Laura Anne Gilman
Author of Staying Dead
About the Author
Series
Works by Laura Anne Gilman
[Title missing] 5 copies
Trouble in Double 3 copies
Clean Up Your Room! 3 copies
Dusted 2 copies
Crossroads 2 copies
End of Day 1 copy
Illumination 1 copy
Departures 1 copy
Opening Acts 1 copy
Apparent Horizon 1 copy
The Dance 1 copy
Wolfling 1 copy
Blow Job Red 1 copy
Dirt on Their Hands 1 copy
Roc Sampler 1 copy
Killer Lasagna 1 copy
Werelove 1 copy
Associated Works
Murder by Magic: Twenty Tales of Crime and the Supernatural (2004) — Contributor — 267 copies, 4 reviews
Don't Forget Your Spacesuit, Dear: The Mother of All Anthologies (1996) — Contributor — 229 copies, 5 reviews
Five Seasons of Angel: Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Discuss Their Favorite Vampire (2004) — Contributor — 204 copies, 3 reviews
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Other names
- Leonard, Anna
Kornetsky, L.A. - Birthdate
- 1967-08-25
- Gender
- female
- Education
- Skidmore College
- Occupations
- editor
writer - Organizations
- D.Y.M.K. Productions
Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America
Book View Cafe - Agent
- Evan Gregory
- Nationality
- USA
- Birthplace
- New Jersey, USA
- Places of residence
- New York, New York, USA
New Jersey, USA
Seattle, USA - Associated Place (for map)
- USA
Members
Reviews
Ever since I read Devil's Tower by Mark Sumner, I've been hooked on western-fantasies. They seem to be a unique sub-genre and when they are done well, they are fascinating and different than most other fantasy. Silver on the Road is done well. It takes it's time and builds the story and characters as you go along, and the magic is subtle but almost more powerful because it is used sparingly. I really cared about Izzy and Gabriel and even Farron. They are complex and they grow throughout the show more story, both in terms of their relationship with each other, and within themselves. They both have things they are just beginning to understand and accept about themselves, especially Izzy, who is only sixteen, but this is far from a young adult read. She is a strong character without losing the naivety and wonder at the world around her. It's not a fast read, but it's deep and interesting and makes you think. I am really looking forward to the next adventure in the Devil's West and seeing how Izzy builds on everything she has learned about being the Devil's Left Hand. show less
I have to tell you, reviews I wrote in 2011 were pretty shitty. Bad enough that I only had the vaguest idea of the plot. So, I've erased 2011 and decided to be more explicit. You're welcome, Future carol.
The second in a series, Pack of Lies continues to center on Bonita Torres and her work with a team of investigators. Nine months ago, she and a group of four other people were recruited by a couple of best friends to become the first-ever magical forensic examiners, occupying a strictly show more non-partisan line in a magical community full of politics. They've had a couple of jobs since the first book, but when the team is called to a fresh crime scene, they jump without looking, viewing it as an opportunity to finally gain credibility. The crime is a sexual attack on a young woman and an impassioned defense by her companion, resulting in one of the attacker's deaths. In the background, the anti-fatae sentiment seems to be growing among the Talented humans in the community.
Plotting improves significantly in this book, with a much more investigation-centered plot and a crime that actually seems to make sense. There's a few twists to the crime, and a wonderful, bittersweet air to the resolution that is satisfying, even as it saddens. So kudos to that part; I really wanted to know what happened.
That said, I found it mildly eye-rolling (must we?) that an attempted rape/attack on a female is the centerpiece of the investigation, and that it ends up having such a profound effect on both Bonita and her teammate Sharon. Although, to give Gilman credit, she also notes Pietr had a strong reaction to the scene. While it may be true, it's such a stereotype to have it continue to color the women and their reactions. It just felt old-school, one-step removed sexism that continued to emphasize the victimness of the woman. Bringing Pietr in only mitigated it slightly, because his emotional reaction was dropped to focus on the women's.
The romantic sub-plot of this book starts to intrude more into the main plot, with Bonita and one of the team leaders, Ben, finally acknowledging their connection. While there's some progression, again, I don't think it's the kind of plotting that paranormal fans would enjoy as it is a secondary storyline with little payoff.
The writing style is very similar to the first book, with improvements in plotting helping it along. Gilman is very much of the story-telling school of narration. There's some dialogue, but mostly we're listening to Bonita or team leader Ben think things through. The Ben-narrated bits are short and mostly give us a little more insight into another underlying conflict as well as heightening the romantic tension.
The beginning of the story suffers a great deal from this sort of story-telling, as Gilman doesn't know when to cut it short, and Bonita thinks some of the same things in different ways. For instance, the significance to the team of being called to an active crime scene is remarked upon quite a bit--in her head. I suppose the reader is supposed to empathize with Bonita's feeling of internal pressure. This is the kind of thing that could have been taken care of with a little dialogue that would have given us more insight into other characters and more interest, period. I'm starting to see why so many reviewers thought it an unmemorable type of book; this style of narration lends itself to distance, and the lack of dialogue only encourages passivity.
The upshot, however, is that it's rather unusual to have a team of people who play equal roles in an urban fantasy. That's kind of a nice dynamic to see, and usually isn't complicated by the normal petty stuff many authors fall pray to (forced misunderstandings, personal drama over professional focus). It's a little annoying that there's still so much maleness around, and that despite hearing about Bonita being bisexual, we have little evidence of her scoping out women the way she does men (she considers a fatae male partner, refuses an offer to meet a woman partner, but does find a male partner). It honestly just doesn't feel like women are really integrated into the story, existing more as tokens (contrast again with my new fandom of Stephen Aryan who has more female than male main characters).
