Rebecca Lickiss

Never After is a fun read with some very entertaining twists on well-known fairy tales. I enjoyed the cantankerous Urticacea who put me in mind of a less-mad Madame Mimm from Disney's Sword in the Stone. And I really loved Vevila's common-sense approach to solving certain fairy-tale dilemmas which was funny and refreshing. And, honestly, how could you not like a story that involves a wizard who can speak only in Shakespeare?

There were some rough spots - I liked the way the courtship of show more Vevila was going, but I thought it ended rather abruptly and unsatisfactorily.. On the whole, though Rebecca Lickiss' Never After was highly enjoyable as a breezy, light-hearted comedy of errors based around fractured fairy tales and ending in the obligatory happily (hopefully) ever after.

More at my blog. show less

Fun. Neat deconstruction of standard fairy tale tropes, and well-written in the bargain. I want more by her.

This sounded like a fun idea. Fairies at the bottom of the garden, taken to a new level. It has a great tag-line: "The doctors said Piper Dickerson's grandmother died of old age. The elf said it was murder." That's all kinds of good – a very short encapsulation of how it all starts. But unfortunately the book was kind of a mess, and, while a quick and easy read, not much fun at all.

Eccentric is what it says on the front cover, and eccentric is what Lickiss makes every effort to provide. show more However, the full extent of the characters' unconventionality is dressing oddly and giving children twee names – oh, and collecting and reading books of more than two genres and to what onlookers consider excess. The main character, Piper Pied (who spends a considerable amount of first-person narrative space complaining about her and her brother's and cousins' god-awful name and musing about why none of them change them), is not very eccentric – she is the black sheep of normalcy in a peculiar family, which can be a great angle, done well. (It's fairly obvious, I think, what the next sentence might be, if I wanted to write it.) True eccentricity, either in the characters or the writing or the plot, would have been a major asset.

My assumption (geometry class having been a long time ago) was that the title, besides referring to the so-eccentric Pied/Dickerson family, was a play on "concentric circles". But it apparently isn't; the actual definition makes some sense, I think, given the conception of how the mundane world and Fairy converge, but given that not a soul in the book is indicated as having the least mathematical aptitude, the title is another grafted-on oddity.

Added to the mild frustration existing with the idea and the plot and the characters is a mild frustration with the editing. There are random, commas all throughout, and some odd and awkward moments in which a character answers a question that was never asked. And, finally, it's a terrible shame when a publisher pays so little attention to the manuscript that the main character's name is gotten wrong on the book's back cover. "Piper Dickerson" is how she appears there. But Grandma was a Dickerson. Piper is a Pied. How very sad.

(Longer version on my blog: http://agoldoffish.wordpress.com/) show less

Unassuming, friendly. Literally about patching the holes in the fairy-verse by writing a Mary-Sue story. Reasonably entertaining if you know to expect a Twilight-style silhouette of a protagonist. The rest of the (human) characters were interesting enough that I almost wished the book was longer. If you're writing small-town contemporary fantasy, don't crib in an epic plot, that's what I say.