Why did I buy 'Judas The Hero'? Well, the publisher's summary said "If you like Rivers of London, the Dresden Files and the Kings Watch, you will like this ", the reviews on GoodReads were mostly four or five stars, and the phrase 'DCI Judas Iscariot' hooked me.

Why did I abandon it at 20%?

Mostly it was because of the writing. Some of the scenes were vividly written and pulled me into them completely, especially the ones where there was some action going on, but then the tone would change into the passive voice when the exposition of the plot or the backstory of a character was needed and all the colour leached out of the text. Then there were the proofreading errors - missing words that had to be guessed at to make sense of a paragraph and misspellings that shouldn't have made it past the final edit. They distracted me like a scratch on a vinyl record. These were compounded by occasional glaring inconsistencies. For example, in the space of a few paragraphs, I was told that this team of ex-apostles working for John The Baptist are scary because they're unkillable immortals and then I was told that they follow their crazy leader's orders because disagreeing with him could be fatal. How can both of those things be true?

The first chapter read like the text version of a graphic novel. I could image the image of the U-Boat on the water at dawn: all the dramatic straight lines, presented in a sharply contrasting palette, heavy on blacks and reds and dark blues but with the orange of a sunrise and the yellow of a dingy for contrast. Unfortunately, the same chapter also characterised the Germans in World War II using the same simplistic clichés I remember from 1970s comic books.

The plot was original and I wanted to be convinced but little things nagged at me. For example, I liked the idea of the Second Fall in the Twenty-First Century, with more angels being kicked out of Heaven but I couldn't see why they'd all want to come to live in England and especially in London.

It was when I met Judas Iscariot that I finally set the book aside. He's the character the whole series hangs on and I found him unconvincing. Most of that was because the writing felt mechanical - like the bones of a first draft - a pencil sketch that needs colour to bring it to life - but some of it was because I couldn't see in this man someone who had lived for more than two millennia and whose mind was first formed in Judea during the Roman occupation.

I know that the things that spoil this book for me won't spoil it for others and I can see that there's a lot of fun to be had with this series if you can relax and roll with it. I'm just too much of a pedant for that. I guess that's my loss.

Many times when you read an independent author, you are resigned to deal with bad writing, poor plots with holes large enough to put an Airbus through, and dialog that could be used to frame out a new extension on your house.

Imagine how surprised I was then to find none of that in this book by Martin Davey. Billed as being in the same vein as Rivers of London or Dresden Files, it reminded me of Carey's Felix Castor or Green's Nightside series more. The writing is on par with an A-list author. I'm genuinely confused as to why a man that can write this good isn't more well known.

The series protagonist, the infamous Judas Iscariot, comes across as a well thought out living character as opposed to the bag of tropes that I was prepared to find.

I am planning on upsetting my reading list to squeeze more of these books into the rotation. A must-read for any urban fantasy fan. ( )