Edward E. Baptist

After I read it, I understand why the Economist gave it such a defensive, racist review. This book, more than any I can remember reading, confronts non-black Americans, and to a certain extent citizens of other countries like Britain, with exactly how much of white American wealth and industrialization, which also made many others wealthy or comfortable, depended on the systematic torture of African and African-American people. The book does so both with the horrendous facts, but also with show more its language, which does not allow readers to gloss over the past. There are no plantations in this book, only slave labor camps. There are no masters, only enslavers—enslavement was an active thing, a thing that kept happening, that was maintained regularly and voluntarily, including by lots and lots of people who never enslaved others themselves—and Baptist often speaks of enslaved people rather than slaves, reminding us both of their humanity and the ongoing nature of their mistreatment.

There is rape and there is fucking; Baptist, like other historians, links the violent white male culture of the South with the domination they were pleased to exercise over enslaved people and the necessity they felt of showing other whites that they were “free” and not enslaved. This freedom was freedom to steal (land, people), rape, kill, whip, and otherwise torture blacks as well as freedom to assault and even kill any white man who “insulted” them. The greed of capitalist expansion was funded by ever more efficient extraction of cotton production through the torture of enslaved people, using quantification and individualization of quotas combined with the reduction of slaves to interchangeable “hands.” This greed was connected to the other risk-taking behavior of enslavers as well as to their greed for the bodies of enslaved women, whom they were free to rape. Sexual access to those women also asserted power over white women, functioning as proof that these white men were governed only by themselves: that they did the whipping.

Baptist argues that it’s a reassuring lie to say that slavery was economically inefficient, as we are often taught today. With the mechanisms enslavers developed to break down social bonds between enslaved people; to torture them so terrifyingly that they’d work desperately to avoid the torture; and to create an efficient market for slaves, including credit and securitization, slavery was a wealth-generating machine the likes of which had never been seen before. Slaves learned to innovate and become ever more productive in order to gain some small, temporary protection from the torture. Slavery made some white men very, very wealthy, both in the North and the South, and the institutions we have today are still benefiting from the wealth extracted from enslaved people and allocated to white people. show less

Follow the money

The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of Modern Capitalism by Edward E. Baptist (Basic Books, $35), published 9/9/14.



One of the refrains from uncomfortable white people who don’t want to deal with the frustration and anger of the African American descendants of enslaved people turn to is “Slavery’s over, and it had nothing to do with me!”

(Or, in the case of the reviewer for The Economist, “It wasn’t that bad, anyway.”)

In Edward E. Baptist’s show more meticulously-researched and clearly written history of the relationship between slavery and the American economic system, The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of Modern Capitalism, there’s more than enough evidence to put lie to any soothing claim that the historically-impaired and over-privileged descendants of the people who profited from slavery might make.

Baptist painstakingly makes clear that the United States’ rise to economic powerhouse was built, piece by piece, not simply on the labor of slaves but on their use as securitized assets. Any wealth inherited from our white ancestors most likely has, at its roots, some connection to the profits made off enslaving others—and that’s certainly a piece of evidence worth considering as we conduct our discussions of persistent racial inequality in America.

It’s impossible to state more clearly than this: The Half Has Never Been Told is proof that racial inequality started with the bank book, and that may very well be the only way to address it.

Reviewed on Lit/Rant: www.litrant.tumblr.com show less

Probably one of the best non-fiction books I've ever read, definitely the best within the genre of historical subjects (including biographies and memoirs).

The theft of human lives leading to "...the violence of separation... in order to deploy people as commodities at the entrepreneurial edge of the modern world economy." (pg.188)

Author Edward Baptist's thesis that the expansion of the geographic area of practice of enslavement within the young United States and intensification of use of show more those enslaved drove the country onto the world stage as an economic player and powerhouse. Examination of the political, sociological and psychological rationale, and religious and financial/economic factors abound throughout the text, for which the author presents the course of the years from approximately 1790 to 1860 (and beyond) within the analogy of parts of the body.

Effective use of narrative gives the idea that (echoing anther GoodReads reviewer) one is immersed within a novel, and by revisiting events from different perspective in various chapters drives home the calamity, the insensitivity, the brashness and lack of foresight undertaken by the enslavers of the King Cotton era.

Baptist's endnotes/bibliography/references appear to solidly support the presentation, and the text abounds in points that make one step back, breathe deeply, and really think... drawing one into the lives of those about whom you are reading... there's a personal perspective to the events that one really feels about those who lived, existed, died, contributed to or survived that period.

The repercussions of that period are still felt in today's world.

“Slavery permitted unchecked dominance and unlimited fulfillment of unrestrained desire.” (pg.234)

“People rarely have sufficient information to measure the consequences of one act or another... pure rationality does not always drive people's actions, even—and sometimes especially—their “economic” ones.” (pg.235) show less

The book very skillfully mixes a wrenching portrayal of individual human suffering, gleaned from oral histories of former slaves, with a solid economic history of the U.S. economy during the slave era. It's a powerful combination. Baptist's strongly supported thesis is that the economic growth of the 18th and 19th centuries was fueled neither by entrepreneurial drive, nor by technical innovation, but instead by the toil of enslaved people. Having read the book, this feels very obvious to me show more now, but as I was reading it I could feel my own resistance to Baptist's thesis, because I have been taught well over many years to believe otherwise--that the plantation economy of South as well as slavery itself were backward economic institutions that were destined to be overwhelmed by the capital-intense North. But who bought all that cotton, who turned it into textiles, who profited from cheap cotton? Who benefitted most from cotton being produced by free labor? Not just the South. By laying out very carefully the flow of money, credit, land development and slave labor, from the late 18th to mid-19th century, Baptist leaves the reader with a very strong understanding of how all white Americans, not just those in the South, benefitted from the subjection of African Americans into slavery.

Baptist, a Cornell history professor, breaks out of academic-speak altogether and presents the material in unique ways. I felt his narrative creativity served to jolt me out of any received wisdom about slavery so I could think in new ways. In one section Baptist writes for example from the point of view of a dying man, a leader of a slave revolt at the moment of his execution. Less flamboyantly but even more effectively for me, Baptist consistently replaces the word "slaves" with "enslaved people." That may sound like a small difference, but it reframed the fact of slavery in a new, more factual way.The word "slave" has been used up, in a way, to the point where it is very hard to divorce the word from the centuries-old idea of a "happy slave" being cared for by paternalistic "masters." "Enslaved people" gets back to the heart of the atrocity, back to the bare fact of a person held against their will and entirely at the mercy of another human being.

It's a book that causes heartache, as it should. It's very hard to look straight at this topic and see it for all its horror. It also left me with the feeling that very little has changed, when I think about how much of U.S. economic growth still depends on the labor of the powerless, whether it be farm workers here in the U.S., or the near-slave labor making everything from shirts to semiconductors overseas. This greater criticism of capitalism is not in any way a part of Baptist's thesis, which is wide-ranging enough as it is...but even so, the book led me to certain kinds of conclusions about how the rapid accumulation of wealth in any capitalist economy seems to depend on the subjugation of others. show less