Book Dimensions

TalkCommon Knowledge, WikiThing, HelpThing

Join LibraryThing to post.

Book Dimensions

This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.

1benuathanasia
Jan 11, 2012, 1:02 am

I'm American, so LibraryThing thinks I want to use inches and pounds. Having studied engineering, I HATE inches and pounds. Is there a way to change ALL my dimensions to centimeters and kilograms? I've figured out how to do it book by book, but with 2,500 books...that's just ridiculous.

2Ravic
Jan 11, 2012, 11:59 pm

Seconded.

Yes, please. I'm European and I also urgently need that facility. If it existed I would start entering data. But not if it has to be done for each book separately.

3birder4106
Jan 12, 2012, 3:09 am

Oh yes please

4anglemark
Jan 12, 2012, 4:14 am

Yes, I've also ignored this feature because of this. Inches and pounds mean nothing to me.

5jjwilson61
Jan 12, 2012, 9:54 am

Perhaps you should put this in the Recommended Site Improvements group. I'm not sure how many people follow this group.

6PhaedraB
Jan 14, 2012, 9:07 am

I've found that the inches/metric depends on from where I've imported the book. Personally, I change it all to inches/pounds, so it's something I notice. And I have to change it often. So it's probably not LT, it's probably your sources.

7ed.pendragon
Jan 14, 2012, 12:51 pm

Coming from the country that gave the US feet and inches and pounds weight and gallons, when the UK decimalised and metricised in the 70s it was assumed that old people would have real difficulties making the adjustment.

But four decades on I (as one who is in his sixties) get irritated by people my age unable to (a) mostly think metric or even (b) work out the equivalent. Even though we still (just) drink pints in pubs, all our volumes and product weights and recipes are metric, and even though we still drive miles down our roads most lengths are metric. (But, yes, I see that British publishers still routinely use inches in their dimensions.)

Surely those who use 'imperial' (as Brits used to call it) are in a global minority? Why can't LT give us readers the option at least of switching? (I don't care if they're spelled millimeters or millimetres, by the way.)

8benuathanasia
Jan 14, 2012, 1:02 pm

@ed.pendragon
Please copy/paste your comment over in http://www.librarything.com/topic/130892 where the fight is ensuing. I just said the same thing you did, but some others said that it's a useless feature.

9brightcopy
Jan 14, 2012, 1:59 pm

There's no fight. Everyone on the thread agrees the option should be there.

10benuathanasia
Jan 14, 2012, 2:07 pm

Fight as in the fight for the idea, not people fighting each other. Although post 11 did sound like they thought the idea was dumb.

11jjwilson61
Edited: Jan 14, 2012, 2:10 pm

And I bet Tim agrees in principle. It's only a matter of deciding that it's worth the resources to make the change.

And if you're wondering why you haven't heard from Tim, I haven't seen his presence on the forums for most of the week. He must be wrapped up in something else.

12benuathanasia
Jan 14, 2012, 2:19 pm

I don't think I've ever expected to hear from Tim, himself.
I just originally posted to ask how to do it (assuming, since that's fairly standard on many sites, that it would be something that already exists) and then you told me to put it on recommendations since it doesn't exist yet and I didn't see it on the list of things to do (http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/User:Zoe/RSI_data_ranking).

And I can't imagine it would take too much resources since it already exists (kind of/sort of) on a book by book basis. It they got rid of the dimension field in the individual books that says "convert to..." and made that a profile or library option of some kind you could reassign the resources. I can't imagine anyone would want SOME of their books metric, and SOME of their books imperial.

13jjwilson61
Jan 14, 2012, 4:54 pm

I have no idea how much work it would actually take to do it but having it on a book basis does not mean it's easy to do it on a user basis. You're talking about fields in totally different data structures.

14PatZRH
Nov 5, 2019, 6:30 pm

Please, can we make kilos and centimeters an optional setting? Being from Europe, that would make everything so much easier...

15birder4106
Nov 6, 2019, 2:09 am

And please enable saving the file size of electronic media in MBytes / KBytes.

16ScarletBea
Nov 6, 2019, 4:08 am

>14 PatZRH: That option has always existed since I've been on LT.
When you're editing your book, there's a very clear option of "Convert all physical measurements to kg/cm or pounds/inches" in that box, just click the one you want. I always convert mine and input the right measures.

17.mau.
Nov 6, 2019, 10:00 am

>16 ScarletBea: I understand that >1 benuathanasia: would like to have a global user preference for which units to show by default.

18bnielsen
Nov 7, 2019, 3:42 am

>17 .mau.:. Agreed. Also agree that this is a small pain each time I add a book. (I imagine the AI taking care of the user interface: Hmm, he has selected cm/kg about 3500 times so far. Let's detault to inches/pounds yet again). At least it is not ounces as my kitchen weight chooses once in a while when it is low on batteries. (Ah, maybe that's the cause: LT is low on batteries?).