Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Doctor Faustus (1994)by Christopher Marlowe
» 36 more AP Lit (13) Favourite Books (955) Folio Society (430) Well-Educated Mind (28) 100 World Classics (69) Books Read in 2020 (1,437) Read (62) Books Read in 2018 (2,173) Books Read in 2021 (4,482) Plays I Like (38) 17th Century (11) Best Horror Mega-List (196) SHOULD Read Books! (142) Faust legend (1) Book wishlist (56) Unread books (624) Best Horror Books (250) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. It is recognisable for its influence, and the "don't aspire beyond the human limits of knowledge" is a tale as old as time itself, but this still holds up magnificently, which I wasn't expecting. A play written in blank verse with the theme of a repentant God, an unrepentant Devil, and a human having sold his soul to the latter in exchange for knowledge and relief from boredom sounds (and is) exciting. It helps that Marlowe keeps it simple, doesn't get too preachy, and fills up the gaps nicely even with a foregone conclusion. TL;DR - don't sell your soul to the Devil, with a capital D - who would have guessed? Not the best Norton Critical that I've come across. A very spare introduction, and rather short on context considering how much there was going on at the time (though there is a healthy dollop of faustbook). A good comparison is the equivalent edition of The Tempest, which seems to do much more with much less. Seems to lean rather heavily on Calvinism as context for the play, taking the difference between the faustbook and Doctor Faustus as mostly theological. This is an interesting approach and offers some good insights on the play (and Marlowe's formative years), but the scope is rather narrow for a Norton Critical. Both the A and B text are provided, naturally with modernized spelling/punctuation. This is not a side-by-side edition: you read them in sequence. Being short, this works fine, and the differences between the two are what make up most of the introduction. I'd recommend supplementing this with the first 3 sections of [b:Lives of Faust: The Faust Theme in Literature and Music: A Reader|7054766|Lives of Faust The Faust Theme in Literature and Music A Reader|Lorna Fitzsimmons|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1381304452s/7054766.jpg|7305946] to get a more complete analysis of the play. As for the play itself, five stars for anything by Marlowe. no reviews | add a review
Is contained inIs retold inHas the adaptationHas as a studyHas as a commentary on the textHas as a student's study guide
"Doctor Faustus is a classic; its imaginative boldness and vertiginous ironies have fascinated readers and playgoers alike. But the fact that this play exists in two early versions, printed in 1604 and 1616, has posed formidable problems for critics. How much of either version was written by Marlowe, and which is the more authentic? Is the play orthodox or radically interrogative?" "Michael Keefer's early work helped to establish the current consensus that the 1604 version best preserves Doctor Faustus's original form, and that the 1616 text was censored and revised; the first Broadview edition, praised for its lucid introduction and scholarship, was the first to restore two displaced scenes to their correct place. All competing editions presume that the 1604 text was printed from authorial manuscript, and that the 1616 text is of little substantive value. But in 2006 Keefer's fresh analysis of the evidence showed that the 1604 quarto's Marlovian scenes were printed from a corrupted manuscript, and that the 1616 quarto (though indeed censored and revised) preserves some readings earlier than those of the 1604 text." "This revised and updated Broadview edition offers the best available text of Doctor Faustus. Keefer's critical introduction reconstructs the ideological contexts that shaped and deformed the play, and the text is accompanied by textual and explanatory notes and excerpts from sources."--BOOK JACKET. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)822.3Literature English English drama Elizabethan 1558-1625LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
The play is a medium-paced story written in typical classical style. Considering it was penned sometime between 1589-1592, the content is fairly readable and the theme is surprisingly relevant more than 430 years later. Well, I guess human nature doesn’t change in sync with societal advancements!
The story is based on the German legend of Faust. The eponymous Faustus, a renowned scholar, is bored with his life and starts dabbling in occult magic/ He ends up signing a deal with devil: his soul in return for twenty four years of power and knowledge. He makes the most of these two dozen years, meeting heads of the church and the state, and travelling across the country showing off his prowess. But when the sands of his gifted time come to an end, he cries and turns to God for forgiveness. And what do you think happens?
The book is a classic portrayal of the vagaries of human nature and how people remember God only in times of trouble. It is pretty well-written and quite interesting, though a tad more religious than I had expected. I can see why Christopher Marlowe was considered a talented dramatist in London until his untimely death changed the focus over to Shakespeare.
3.5 stars from me, rounding up to 4. I might have enjoyed it more had I actually read it or heard a better audio version. The Librivox recording was average.
***********************
Join me on the Facebook group, Readers Forever!, for more reviews, book-related discussions and fun. ( )