1jjmcgaffey
So I finally got around to testing adding a book I already had to add a new read date. And it does in fact do exactly what it says it does - _replaces_ the read date (all of them? not sure) with the imported data. I love that LT lets me keep track of my read dates, and this import function is the opposite of useful (thank goodness it occurred to me to test it before I imported 119 books with new read dates!).
Not sure this is technically a bug - it may be a RSI request instead. But I don't understand why this is a option at all - given that it's a multi-entry field, why would anyone want to _replace_ the already entered data?
Not sure this is technically a bug - it may be a RSI request instead. But I don't understand why this is a option at all - given that it's a multi-entry field, why would anyone want to _replace_ the already entered data?
