Picture of author.

Al Horowitz (1907–1973)

Author of Chess for Beginners

311+ Works 2,404 Members 28 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Works by Al Horowitz

Chess for Beginners (1950) 336 copies, 1 review
Chess Openings: Theory And Practice (1964) 201 copies, 2 reviews
How to Win in the Chess Openings (1981) 183 copies, 3 reviews
First Book of Chess (1963) — Author — 146 copies
Chess Self-Teacher (1961) 92 copies
The Golden Treasury of Chess (1943) — Editor — 90 copies, 2 reviews
How to Improve Your Chess (Primary) (1952) 84 copies, 1 review
Solitaire Chess (1962) 83 copies, 3 reviews
Winning Chess Tactics Illustrated (1963) 66 copies, 3 reviews
How to Win in the Chess Endings (1974) 54 copies, 1 review
Modern ideas in the chess openings, (1968) 53 copies, 2 reviews
All About Chess (1971) 50 copies, 1 review
New Traps In the Chess Opening (1966) 45 copies, 1 review
The Complete Book of Chess (1969) 41 copies, 1 review
The personality of chess (2015) 17 copies
MacMillan Handbook of Chess (1956) 13 copies
The Best in Chess (1965) 10 copies, 1 review
Learn Chess Quickly (1973) 5 copies
Chess: Games to Remember (1971) 4 copies
Chess Review Annual 1946 (1946) 2 copies

Associated Works

The Art of Sacrifice in Chess (1935) — Editor, some editions — 154 copies, 1 review
Joys of Chess (1974) — Introduction, some editions — 21 copies, 1 review

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Horowitz, Al
Legal name
Horowitz, Israel Albert
Other names
Horowitz, Israel A.
Horowitz, I. A.
Birthdate
1907-11-15
Date of death
1973-01-18
Gender
male
Nationality
USA
Associated Place (for map)
USA

Members

Reviews

35 reviews
This was one of the first chess books I owned. I won the brilliancy prize in my first national championship and this was it. I won it for a Scotch Gambit and I suppose this book might have encouraged me along such paths. In practice, however, this did not happen...maybe once I realised that the road to victory was paved with traps, pitfalls and swindles, it moved me towards ways of playing that would avoid that whole short, sharp, painful way to lose.

I'm a coward, what can I say?

Oh, for the show more record, Reinfeld is great. He went through a period of being denigrated for no more than being popular. Maybe he still is??? But he made chess fun. And if you owned, as I once did, a library of his obscure, early, roneoed publications in purple ink, you'd realise just how much he loved the game. show less
I am rating this as it strikes me now; I would have rated it higher (3 stars?) back the first time I wrote is some decades ago. Basically, I think it has not stood the test of time. Still, hoping that some day I can move my own chess play out of the novice level, I can see reason to recommend this work to other novices. This book often references specific pages in Winning Chess: How To See Three Moves Ahead, also co-written with Fred Reinfeld, so consider reading that first or at least show more having it on hand especially if you are especially new to chess. (the references are for pins, revealed checks, forks, and other strategic arrangements mentioned without explicit definition.)

Now, why I feel it is dated. First, this is a book celebrating the queen pawn opening and the Stonewall Attack. At the time I first read this I was playing often with newer chess software and computer devices. At the time, it seemed such machines could be easily fooled from such an opening. Now, I think modern ones are onto it. Those older chess computers had been vulnerable to the Stonewall because the positions are usually without clear tactical lines. White simply prepares for an assault by bringing pieces to aggressive posts, without making immediate tactical threats. By the time the computer realizes that its king is under attack, it is often too late. This, however, is not the case with newer chess computers. Even in the early '90s when I began to play others online at a site called Achess, others started to explicitly point out the inherent problems of leading with the queen pawn. The downsides to the Stonewall, specifically, are the hole on e4, and the fact that the dark-squared bishop on c1 is completely blocked by its own pawns. If Black defends correctly against White's attack, these strategic deficiencies can become quite serious. Because of this, the Stonewall Attack is almost never seen in master-level chess any more, let alone my own playing.

