Author picture

About the Author

Paul K. Moser is professor and chair of the philosophy department at Loyola University Chicago. Editor of Jesus and Philosophy and the journal American Philosophical Quarterly, he is author of The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology, Philosophy After Objectivity, and Knowledge and show more Evidence, as well as co-editor of Divine Hiddenness and The Rationality of Theism. show less

Works by Paul K. Moser

Human Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Approaches (1987) — Editor — 126 copies, 1 review
The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology (2002) — Editor — 100 copies
Divine Hiddenness: New Essays (2001) — Editor — 53 copies
Empirical Knowledge (1986) — Editor — 46 copies, 1 review
Moral Relativism: A Reader (2000) 45 copies
Contemporary Materialism: A Reader (1995) — Editor — 40 copies
A Priori Knowledge (1987) 40 copies, 1 review
The Rationality of Theism (2003) — Editor — 38 copies
The Cambridge Companion to the Problem of Evil (2017) — Editor — 32 copies
Jesus and Philosophy: New Essays (2008) — Editor — 27 copies

Associated Works

Epistemology: An Anthology (2000) — Contributor — 218 copies
The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (2007) — Contributor, some editions — 33 copies
Being Good: Christian Virtues for Everyday Life (2011) — Contributor — 32 copies, 2 reviews
The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism (2008) — Contributor — 31 copies
Naturalism: A Critical Analysis (2000) — Contributor — 30 copies
The Routledge Companion to Modern Christian Thought (2013) — Contributor — 20 copies
God in Experience: Essays of Hugh Ross Mackintosh (2018) — Editor, some editions — 1 copy

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

9 reviews
This was my first formal introduction to epistemology. My overall reaction was that Moser, Mulder & Trout admirably accomplished the dual task of creating an introduction that both addresses a wide, and sometimes bewildering, array of issues, while at the same time keeping the book remarkably readable. One feels in good hands knowing that Moser (editor of the Oxford Handbook of Epistemology) is on board.

There were brief moments here and there where things seemed to become a bit fogged-over show more (the second half of the chapter on rationality comes to mind), yet the book's overall clarity more than compensates for that.

The authors close their work by recommending what they call "broad explanationism" They see their position as the best answer to skepticism's overly risk-averse stance. On this account, epistemic rationality is largely instrumental in that one's epistemic endeavors are rational when significant truths are being gained while significant falsehoods are avoided. The "significance" here referring then to those truths or falsehoods relevant to one's explanatory (or theoretical) goals. Skepticism is acknowledged as valuable insofar as it aids in the process of avoiding falsehoods, yet to the degree it begins to disallow the acquisition of any significant truths it becomes excessively risk-averse. The theory in total is appreciably humble yet admirably bold since human finitude is soberly named but not allowed to chase our efforts at knowing from the field.
show less
Oppy's writing for Naturalism is worth reading this book. Other that that, I feel that you cannot conclude much from it, yet you might learn about different views within Philosophy and Christianity intersecting.

Deus Vult,
Gottfried
Oppy's writing for Naturalism is worth reading this book. Other that that, I feel that you cannot conclude much from it, yet you might learn about different views within Philosophy and Christianity intersecting.

Deus Vult,
Gottfried

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
36
Also by
9
Members
1,014
Popularity
#25,404
Rating
½ 3.7
Reviews
9
ISBNs
117
Languages
1

Charts & Graphs