Ina May's Guide to Childbirth

Between this and [b:The Mama Natural Week-by-Week Guide to Pregnancy and Childbirth|29430619|The Mama Natural Week-by-Week Guide to Pregnancy and Childbirth|Genevieve Howland|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1488107243l/29430619._SX50_.jpg|49695208], I get the vibe that "natural" childbirth books do make pregnant folks feel less fearful about birth in general... while also instilling a fear of the medical profession and interventions, which I find less productive. Your mileage may vary. This was lent to me by a friend.

The first half is entirely anecdotes by parents who mostly birthed at The Farm commune in Tennessee or had midwife-attended/influenced births. Many of them are from the 1970s and show more 1980s, with the most recent being around 2000 (which makes sense since this was published in 2003). Still, a little disconcerting to read about births for people older than me...

...the temporal nature also applies to how I feel about the second half. In the twenty years since this was published, I do think the profession has changed- the American c-section and maternal mortality rate is still high compared to the rest of the world, but there's far more baby-friendly (per WHO rules) hospitals, including the one I plan to deliver at. When asked about birth preferences last week I mentioned wanting to avoid an episiotomy if I can, and two different docs mentioned that it's been years since they've seen one done at my local facility. Likewise, the chapter "What You Need to Know About Your Pregnancy and Prenatal Care" dismisses most screening/testing as Ina May believes they tend to lead to unnecessary interventions and... this strikes me as irresponsible, though NIPT (nonexistent in 2003) is definitely less invasive than amnio or CVS (and as someone with a genetics background, OF COURSE I was going to do testing!! It's really interesting!!)

I also have a gestational diabetes diagnosis. She thinks that "the anxiety that is often produced by [the glucose tolerance test] simply isn't worth the information gained from it. Sometimes, when the test is positive, you may be urged to undergo further expensive tests and treatments with no proven benefit" and goes on to say that sometimes women feel funny and have high sugar readings that wouldn't be detected by testing, usually because they ate something that they don't tolerate well during pregnancy, like white flour and sugar which should be eliminated from the woman's diet... ma'am, that's literally what's suggested as a GD treatment!! It would not have been on my radar if I hadn't done two different glucose tests, because while I do have some family history I don't get dizzy spells from sugar.

In short, while Ina May is probably right that avoiding screenings and tests will reduce anxiety, it does create the potential situation of going into birth blind to potential complications until it's possibly too late. I prefer knowing what's going on and the likelihood of future events. Modern medicine doesn't solely exist for profit; as someone who was a premature baby (my mom's water broke weeks early, and she was an older first time mother), I have a healthy respect for interventions as I probably wouldn't be here otherwise! I'm curious if Ina May's ever considered updating or revising this, or if it will be a snapshot of perspectives from the early 2000s after 40 years in the business.

Also: you're going to see photos of crowning babies coming out of labia in this book, just be forewarned! Fascinating, but just a heads up (heh). show less

The midwife lent me a whole stack of books (and is always pushing me to take more), but so far the only one I've read cover-to-cover is this one. And I'm wishing I'd read this before I had Jefferson.

Roughly the first half of this book is birth stories. Almost all of them are midwife-assisted births at The Farm, a village/commune in Tennessee, mostly just in homes without a lot of special equipment. Very few of the births had to be transported to the hospital, though those are represented as well. The stories are testament to what a calm and experienced birth assistant, a trust in the power of a woman's body, and the natural process of birth itself can do -- even when the mother gets temporarily hung up by fear, even with extremely large show more babies, and even with some fairly troublesome complications.

The second half of the book is a collection of essays by Ina May on the current state of birthing in the United States. (Primarily it's about this country anyway, there is also a lot of data from other countries for comparison.) The latter chapters are sometimes hopeful, sometimes chilling, but mostly make me glad we're trying for a midwife-assisted home birth this time.

But this book is mostly famous in our house for two pictures of a face-presentation. Jefferson was looking over my shoulder one day as I was reading this book and liked all the pictures of babies. So I started flipping through it with him looking for the pictures. Most were standard mom and baby post-birth posed shots, but on page 58 there is a picture of a baby where only the face has emerged from the birth canal, and then another of the baby right after delivery, with its poor face all smooshed and swollen. I was a little worried about Jefferson's reaction, as I hadn't intended to give him quite such a graphic introduction to "where babies come from," but he loved the pictures, and for a while developed a nightly routine of wanting to see the baby pictures before bed. At one point he even indicated the face presentation and told me he wanted me to have that baby. I told him no matter how much I loved him and wanted him to be happy, I would never wish for a face presentation.

Anyway! I loved this book. Very authoritative and informational. Would recommend to anyone interested in a more natural version of childbirth. show less

Although this book contains much factual information about pregnancy and childbirth, Ina May's Guide to Childbirth is just as much a book on childbirth philosophy as it is a book about the process of birthing a baby.

The heart of the book is a number of birth stories, sometimes in the words of the women who gave birth and sometimes in the words of Ina May. While some of the women further toward new age woo than I think is quite reasonable, for the most part, these are powerful stories of women finding in their bodies and minds the power to give birth in a way that doesn't treat birth as a medical problem to be fixed. One thing I appreciate about these stories is that they don't exclusively describe normal, uncomplicated births. A good show more handful of the stories contain births that were difficult.