Still, study of the techniques here are valuable in advancing strategic thinking. For me, I think this has helped me incorporate a fianchetto generally or even "dragon" bishop in my play, this being a necessary response to the Stonewall walling in its own dark-squared bishop.

Another dating of this text is the use of "English" descriptive notation whereas I think anyone reading more modern texts will expect Algebraic chess notation, being more compact than descriptive chess notation and the most widely used method.

Stil being a product of its time and looking back, master-level games are used throughout a chapter for illustration, including some by Morphy (buried not far from my home) and Alexander Alekhine.

Interestingly, the author here places the work at a time when King pawn openings were being eclipsed by the then crafty Queen pawn ones:



In 1927, when Frank Marshall was preparing to sail for London to play in an international master tournament, he approached friends with the half-comic, half-plaintive query: "What defense shall I play against 1 P--Q4 ... ?" If one of the greatest players in the history of this game felt this way after thirty years, what are we mortals to say?

The fact is that finding a defense against 1 P--Q4 is no laughing matter! Most of us have been brought up on 1 P--K4, and we find something uncongenial in the lines of play which eveolve from 1 P--Q4.

show less
Of course, no one "wins" in an opening as such, and Horowitz wished in his foreword that marketing considerations would have allowed him to call this book How to Understand the Chess Openings. It is a sound resource for readers just getting their feet wet in chess strategy. He discusses the general principles that inform the openings in modern chess, after which each chapter is devoted to a specific opening or variant. Horowitz uses descriptive notation with ample diagrams, and provides very show more detailed discussion of the motives for each move.

A typical chapter includes a principal game to set forth the clinical logic of the opening, followed by one or more further examples in "movie" format, i.e. richly diagrammed, if more sparsely commented. Horowitz presents two of his own games among the chess movies, referencing himself in the third person, but mostly keeping to "white" and "black" for the players, unlike his usual movie narrative style.

Ten out of thirteen openings/variants treated are King Pawn openings, despite Horowitz's remark that "The unostentatious move 1 P-Q4 is nowadays considered the most effective way of beginning a game of chess. This is evinced by a preponderance of Queen Pawn games in modern master tournaments." (136) A single chapter treats the Queen's Gambit Declined, and the remaining two chapters are concerned with hypermodern openings that yield the center: the Reti (typically begun with N-KB3) and the English (P-QB4).
show less
Horowitz's wit shines through all the notation making this a really enjoyable read. It is fairly basic, covering some of the same stuff as my last review, "Chess In a Nutshell", i.e. basic rules, reading notation, et cetera.. "Chess for beginners" goes a bit deeper and may even have a very small learning curve for absolute newbies. Stalemate is looked at in depth, as are Sacrifices, Attacks, Combinations, Traps in the Opening, Pins, Forks, Piece Development--all these Horowitz covers while show more retaining reader interest and purveying an intelligent humor, which adds tremendously to any book.

After covering all of this, some Illustrative Games are provided: Scheve & Teichmann, Berlin 1907; Morphy & Amateur, New Orleans, 1858 (an amazing example of Odds-giving that proves Morphy as a true great); Sackman & Ricard, Albany, 1950; and finally Reinfeld (author of Chess In a Nutshell and others) & Grossman, National Intercollegiate Championship, 1929.

"Chess for beginners" uses descriptive notation and has many diagrams. As with any chess book, I recommend a pocket chess set to play out the notations for yourself.

The last chapter contains an essay by Donald MacMurry (a promising master who died at a tragically early age). It is from the very 1st issue of "Chess Review". It is titled "The Gentle Art of Annoying" and it is an absolute wondrous shining gem that will have you laughing out loud!
show less

Lists

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
311
Also by
3
Members
2,404
Popularity
#10,668
Rating
½ 3.6
Reviews
28
ISBNs
79
Languages
3
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs