not have remained a tree. ( )
3 vote brianfstevenson | Oct 25, 2008 |
First of all, you gotta love a book that weighs this much! This is truly exhaustive in every sense of the word. On the plus side, there is almost no aspect of the Kennedy assassination that is not addressed in this book. On the minus side, the author does indulge in quite a bit of sarcastic commenting on the writing and research of others.

This is definitely a must-have if you're interested this subject at all. Just do some strength training before you go to the bookstore because this is one huge book! ( )
1 vote lesadee | Aug 27, 2007 |
Showing 1-5 of 7 (next | show all)
Vincent Bugliosi, the assistant district attorney who put Charles Manson away and later produced the most merciless book on O. J. Simpson (Outrage), has in one way or another been working on Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy for 21 years, ever since he acted as the prosecutor in an elaborate mock trial of Oswald that was filmed in London and included Ruth Paine among its “witnesses.” Bugliosi got a conviction and never really left the case...

Reclaiming History is a magnificent and, in many ways, appalling achievement, a work that, for all the author’s liveliness and pugnacity, is destined to be more referenced than read. Bugliosi insists that, in the face of America’s widespread and misplaced belief in the existence of a conspiracy against JFK’s life, “overkill in this book is historically necessary.” This undue elaboration includes, one supposes, the work’s primer on the civil-rights movement (as context for Kennedy’s own activity in that realm); its long history of the Mafia that Jack Ruby was not part of; nine pages on the Bay of Pigs invasion that did not motivate Fidel Castro to kill Kennedy; and four paragraphs on the oil-depletion allowance, whose reduction, unsought by Kennedy, did not drive the Texas oilman H. L. Hunt to murder the president.
 

» Add other authors (3 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
BUGLIOSI, Vincentprimary authorall editionsconfirmed
KENNEDY, John F.Associated Namesecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
HERRMANN, EdwardNarratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
To the historical record, knowing that nothing in the present can exist without the paternity of history, and hence, the latter is sacred, and should never be tampered with or defiled by untruths.
First words
Introduction

At approximately 12:30 p.m. on November 22, 1963, while President John F. Kennedy, the most powerful man in the free world, rode in his presidential limousine slowly past the Texas School Book Depository Building and down Elm Street in Dallas, Texas, three shots rang out from the southeasternmost window on the sixth floor of the building.
Marina Oswald awakens in the dark.
Quotations
Not even God can change the past. However, if we define history in the broader sense of that which succeeding generations believe and accept as the truth, then Stone, more than any other single American, is responsible for 75 percent of Americans currently believing that a dark and wide-ranging conspiracy involving the highest reaches of our government was responsible for the death of President Kennedy, which is only pseudo-history.
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC
Polls reveal that over 75 percent of Americans believe there was a conspiracy behind Lee Harvey Oswald; some even believe Oswald was entirely innocent. In this absorbing and historic book--the first ever to cover the entire case--Vincent Bugliosi shows how we have come to believe such lies about an event that changed the course of history. Bugliosi is perhaps the only man in America capable of "prosecuting" Oswald for the murder of President Kennedy. His book is a narrative compendium of fact, forensic evidence, reexamination of key witnesses, and common sense. Every detail and nuance is accounted for, every conspiracy theory revealed as a fraud upon the American public. Bugliosi's irresistible logic, command of the evidence, and ability to draw startling inferences shed fresh light on this American nightmare. At last we know what really happened. At last it all makes sense.--From publisher description.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.23)
0.5
1 1
1.5 1
2 2
2.5 1
3 2
3.5 2
4 18
4.5 6
5 24

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

W.W. Norton

An edition of this book was published by W.W. Norton.

» Publisher information page

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 202,657,856 books! | Top bar: Always visible