The World Set Free

This is a kind of retro-future history, giving the great sweep of events leading to the Last World War (a nuclear one), the collapse of society, and the creation of a scientifically-organized utopia. It dips in and out of indviduals' perspectives in a way that's kind of neat: this inventor here, this soldier there, this king somewhere. Bits of it are interesting; the last segment, as the utopia gets put together is not. Wells's earlier novels of apocalypse-becoming-utopia (The War in the Air and The Sleeper Awakes) were much more circumspect about the details of the utopia, and I think that was the better move.

Folks will tell you that Wells was the first to depict nuclear bombs in fiction. He got it wrong (not sure if that's because he show more was wrong or contemporary science was), using the idea of the half life pretty strongly:

"What the earlier twentieth-century chemists called its half period was seventeen days; that is to say, it poured outpouring half of the huge store of energy in its great molecules in the space of seventeen days, the next seventeen days' emission was a half of that first period's outpouring, and so on. As with all radio-active substances this Carolinum, though every seventeen days its power is halved, though constantly it diminishes towards the imperceptible, is never entirely exhausted, and to this day the battle-fields and bomb-fields of that frantic time in human history are sprinkled with radiant matter and so centres of inconvenient rays...." (59-60)

How cool is that (from a fictional perspective)-- bombs that go on forever in ever-diminishing amounts. It's a frightening, but fascinating image.

(For some reason this Bison Frontiers of the Imagination edition retitles The World Set Free to The Last War: A World Set Free. Ugh. Why? Who knows, because there's no editorial matter other than Greg Bear's introduction, which specifically rejects the retitling in a footnote.) show less

The most notable thing about this sf novel is that in 1914 Wells predicted atomic energy and atomic warfare. It’s too bad no one heeded his warning. In fact it seems his ideas inspired the scientists who worked on the atom bomb. This is the only book of 1914 I encountered that admitted the possibility of a war that would kill millions, even as such a war got underway. This book doesn’t have a plot or main characters in a traditional way. It’s a history book from the future, and the first chapter (the “prelude”) covers actual history. The rest of the book covers the development of atomic power which essentially creates free energy that destroys the world economy, and then atomic war destroys all the major cities, killing show more everyone and leaving a radioactive landscape. However, after that the book becomes remarkably upbeat as the survivors create a world government that unifies the planet. You get snapshots of life from different people throughout the book. Other than a kind of dismissive attitude toward India, this book isn’t even racist. The edition I read had an actually interesting introduction, by Greg Bear, comparing Henry James and Wells, who were frenemies. Bear says that this was the moment when speculative fiction and literary fiction parted ways. Spec fic (along with my bff Arnold Bennett) was dismissed as trying to get people to believe in something and too action/plot oriented. Literary fiction was elevated for being sexless, bloodless, and more about money and people’s inner lives than stuff happening. Bear puts forward the non-dual POV that there’s no reason these two styles had to be opposed to each other. Anyway, I thought it was notable that this was one of the few books of 1914 that has been reprinted by a reputable press with attention paid to the book design—because actual normal humans might want to read this book. show less

I’m setting myself free from this book. It is seen as prescient because it was written just before the First World War and described atomic bombs and nuclear warfare with what turned out to be reasonable accuracy. The first part of the book was OK, but when the book moved into quoting extracts from a fictional Great Novelist who described the nuclear war, I lost interest rapidly. It was hard to tell what was Wells’s narration and what was the fictional book. On the plus side, this book didn’t scare the pants off me like most books about nuclear warfare do.

This was a fairly decent book by H.G Wells. Many of the nightmarish scenario qualities that inhabit this universe are relatable to our modern era and that makes the book less aged and dated than some of the language would make it seem. This is a book focused on its plot, setting, and the implications that it raises instead of its characters. This is the power of the tale, but also its detraction. Overall, a fairly good read for those interested in Wells' science fiction.

3 stars.

Another astonishingly prescient book from Wells - this one not only anticipated the atomic bomb but a world war that was about to begin just a few months after the book was published. As a novel, it's a bit of a collage - almost like linked stories that bring the reader through the scientific discoveries that led to the making of the atomic bomb and descriptions of the world before and after. Like so many of Wells' novels from this period, there is a real tension between optimism and pessimism.

Like so much of Wells's writing, this combines his strength in popular history, scientific futurism and utopian ideas. It is best known as a novel predicting future discoveries in atomic energy, but (more significantly) also the social and political consequences of that knowledge.

https://fromtheheartofeurope.eu/the-world-set-free-a-fantasia-of-the-future-by-h...

This was written in 1913 and published in 1914. It’s quite a short book, an account of a near future where nuclear weapons are developed, major cities are devastated and the nations of the world come together to decide against future war and create a Utopia. It must have been at least indirectly inspiring for the creation of the United Nations thirty years later, and it’s striking how much closer to the mark he got with the impact of new technology on war than he did in The War in the Air, only six years earlier.

I have to say that as a novel it is not all that great. Good chaps, some of whom are royalty, get together in a remote resort to sort the show more world out, and there is not a lot of drama other than the big bangs of war. There are two named women characters, who have a dialogue on women’s place in the new order at the end. (And there’s a point-of-view unnamed secretary in Paris who witnesses one of the bombings in an earlier chapter.) It’s part of the chain of thought that ends with The Shape of Things to Come, and I think interesting mainly for that reason. show less