Language List: change "English (Middle)" to "Middle English", etc. (or vice-versa)
Talk Recommend Site Improvements
Join LibraryThing to post.
1LeslieWx
In the full pull-down Languages list, we can find
"Old English", "Old French", "Old Irish", "Old Norse", and "Old Persian";
"Middle Irish";
"Low German";
AND
"Dutch (Middle)", "English (Middle)", "French (Middle)", "German (Middle High)", "German (Old High)", and "Greek (Ancient)".
Also we can find Langue d'Oc (post-1500), Occitan(post-1500), and Provençal (to 1500). All other parentheticals seem to me to be either "(Other)" or a geographical/political designation, e.g. "English (UK)".
The inconsistency among the placement of the Ancient/Old/Middle/High/Low modifiers is confusing & misleading. I see "Old English", "Low German", and "Ancient Greek" used in books and articles; if I'm looking for "Middle English" and find only "Middle Irish", why would I hunt back to the "E" section? Similarly, if I see "Old English" and 4 others but not "Old High German", how picky or procrastinating would I have to be to hunt the "G"s?
"Old English", "Old French", "Old Irish", "Old Norse", and "Old Persian";
"Middle Irish";
"Low German";
AND
"Dutch (Middle)", "English (Middle)", "French (Middle)", "German (Middle High)", "German (Old High)", and "Greek (Ancient)".
Also we can find Langue d'Oc (post-1500), Occitan(post-1500), and Provençal (to 1500). All other parentheticals seem to me to be either "(Other)" or a geographical/political designation, e.g. "English (UK)".
The inconsistency among the placement of the Ancient/Old/Middle/High/Low modifiers is confusing & misleading. I see "Old English", "Low German", and "Ancient Greek" used in books and articles; if I'm looking for "Middle English" and find only "Middle Irish", why would I hunt back to the "E" section? Similarly, if I see "Old English" and 4 others but not "Old High German", how picky or procrastinating would I have to be to hunt the "G"s?
2jjwilson61
There's an argument to list them both ways to make them easier to find, but the list is so long already...
3LeslieWx
>2 jjwilson61: There's an argument to list them both ways to make them easier to find
Yes, I can see that argument, too. Consistency was the first solution that came to mind, though.
, but the list is so long already...
I had No Idea how long still I scrolled through it over and over collecting data for my RSI!! Although having done that I have to say that I don't think I'd notice if it were 13 elements longer LOL.
I leave calculating the percentage increase that 13 more elements would represent as an exercise for a reader ...
Yes, I can see that argument, too. Consistency was the first solution that came to mind, though.
, but the list is so long already...
I had No Idea how long still I scrolled through it over and over collecting data for my RSI!! Although having done that I have to say that I don't think I'd notice if it were 13 elements longer LOL.
I leave calculating the percentage increase that 13 more elements would represent as an exercise for a reader ...

