Jack Conway (1) (1887–1952)

The one and only version to watch (and I've seen pretty much all of them); this is an annual view in our house and every year we hope maybe this time he won't go to the guillotine... and every year we cry. Special chops to Isabel Jewell, whose little seamstress breaks your heart in two (like this story needs more heartbreak!). And no one will EVER be Madame Defarge like Blanche Yurka. though I'd like to see Helena Bonham-Carter take a crack at it.

It's okay

I watched this one night after watching the 1989 James Wilby version, and in several ways I found it superior to that more recent one. The mob scenes in Paris had people stretching as far as the eye can see instead of topping out at maybe 30 or 40 rather harmless looking individuals. The muddy Dover road and the filthy Paris street where the wine cask broke seemed more authentic. I thought that both Stryver and Cruncher were more interesting in the 1935 version, and Colman's Carton show more definitely came across more sympathetically than Wilby's.

Nevertheless, I felt this movie was a pale imitation of the novel. Here are some the reasons:

1) The movie felt too American (almost like a Western) and too permeated with a chipper attitude.

2) While it's nice not to have Carton sulking throughout the movie, I think Colman's portrayal goes too far in the opposite direction. I feel that the Carton that Dickens created needed that night wandering the streets of Paris pondering life and death and salvation to give him the strength to go through with his sacrifice. The closing episode between Carton and the seamstress is one of the most powerful in literature, and it's disappointing that that episode loses so much power when translated to the screen.

3) I've got nothing against Christmas, but I disagree with the filmmaker's decision to turn this into a Christmas movie (complete with anachronistic Christmas carols).

4) Dickens was not just a good storyteller; he had a remarkable mastery of the English language. Of necessity, his text needs to be cut and pared in order to make a movie of reasonable length, but most dramatizations of his work seem to go far beyond what's necessary in replacing the author's words with words that the screenwriter/director/producer like better. I felt that this film didn't preserve as much of the author's magical phrasing as it might have. show less

2025 movie #101. 1934. Jane's old boyfriend leads a safari into the jungle to find an elephant graveyard to steal the ivory. He also hopes to get back Jane. Tarzan is having none of this. Pretty racy for its time, including an underwater naked swimming scene with Jane.

2024 movie #30. 1941. Everything goes wrong on their 4th wedding anniversary causing her to file for divorce and him to fake insanity to delay the proceedings. Mostly silly but with some good laughs. Loy and Powell made 13 movies together, movie goers loved them.