![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![Watsons and Emma Watson: Jane Austen's…](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/1402212291.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Watsons and Emma Watson: Jane Austen's Unfinished Novel Completed By Joan Aiken (original 1996; edition 2008)by Joan Aiken
Work InformationEmma Watson by Joan Aiken (1996)
![]() Austenland (16) No current Talk conversations about this book. Well, I just finished reading yet another Austen-inspired book titled, The Watsons (courtesy of Miss Austen) & Emma Watson (contributed by Joan Aiken). Aiken takes the readers through her vision of where The Watsons would have ended--had Austen's novel been completed. I wish I could say this was a truly astounding book, but at the most, it was an interesting read. In my opinion, you really have to get over the hang up of Aiken diverting so much from Austen's writing style in order to accept the story. On it's own, it may have been fine, but when you pair it up with The Watsons and jump from one story straight to the other, well...there's a huge feeling of dischord. My strongest feeling about the book was the disappointment in Aiken's use of the male characters. Without giving too much away, Emma has a selection of men presented to her throughout the story, yet her romantic interest winds up very briefly and really without much to ponder on. A character plucked out of nowhere and set in front of her and she decides this is it? Come now...a little more depth to the relationship would have been glady appreciated! The other relationships in the novel are typical and non-eventful. Very few surprises at all. The Watson sisters remind me a great deal of another famous set of sisters (hint...P&P). Perhaps that's where Aiken drew from when she fleshed out her characters. I could almost have imagined the story as an alternate ending for P&P had Lizzy and Jane not found their true loves. All in all, the book kept my attention, though perhaps not for all the right reasons. I was really curious most of the time to see what more sad events could befall Emma. The more I got away from The Watsons, the more I was able to enjoy Aiken's style for her own and not constantly compare it to Miss Austen's....which seemed only fair to both women! Truly, no one is comparable to the Miss Austen!! I don't expect Aiken to fool me into thinking that this is Austen's work, but I do expect a competent novel. This was initially promising, but it begins to descend into melodrama. The ending is very perfunctory; the heroine finds her "true love" with almost magically with little development of their relationship. What is there is quite good, it is just not substantial enough for me to believe that the moment Emma catches sight of him, she knows that they are going to be married. After reading this and Lady Catherine's necklace, Aiken's sequel to Pride and Prejudice, it appears to me that the author is rather bored with romances - I strongly recommend that she try writing something else. It is possible to write a historical novel of this period without leeching off of Austen. I strongly recommend John Coates' finishing of this fragment, The Watsons. no reviews | add a review
Contains
This is the fourth of Joan Aiken's Jane Austen entertainments. Emma, adopted by her aunt after the death of her mother, has rejoined her ailing father and her sister at the age of 19. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
So I grabbed Aiken's novel, said to be a continuation, and was immediately disappointed--because what it really is, is more a re-imagining. It doesn't take up where Austen left off or use any passages of the original but reworks the material, and coming straight from the wellspring it seemed a rather poor imitation of Austen's style without Austen's insights and wit--and I was immediately struck by pointless differences. Mrs Blake in Austen's novel is a widow--in Aiken's she's the wife of a living naval officer. And in Austen's novel Emma's invalid father seems, even if physically weak, still sharp mentally while Aiken makes him befuddled.
That's nothing compared though to the marked difference in quality. I don't expect Aiken to equal Austen, who is one of the great novelists in the English language, but if this were a Regency romance with no connection to Austen, it wouldn't recommend itself as in any way exceptional. And as a continuation--well, Austen told her sister Cassandra her intentions and I read them at the end of the text of The Watsons--Aiken doesn't honor them. So I can't recommend this either as a "completion" of The Watsons for those who'd love to see Austen's intentions played out or a romantic historical novel on its own merits. (