On This Page
Description
Winter, 1433 -- and Jeanne d'Arc's ashes still glow... In the battle between Good and Evil, the Black Knight's sword fells enemies with silent grace. The Knight has sworn that fallen angel Lucifer de Morte and his cruel brotherhood will pay for their reign of terror over France -- and over the d'Ange family, where nearly all have died a terrible death. All but one... Yet the Knight's hard-won battles and dented armor hide a larger secret. For "he" is actually Seraphim d'Ange. She is show more traveling to de Morte's demesnes, executing his demon henchmen along the way. Now, aided by Baldwin, a family retainer, and San Juste, a mysterious stranger, Sera grows closer and closer to her final target. Yet little does she know that there is one more aspect of power she herself holds.... show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
This was the first review I ever posted online--back in 1994 on Amazon:
I've been keeping up with the Luna imprint for a friend interested in submitting. I love fantasy, like a well-written romance. No hardship I'd have thought. If it weren't for that, I would have stopped reading "Seraphim" at the prologue.
From the start, the prose was riddled with jarring point of view shifts, tense shifts, and the purplest of prose. There is much use of words like "'twas," "magick," "damsel" "yonder" and such overwrought mixed metaphors as "[He] shot cupid's arrow through her heart, where the iron branded a new scar onto her soul." The hero's eyes are "violet" and the heroine's is often described as "sapphire." This kind of writing is especially show more evident in the explicit, graceless major love scene. It's the kind of book it's more irresistible to MST than read.
I won't spoil things for those insistent on trying it anyway, but it's filled with the most implausible plot twists in creation--I guess they are twists except in the case of the heroine and antagonist their very names makes them seem clueless not to realize their own natures. It's not giving much away though to relate this is based on the hoariest of fem fantasy cliches--rape and revenge. Only so many have done it so much better.
I've never even submitted a review here before, I don't live to tear authors' works apart. On the whole, I've liked the Lunas. I enjoyed Lackey's "Fairy Godmother" which had the best world-building, was disappointed with Asaro's given her rep (but it wasn't as bad as "Seraphim"), truly loved Zettel's "In Camelot's Shadow" which managed to make that legend fresh, and was charmed by Hale's "The Wizard's Ward" which had perhaps the most appealing hero and interesting character arc. But skip "Seraphim"--which I can only hope is an aberration in this line of books. show less
I've been keeping up with the Luna imprint for a friend interested in submitting. I love fantasy, like a well-written romance. No hardship I'd have thought. If it weren't for that, I would have stopped reading "Seraphim" at the prologue.
From the start, the prose was riddled with jarring point of view shifts, tense shifts, and the purplest of prose. There is much use of words like "'twas," "magick," "damsel" "yonder" and such overwrought mixed metaphors as "[He] shot cupid's arrow through her heart, where the iron branded a new scar onto her soul." The hero's eyes are "violet" and the heroine's is often described as "sapphire." This kind of writing is especially show more evident in the explicit, graceless major love scene. It's the kind of book it's more irresistible to MST than read.
I won't spoil things for those insistent on trying it anyway, but it's filled with the most implausible plot twists in creation--I guess they are twists except in the case of the heroine and antagonist their very names makes them seem clueless not to realize their own natures. It's not giving much away though to relate this is based on the hoariest of fem fantasy cliches--rape and revenge. Only so many have done it so much better.
I've never even submitted a review here before, I don't live to tear authors' works apart. On the whole, I've liked the Lunas. I enjoyed Lackey's "Fairy Godmother" which had the best world-building, was disappointed with Asaro's given her rep (but it wasn't as bad as "Seraphim"), truly loved Zettel's "In Camelot's Shadow" which managed to make that legend fresh, and was charmed by Hale's "The Wizard's Ward" which had perhaps the most appealing hero and interesting character arc. But skip "Seraphim"--which I can only hope is an aberration in this line of books. show less
The names are obvious and the story of fighting a group of brothers who get increasingly more difficult to battle is a little cliched. Readable but sometimes too much detail and the next moment not enough.
I've found this author to be readable but not impressive.
I've found this author to be readable but not impressive.
This is a book about revenge, as a woman takes arms to avenge her family.
I loved Seraphim with how she was described and how she lived things. It's a tale that I re-read over many times
I loved Seraphim with how she was described and how she lived things. It's a tale that I re-read over many times
Ratings
Members
- Recently Added By
Author Information
Some Editions
Series
Work Relationships
Is contained in
Common Knowledge
- Canonical title
- Seraphim
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 191
- Popularity
- 170,586
- Reviews
- 5
- Rating
- (2.95)
- Languages
- English, French
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 6
- ASINs
- 3




























































