Not Naked

Very large discrepancy between the status of the illustrated man on the front cover and the descriptive title of the work! I mean, this guy is the definition of not naked - he is wearing everything including the fish's bowl.

I don't know what that thing is that he has in his hands, but I'm glad I'm not on the other end of it....

No nudity? Then they Faked to the Stars.

If he’s flying high, maybe he went Baked to the Stars.

I think he overslept and just threw on whatever he could grab from last night's fancy dress party, as he Waked to the Stars.

Waked to the stars and overslept tends to imply winter and high-ish latitude. So plenty of clothes does seem called for.

Well, there are a lot of moons on the cover. Does that count?

When you're a star, he lets you do it.

It amuses me how that bubble helmet 1 has a little hole on top to let through the spike on his helmet. Must make moving his head a little difficult.

Those are a LOT of Moons. Indeed, an impossible number: either there's a glitch in the simulation, That's No Moons but rather an orbital structure, it's a metaphor for the passage of time, or the artist doesn't give a crap and just thought a whole row of moons kinda tied the picture together.

1 Presumably for an unbreathable atmosphere rather than vacuum, since his hands are Naked to the Stars

I think we had this at the old place, and the run of puns is certainly how we did it back then.

Also referencing a GSS meme: is he Outstanding In His Field?

This has had a lot of different covers. This is probably the worst one -- in English, anyway.