So, the non-dynamic storytelling (low re-readibility, despite my 2011 review) and lack of truly progressive character dynamics mean it's not personal library-worthy. Still, the plotting, generally intriguing set-up and non-full-on-irritatingness mean its a worthy UF distraction read. On Stephen's scale, that makes it a 'borrow.' show less
The second in a series, Pack of Lies continues to center on Bonita Torres and her work with a team of investigators. Nine months ago, she and a group of four other people were recruited by a couple of best friends to become the first-ever magical forensic examiners, occupying a strictly show more non-partisan line in a magical community full of politics. They've had a couple of jobs since the first book, but when the team is called to a fresh crime scene, they jump without looking, viewing it as an opportunity to finally gain credibility. The crime is a sexual attack on a young woman and an impassioned defense by her companion, resulting in one of the attacker's deaths. In the background, the anti-fatae sentiment seems to be growing among the Talented humans in the community.
Plotting improves significantly in this book, with a much more investigation-centered plot and a crime that actually seems to make sense. There's a few twists to the crime, and a wonderful, bittersweet air to the resolution that is satisfying, even as it saddens. So kudos to that part; I really wanted to know what happened.
That said, I found it mildly eye-rolling (must we?) that an attempted rape/attack on a female is the centerpiece of the investigation, and that it ends up having such a profound effect on both Bonita and her teammate Sharon. Although, to give Gilman credit, she also notes Pietr had a strong reaction to the scene. While it may be true, it's such a stereotype to have it continue to color the women and their reactions. It just felt old-school, one-step removed sexism that continued to emphasize the victimness of the woman. Bringing Pietr in only mitigated it slightly, because his emotional reaction was dropped to focus on the women's.
The romantic sub-plot of this book starts to intrude more into the main plot, with Bonita and one of the team leaders, Ben, finally acknowledging their connection. While there's some progression, again, I don't think it's the kind of plotting that paranormal fans would enjoy as it is a secondary storyline with little payoff.
The writing style is very similar to the first book, with improvements in plotting helping it along. Gilman is very much of the story-telling school of narration. There's some dialogue, but mostly we're listening to Bonita or team leader Ben think things through. The Ben-narrated bits are short and mostly give us a little more insight into another underlying conflict as well as heightening the romantic tension.
The beginning of the story suffers a great deal from this sort of story-telling, as Gilman doesn't know when to cut it short, and Bonita thinks some of the same things in different ways. For instance, the significance to the team of being called to an active crime scene is remarked upon quite a bit--in her head. I suppose the reader is supposed to empathize with Bonita's feeling of internal pressure. This is the kind of thing that could have been taken care of with a little dialogue that would have given us more insight into other characters and more interest, period. I'm starting to see why so many reviewers thought it an unmemorable type of book; this style of narration lends itself to distance, and the lack of dialogue only encourages passivity.
The upshot, however, is that it's rather unusual to have a team of people who play equal roles in an urban fantasy. That's kind of a nice dynamic to see, and usually isn't complicated by the normal petty stuff many authors fall pray to (forced misunderstandings, personal drama over professional focus). It's a little annoying that there's still so much maleness around, and that despite hearing about Bonita being bisexual, we have little evidence of her scoping out women the way she does men (she considers a fatae male partner, refuses an offer to meet a woman partner, but does find a male partner). It honestly just doesn't feel like women are really integrated into the story, existing more as tokens (contrast again with my new fandom of Stephen Aryan who has more female than male main characters).
So, the non-dynamic storytelling (low re-readibility, despite my 2011 review) and lack of truly progressive character dynamics mean it's not personal library-worthy. Still, the plotting, generally intriguing set-up and non-full-on-irritatingness mean its a worthy UF distraction read. On Stephen's scale, that makes it a 'borrow.' show less
Five novels into this series, Gilman succeeded in scaring me that something bad might happen to the main characters. I wasn't sure they'd all survive this installment's big battle, and if they did survive I wasn't sure what kind of shape they'd be in afterward.
The nice thing about Gilman is how she carries plot points and character developments over from previous books. In her world, actions have consequences and don't get waved off. That makes me feel, as a reader, that the plot has show more consequence; Gilman isn't going to wave her authorial wand and retcon something that happened in a previous novel simply for the sake of convenience. It makes what happens more significant, and gives me a lot of confidence in the series.
I'll definitely buy book six when it comes out. I can't wait to see what happens next. show less
The nice thing about Gilman is how she carries plot points and character developments over from previous books. In her world, actions have consequences and don't get waved off. That makes me feel, as a reader, that the plot has show more consequence; Gilman isn't going to wave her authorial wand and retcon something that happened in a previous novel simply for the sake of convenience. It makes what happens more significant, and gives me a lot of confidence in the series.
I'll definitely buy book six when it comes out. I can't wait to see what happens next. show less
I'm not entirely sure how to categorize this book, as there are so many different aspects. A little mystery, a lot of magic, political drama and wild west survival, all wrapped up in the continuing adventures of Isobel and Gabriel, characters of charm and objects of fascination for me. I find the world enthralling and the story bewitching, and Gilman lays it all out as though she were walking a magical spell. If you liked Silver on the Road, this will not disappoint.
Advanced reader's copy show more provided by Edelweiss. show less
Advanced reader's copy show more provided by Edelweiss. show less
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 91
- Also by
- 47
- Members
- 6,837
- Popularity
- #3,574
- Rating
- 3.6
- Reviews
- 242
- ISBNs
- 232
- Languages
- 5
- Favorited
- 13



















