J. R. Dummelow

About the Author

Includes the names: J. Dummelow, Dummelow J. R., John R. Dummelow, Ed. J. R. Dummelow, Dummelow J. R. Rev, J. R. Dummelow ed., Rev. J.R. Dummelow, J.R. Dummelow (ed), J. R. Dummelow M.A., J.R. Editor Dummelow, Editor J. R. Dummelow, The Rev. J.R. Dummelow, J. R. The Rev Dummelow, Rev. J.R. ed. DUMMELOW, The Rev. J. R. Dummelow, editor Dummelow , J. R., J.R. (editor) Drummelow, Rev. J.R. Dummelow M. A., Rev J. R: (editor) Dummelow, The Rev. Dummelow, John R., M.A., Edited By The Rev. J. R. Dummelow, Rev. J. R. Dummelow (M.A. Cambridge)

Works by J. R. Dummelow

Popular Recent

The One Volume Bible Commentary (1909) 373 copies, 1 review

A Commentary on the Holy Bible: by various authors, Complete in One Volume (1974) 6 copies

One Volume Bible Commentary 2 copies

A Commentary on the Holy Bible By Various Writers (1946) 1 copy

Work Explorer

Tagged

220.7 (7) 220.7 DUM (2) ABC (3) adult non-fiction (2) Bible (30) Bible Commentaries (4) Bible Commentary (20) Bible Reference (4) Bible Study (8) Bible--Commentaries (10) Biblical Scholarship (2) Christian (2) Christianity (5) Commentaries (3) Commentary (39) FDRS-AC (2) H14 Bible Commentary (2) interpretation (2) maps (2) New Testament (3) non-fiction (5) Old and New Testament (2) Old Testament (2) OT Commentary (2) reference (15) religion (18) Scripture (4) study (2) Theology (3) Whole Bible Commentary (2)

Common Knowledge

Gender: male

Members

Reviews

Featured Recent Thumbs

1 review

jnote797 12 reviews

A Commentary on the Holy Bible by John R. Dummelow

The book SEEMS to be a mix of some orthodox doctrine and that influenced by higher critcism, depending on the introductory article read and the individual commentator. Examples: Tends toward non-Mosiac authorship of the Pentateuch; defines Genesis 1-11 as Hebrew tradition regarding the early history of the world and man; supports multiple authors of Isaiah; denies "that God would punish the innocent, or that for the sake of punishment inflicted on the innocent He could justly spare the show more guilty"; but appears to accept the bodily resurrection of Jesus, although it is possible I am being deceived by careful wording. I would welcome any comments if you have knowledge of this commentary or the character of commentaries written in that time period. I found interesting that when I did a search on the editor, I found the commentary referenced at the website, Zarahemia Research Foundation, an apologetic for the Book of Mormon. show less

Aug 8, 2008

1