One thing Gaskin does well is demonstrate how many of the birth interventions that are sold as conveniences can hamper birth and lead to further interventions that the woman did not originally want. For example, the labor inducing drug Pitocin (synthetic oxytocin) can force the body into labor before the pelvic region has finished preparing for birth which, in turn, leads to higher levels of cesarean sections. This isn't to say cesarean sections are bad. The point is that a woman may choose one intervention — induced labor — and end up with another which she may not have personally wanted — a cesarean section. Another example is epidurals to kill the pain of birth can lead to higher levels of perineum tears because the woman giving birth is unable to feel when she is pushing too hard or too fast.

Because of this, Gaskin advocates letting women's bodies do their work and turn to interventions only as needed. The medical interventions that doctors have available to them today are wonderful lifesavers, but by treating them as conveniences that can standardize birth, we start down a chain of interventions in way that are not always desirable.

Beyond the philosophy, this book also contains a lot of information about the birth process that emphasizes how to let the process of birth happen in its own way: let the birth take time; stand up and move around to help the baby into the right position and let gravity help you push it out; laugh or let your partner sexually stimulate you to relax you and help to loosen your muscles; etc. These aren't magical incantations to make the birth process pain free and fast, but they are ways of working with the birth process rather than against it.

You shouldn't read this book expecting a neutral presentation of non-medical birth, but you should read it if you want a book that focuses on birth as a normal process not something to be medicated away. show less

If there was one book I could get everyone to read, it's this one. Whether you're planning to have a baby, are pregnant, or if you give two hoots about the care that pregnant women and babies receive in North America. I read it as part of my Doula training and wish that I'd read it while I was pregnant.

The first half of the book is birth stories, usually written by the mother giving birth. They are moving, amazing, intimate peeks into one of life's biggest adventures. So many of them start out with: "I had my first kid(s) in the hospital and it was awful. There has to be a better way! So I went to The Farm for this one. " They definitely don't have to be read in order. I found it useful to open the book at random and read the story I show more found there.

The second part of the book is more scholarly. There are references to statistics and studies that show how different pregnancy and baby care is in North America compared to the rest of the world. I was quite alarmed to learn about some things, such as stitching up a uterus after a Cesarean birth in one layer rather than two, and Ina May's experience that this practice dramatically increased dangerous hemorrhaging during subsequent labours. Stitching up in one layer is done to save time, and is one of many examples in which time and money has come to take precedence over maternal and baby health.

This book made me want to buy a bunch of land and build my own hippie commune. show less

This is such a thoughtful, informative book regarding natural childbirth. Midwife Ina May Gaskin holds a masters degree in English and it is evident in her writing. Her thoughts stem from more than 40 years of experience attending births and highlight the stark difference between the traditional medical framework that obstetricians work within to assist women in delivering their babies and those who practice true natural childbirth. Arguably the most astounding section of her book is the statistics from 2,028 births that she has assisted. The difference between these statistics and typical hospital statistics are jaw-dropping to say the least, and left me knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt that a natural birth is not only possible, but show more also healthier for both mother and baby. Truly this is a must-read for every woman who is pregnant or who ever plans to become pregnant and every person who will assist in a woman's labor and/or delivery. show less

I picked this book up because I currently work in the medical field and, recently, have become extremely passionately picky about some of the trends? moral errors? that I've come in contact with. Are the same sort of things happening in the OBGYN field, I asked myself?

The short answer is: probably yes. (even I know some nice OBGYNs)

I recommend reading this before you get pregnant, but read it. Read it to understand what is different here in the US compared to Europe. Read it to know what questions you should ask yourself and your OBGYN (if you'll ever need one) about beliefs about pregnancy. And read it to discover what you've silently been taught about pregnancy. Then decide if it is correct.

I've seen/heard of my share of show more complications in the hospital setting. And I've heard of complications from the midwife setting (some of them close to home). But I think both of those arguments--which I have seen internet pundits defend strongly--ignore 3 vital truths that I think we can all agree on: 1, women were made/created to be able to bear healthily and so can you.* A rare type of cancer this is not. 2, Women deliver healthy babies more easily when they are not afraid (you do you). 3, The mother's health is equitably as important as the baby's health.

I have to admit, for the first 10 pages or so, I was aghast. What sort of hippie was this person? This was not what I had been told about this book. This was not the sort of person I thought (or at least like to think) I was. But then I looked at a couple reviews that recommended the second section so I quickly flipped there and mentally breathed a sigh of relief. This was what people had told me to expect. So skip the first section. Read the second.

This also brought up some other questions, though. Would midwifery get less flack if it dressed itself in trendy clothes and threw away the 70s glasses and ponytails? Not quite sure why this seems to be the trend (even in the ones I know in 2018).

EDIT Aug 2019:
I just watched Ricci Lake's The Business of Being Born, which has an interview with Gaskin. They reference the returning popularity of a home birth as stemming from the (then) atrocious hospital practices, and the hippie movement. So the hippie-ness of this book probably stems from that. Again, as referenced above, it doesn't help.


* Thank you Kiss Me Kate/Shakespeare. But, for goodness' sake! do not repeat this. It's one of his worst lines. show less

I didn't get a chance to finish it due to Henry's three-week-early arrival, but the first section was enough to assure me that I could do a natural birth. Which I didn't, I suppose, what with the epidural and pitocin, but I made a valiant effort. Overall, it left me with the impression that childbirth is natural and not scary, which is exactly what every new mother should hear. I could have done without the photos of the woman having an orgasmic birth, but what can you do?