HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America (1998)

by Richard Rorty

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
454655,075 (3.94)4
Must the sins of America's past poison its hope for the future? Lately the American Left, withdrawing into the ivied halls of academe to rue the nation's shame, has answered yes in both word and deed. In Achieving Our Country, one of America's foremost philosophers challenges this lost generation of the Left to understand the role it might play in the great tradition of democratic intellectual labor that started with writers like Walt Whitman and John Dewey. How have national pride and American patriotism come to seem an endorsement of atrocities--from slavery to the slaughter of Native Americans, from the rape of ancient forests to the Vietnam War? Achieving Our Country traces the sources of this debilitating mentality of shame in the Left, as well as the harm it does to its proponents and to the country. At the center of this history is the conflict between the Old Left and the New that arose during the Vietnam War era. Richard Rorty describes how the paradoxical victory of the antiwar movement, ushering in the Nixon years, encouraged a disillusioned generation of intellectuals to pursue "High Theory" at the expense of considering the place of ideas in our common life. In this turn to theory, Rorty sees a retreat from the secularism and pragmatism championed by Dewey and Whitman, and he decries the tendency of the heirs of the New Left to theorize about the United States from a distance instead of participating in the civic work of shaping our national future. In the absence of a vibrant, active Left, the views of intellectuals on the American Right have come to dominate the public sphere. This galvanizing book, adapted from Rorty's Massey Lectures of 1997, takes the first step toward redressing the imbalance in American cultural life by rallying those on the Left to the civic engagement and inspiration needed for "achieving our country."… (more)
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 4 mentions

Showing 1-5 of 6 (next | show all)
Since the election of 2016, I have read many accounts of "Why?" Rorty's account of what led to the election outcome is by far the best that I have read and it does not have the luxury of hindsight.

The book is grounded in an analysis of the early-to-mid twentieth century's reformist left and its differences with the cultural left that blossomed in the American academy from the 60's through the 90's when the book was written. Based on his analysis, Rorty simply looks to the horizon and sees 2016 shimmering in the distance.

This is an account meant for a target audience on the left. If these are your leanings, you should read this book to get a clear idea of the options available for what the left might choose to do in the future and in the wake of 2016. If these are not your leanings, listen in and see what the opposition might be up to. ( )
  tsgood | Dec 29, 2021 |
Whitman, Dewey and Democracy
This book contains a series of lectures given by R. Rorty about leftist thought and political action in 21st America accompanied by two short texts in which he intended to clarify even more his thoughts on the matter. Rorty lamented the turn of many leftist academics and thinkers to what he denominated “cultural problems” or “victim studies”. Drawing in his interpretation of Whitman and Dewey, he pointed that in order to achieve relevance in the political landscape of contemporary America the left must embraces the ideas that compound its identity, rather than emphasizes its sins. Dewey and Whitman, he argues, “...wanted to put hope for a casteless and classless America in the place traditionally occupied by knowledge of the will of God. They wanted that utopian America to replace God as the unconditional object of desire. They wanted the struggle for social justice to be the country’s animating principle, the nation’s soul”. Rorty views this path as the one which answers the political aspirations of the majority of the american people. He urges the left to not disregard it and predicts a political outcome similar to that of Trump election, if it does. The book is worth reading. Rorty writes with clarity. His arguments are well grounded. At the end, the reader leaves with a better comprehension of the questions examined. ( )
1 vote MarcusBastos | Feb 12, 2018 |
It was Rorty's passing that prompted me to pick this up and it intrigued me enough to want to read more. Although I was a philosophy major (a long, long time ago), I hadn't been exposed to his work before and suspect it was an unforgivable lapse on the part of my professors at UConn that he was never required reading. Really, I don't recall pragmatism getting much of a shake and feel like there's a pretty big gap in my education as a result.

If nothing else, this book could serve as an inoculation for the student who's read some of the Ancient Greeks, Utilitarianism through Mill, and Kant but is now getting out of Philosophy 101 and about to be exposed to the egghead nexus where Marxism meets literary criticism.

Where Rorty is perhaps most engaging is in his discussion of agents vs. spectators and the appropriate balance between national pride and shame. He's passionate about the need to be proud of our progressive history and focusing on that pride on participation in our democratic process. He says, I'm paraphrasing here, "Look, you can acknowledge our nation's mistakes, some of the horrible and cruel, and either disengage from the system in protest, believing that it can't be fixed ... or you can be part of the solution." The pragmatic thing to do is not get hung up on how far away we are attaining a society that is just, but instead to try to make progress. ( )
  cdogzilla | Jun 22, 2007 |
Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America--failure of democracy, technology, J Dewey, Interdisciplinary, Whitman--return to ( )
  Rosinbow | Aug 15, 2009 |
Reviewed by Edward S. Shapiro for H-Net here:

http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=6982928775409
This review has been flagged by multiple users as abuse of the terms of service and is no longer displayed (show).
  chrisbrooke | Oct 27, 2005 |
Showing 1-5 of 6 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
These lectures are dedicated to the memory of Irving Howe and of A. Phillip Randolph, Jr. I had only fleeting personal contact with these two men, but the writings, their social roles, and their political stances made a great impression on me when I was young. They seemed then, and still seem to symbolize my country at its best.
First words
National pride is to countries what self-respect is to individuals: a necessary condition for self-improvement.
Quotations
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (2)

Must the sins of America's past poison its hope for the future? Lately the American Left, withdrawing into the ivied halls of academe to rue the nation's shame, has answered yes in both word and deed. In Achieving Our Country, one of America's foremost philosophers challenges this lost generation of the Left to understand the role it might play in the great tradition of democratic intellectual labor that started with writers like Walt Whitman and John Dewey. How have national pride and American patriotism come to seem an endorsement of atrocities--from slavery to the slaughter of Native Americans, from the rape of ancient forests to the Vietnam War? Achieving Our Country traces the sources of this debilitating mentality of shame in the Left, as well as the harm it does to its proponents and to the country. At the center of this history is the conflict between the Old Left and the New that arose during the Vietnam War era. Richard Rorty describes how the paradoxical victory of the antiwar movement, ushering in the Nixon years, encouraged a disillusioned generation of intellectuals to pursue "High Theory" at the expense of considering the place of ideas in our common life. In this turn to theory, Rorty sees a retreat from the secularism and pragmatism championed by Dewey and Whitman, and he decries the tendency of the heirs of the New Left to theorize about the United States from a distance instead of participating in the civic work of shaping our national future. In the absence of a vibrant, active Left, the views of intellectuals on the American Right have come to dominate the public sphere. This galvanizing book, adapted from Rorty's Massey Lectures of 1997, takes the first step toward redressing the imbalance in American cultural life by rallying those on the Left to the civic engagement and inspiration needed for "achieving our country."

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.94)
0.5
1
1.5 1
2 3
2.5
3 10
3.5 2
4 18
4.5 1
5 16

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 205,876,377 books! | Top bar: Always visible