Tim Junkin

I became interested in reading this book when it passed through my hands as a donation to my Little Free Library. I saw that it had been a One Book Maryland choice, and I liked that since I live in Maryland. I saw that the author also lives in Maryland so I thought I’d like to read a local author at this time. I began to read the story and familiar words came up: Cambridge, Baltimore, Choptank
River, and, oddly enough, PCR, a laboratory test for genetic material which I only became aware of show more since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was this test which proved that the incarcerated man on death row, Kirk Bloodsworth, was not the person who brutally murdered and raped a nine-year-old girl, making him innocent of the charges which put him behind bars in the Maryland Penitentiary. This is the story of how an innocent man was finally freed from being wrongfully imprisoned. It is a moving and troublesome story.

This story is upsetting on so many levels, among them the ease with which an innocent person can be imprisoned for a crime, the lack of careful and correct handling of forensic evidence, and the powerlessness of the wrongly imprisoned.

One “wow” moment of this book occurred before the jury’s verdict in this case. Kirk Bloodsworth had been in a cell with another prisoner who told him that he would be all right. There never had been another prisoner in that cell. Had that man been an angel?

If this book did anything, the gruesome description of the execution process in the Maryland Penitentiary not only firmed up my belief against the death penalty, but for sure my belief that death by gassing should not even exist. In this book I learned that in my state of Maryland death by gas was later changed to death by lethal injection. Following my read of this book which had been published in 2004, I learned that
capital punishment was abolished via the legislative process on May 2, 2013, in Maryland. For that I am grateful.

I cannot begin to imagine what it feels like to be imprisoned, but what it must have felt like to Kirk Bloodsworth, an innocent man to be sentenced to death, is beyond what I can imagine. Such a grim story. Such unfairness. So hard to read. However, it did happen. This is a fascinating read, but horrible nonetheless. show less

A riveting account of the criminal justice system gone wrong amidst the powerful drive to solve an horrific crime. And it's a compelling story of an innocent man who never gives up trying to clear his name and push for the true perpetrator to be caught. It shows human nature at it best and worst. This is the 2018 One Maryland One Book selection by Maryland Humanities- a worthy read.

Jack Stanton is a defense attorney and he is on the run. The reason why is told in flashbacks as his journey progresses. This sounds rather dull but it isn't. It's really a very interesting story, nicely paced.

Bloodsworth would have made a good feature article in the newspaper. As a book, it's much too long. So much misbehavior by the police and lawyers - but it's nothing new. And the book doesn't leave you guessing. It's all sad, repetitious, unsurprising, and ultimately not worthwhile. There certainly are some particularly good sections - for example, the explanation of the intense pressure on everyone to rush to judgment. But the failings of the US justice system are well known and have been show more written about many times. If there was something more worthwhile about this case, the author didn't make it clear.

I suppose the DNA analysis made it important for being the first death row case to be exonerated but again, DNA analysis is well known. Even PCR is well known now. As the author described it, it didn't seem particularly gripping.

The writing was ok except that so many people and details are mentioned that it's hard to remember them all, so you stop memorizing them and later when it turns out someone is important, you have long since forgotten their background story or connection. But the author gives no reminders.

I feel sad giving such a harsh review because obviously the author did his research thoroughly and carefully. No stone was left unturned. But it just didn't make for a good read. show less