Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases
by Peter Mark Roget, John Lewis Roget, Samuel Romilly Roget
On This Page
Description
Peter Mark Roget (1779-1869) trained as a physician in Edinburgh and London, yet he was increasingly drawn to the sciences, corresponding with Erasmus Darwin, Thomas Beddoes and Humphry Davy. He practised medicine (free of charge) in London at the Northern Dispensary, which he co-founded, and lectured on physiology and medical topics. His Bridgewater Treatise, on animal and vegetable physiology, is also reissued in the Cambridge Library Collection. Roget is remembered today for the present show more work, first published in 1852 following his retirement from professional duties. As the preface makes clear, he had contemplated such a work for nearly fifty years. The thesaurus, continually expanded and updated, has always remained in print, but this reissued first edition shows the impressive breadth of Roget's own knowledge and interests. show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
Had this Book Club Associates' edition forwarded to me soon after its publication in 1973 when I was living in Scandinavia, short on Markka & pretending to be a budding author. It was an invaluable tool - to find that ultimate keyword your mind has let slip - and has continued to be every year since then although my oeuvre remains perilously slim!
A Thesaurus's role is to complement, not replace the inestimable Dictionary: as R.A. Dutch states in the preface (1962), "It furnishes no labels for 'speech level', for what is scholarly, literary or vulgar, or archaic and obsolete" (and certainly this Edition along with me is bordering on that last vestige of practical usefulness that was my ambition and is now for youthful aspiring writers).
A Thesaurus's role is to complement, not replace the inestimable Dictionary: as R.A. Dutch states in the preface (1962), "It furnishes no labels for 'speech level', for what is scholarly, literary or vulgar, or archaic and obsolete" (and certainly this Edition along with me is bordering on that last vestige of practical usefulness that was my ambition and is now for youthful aspiring writers).
Note in the back hand-written by my father:
This volume was won as a prize in a literary competition known as Bullets run by the magazine John Bull, a publication of Odhams Press (1933). The originalowner was Harold Jones of 34 York Street, South Bank, Yorks (1952). House and street demolished 1970.
Sellotaped to the frontispiece is a press-cutting from I don't know which newspaper, letters to the editor containing rhyming mnemonics for the English kings and queens.
I much prefer this tatty old thesaurus to more modern versions and use it when doing crosswords, as did my Dad before me (and perhaps Uncle Harold but he died when I was small).
This volume was won as a prize in a literary competition known as Bullets run by the magazine John Bull, a publication of Odhams Press (1933). The originalowner was Harold Jones of 34 York Street, South Bank, Yorks (1952). House and street demolished 1970.
Sellotaped to the frontispiece is a press-cutting from I don't know which newspaper, letters to the editor containing rhyming mnemonics for the English kings and queens.
I much prefer this tatty old thesaurus to more modern versions and use it when doing crosswords, as did my Dad before me (and perhaps Uncle Harold but he died when I was small).
I prefer the original organization to the dictionary style-leads me more to associated topics and ideas and how various words relate to one another
Sorry, I just don't get it, understand it, grasp it, make the connection, dig it, comprehend it.
The reason each word exists is that it is its own thing. By definition the thesaurus is telling you to do something wrong: to replace a word with something that isn't quite right.
I'm not going to say any more, but I DEMAND that you go here and watch/listen to The Thesaurus Song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHDn7_pmRug
It's brilliant, wonderful, fantastic, the best, fabulous....you get the idea.
The reason each word exists is that it is its own thing. By definition the thesaurus is telling you to do something wrong: to replace a word with something that isn't quite right.
I'm not going to say any more, but I DEMAND that you go here and watch/listen to The Thesaurus Song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHDn7_pmRug
It's brilliant, wonderful, fantastic, the best, fabulous....you get the idea.
When I was in Leaving (year 11) my mother gave me this fabulous book, a book that would tell you words similar in meaning.
There it was in black and white, a way to find the exact word that I wanted.
Hardly a week goes by without my looking something up in it.
There it was in black and white, a way to find the exact word that I wanted.
Hardly a week goes by without my looking something up in it.
Most useful little book
Very good condition. Tight & clean
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
A Good Read (Radio 4)
37 works; 1 member
Talk Discussions
Past Discussions
Help needed: Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (edited by George Davidson) in Book talk (October 2014)
Author Information
Some Editions
Series
Belongs to Publisher Series
Work Relationships
Has the adaptation
Common Knowledge
- Canonical title
- Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases
- Alternate titles
- Roget's thesaurus
- Original publication date
- 1852 First published; 1953 Published by Penguin Books; 1962 New edition first published by Longman; 1987 Revised, published by Longman; 1988 Abridged, published by Penquin Books
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 1,967
- Popularity
- 10,682
- Reviews
- 12
- Rating
- (4.08)
- Languages
- English, French
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 47
- ASINs
- 67





















































