Popularity statistics are missing

TalkBug Collectors

Join LibraryThing to post.

Popularity statistics are missing

1Katya0133
Jun 10, 10:15 pm

If you go to the "monthly" section under the popularity statistics, you'll see that apparently no one has read Pride and Prejudice in the past three months!

https://www.librarything.com/work/2773690/social/286678626#section_popularity

2Charon07
Jun 10, 10:46 pm

>1 Katya0133: It’s not the end of the second quarter yet. I suspect the quarterly, monthly, and cumulative statistics might not get updated until sometime after June 30.

3knerd.knitter
Jun 11, 8:08 am

The months had run out; this should be fixed in the next day or so.

4Katya0133
Jun 11, 10:50 pm

5knerd.knitter
Jun 15, 10:47 am

>4 Katya0133: I know this is still not right. I'm working on fixing it now. It'll probably be another couple days before it's resolved.

6timspalding
Jun 15, 2:08 pm

The reason, by the way, is that the months were tracked with a "LibraryThing month" based on when we started. We have now more months than will fit in a byte (255). So Lucy's having to "roll over" some very large tables to make them use two bytes :)

7Katya0133
Jun 15, 2:26 pm

Awwww, LibraryThing's big enough to need two bytes now!

8waltzmn
Jun 15, 3:15 pm

>6 timspalding: Two bytes? Aren't you worried about the Y7466 problem? Surely it should be four bytes. :-)

Or are you that short on storage? :-p

9bnielsen
Jun 15, 4:22 pm

>6 timspalding: You should have kept the CDC mainframe so you could use 12 bits :-)

10waltzmn
Jun 15, 4:33 pm

>9 bnielsen: Wasn't a byte on a CDC mainframe 6 bits? 60 bit words.... So they'd have had to address this problem fifteen years ago. :-)

11bnielsen
Jun 15, 5:13 pm

>10 waltzmn: Yes, sort of. Input was done via something that always gave you 12 bits. But you could always chop up the 60-bit word in your own way, so maybe LT could just have crept up from ... 7 to 8 to 9 bit to 10 bit :-)

12waltzmn
Jun 15, 7:42 pm

>11 bnielsen: What I remembered, back when I was working with a Cyber mainframe a bit more than forty years ago, was that you couldn't have lower case, because they didn't use ASCII; it was 64-symbol character set. So: 6 bit words. But they didn't teach us how it worked; they basically said, "Shut up and keypunch."

I went back to a college with newer computers. :-)

13bnielsen
Jun 15, 9:52 pm

>12 waltzmn: Before that it was a 63-symbol character set (they didn't have a %-sign in that version). So my knowledge is older than yours by a percent :-)

14waltzmn
Jun 15, 10:00 pm

>13 bnielsen: Or you cared enough to remember the details, at least. :-)

15bnielsen
Jun 15, 10:22 pm

>14 waltzmn: I remember also using DEC Radix 50 charset at that time. (Our university used both a Dec-10 and a CDC-computer in those days).