Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
by Pierre Bourdieu
On This Page
Description
No judgement of taste is innocent - we are all snobs. Pierre Bourdieu ?s Distinction brilliantly illuminates the social pretentions of the middle classes in the modern world, focusing on the tastes and preferences of the French bourgeoisie. First published in 1979, the book is at once a vast ethnography of contemporary France and a dissection of the bourgeois mind. In the course of everyday life we constantly choose between what we find aesthetically pleasing, and what we consider tacky, show more merely trendy, or ugly. Taste is not pure. Bourdieu demonstrates that our different aesthetic choices are all distinctions - that is, choices made in opposition to those made by other classes. This fascinating work argues that the social world functions simultaneously as a system of power relations and as a symbolic system in which minute distinctions of taste become the basis for social judgement. show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
Dense, dated, and at times unnecessarily convoluted—but also genuinely fascinating in its exploration of how taste is shaped by class, education, and social structures. I couldn’t always tell whether the writing style was simply academic or quietly gatekeeping, but the core ideas are strong enough to push through the difficulty.
As someone interested in how people construct meaning (and perhaps feeling slightly outside those structures myself), I found it particularly compelling—especially reading it as an American now living in England, where class operates very differently but just as persistently. It also led to some mildly unsettling self-reflection on where my own tastes sit versus where I’d place myself socially.
Not an easy show more read, and certainly not for everyone, but one I really enjoyed and will likely return to—if only to bring it up at dinner parties and tipsy midnight sessions. show less
As someone interested in how people construct meaning (and perhaps feeling slightly outside those structures myself), I found it particularly compelling—especially reading it as an American now living in England, where class operates very differently but just as persistently. It also led to some mildly unsettling self-reflection on where my own tastes sit versus where I’d place myself socially.
Not an easy show more read, and certainly not for everyone, but one I really enjoyed and will likely return to—if only to bring it up at dinner parties and tipsy midnight sessions. show less
It's dated, overlong, and the prose is convoluted; however, the insights into the social construction of taste are thought provoking. Why do we like what we like? How much of our preferences are due to class envy, education, or economic circumstances?
The final chapter, on Kant's Critique of Judgment, shows how even so-called pure aesthetics is "grounded in an empirical social relation," how pleasure itself becomes part of the way "dominant groups...ride roughshod over difference, flouts distinction, [and] reduces the distinctive pleasures of the soul to the common satisfactions of food and sex."
Bourdieu also makes prescient comments on the tendencies of statisticians and sociologists to create artificial dichotomies and ends up show more suggesting that intellectuals may not be best placed to comment on bourgeois and working class taste. show less
The final chapter, on Kant's Critique of Judgment, shows how even so-called pure aesthetics is "grounded in an empirical social relation," how pleasure itself becomes part of the way "dominant groups...ride roughshod over difference, flouts distinction, [and] reduces the distinctive pleasures of the soul to the common satisfactions of food and sex."
Bourdieu also makes prescient comments on the tendencies of statisticians and sociologists to create artificial dichotomies and ends up show more suggesting that intellectuals may not be best placed to comment on bourgeois and working class taste. show less
Dense, but critical for understanding the connection between economic capital and cultural capital.
Wonderful work of obfuscation.
Hemingway is my favorite author. I read this after being determined to read whatever I could find by Hemingway. It may help that I'm originally from Florida and I like to drink ...
(just a few chapters for class)
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste by Pierre Bourdieu (2002)
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
culture
320 works; 1 member
Yet another list
67 works; 1 member
Mo's Reading List
218 works; 1 member
Sociology
18 works; 1 member
Author Information
Awards and Honors
Series
Belongs to Publisher Series
Common Knowledge
- Original title
- La Distinction, Critique social du jugement
- Original publication date
- 1979
- First words
- I have every reason to fear that this book will strike the reader as 'very French' - which I know is not always a compliment.
- Original language
- French
Classifications
- Genres
- Sociology, Nonfiction, Literature Studies and Criticism, Philosophy
- DDC/MDS
- 306.0944 — Society, government, & culture Social sciences, sociology & anthropology Social Behavior - Dating, Marriage, Divorce Social history Europe France And Monaco
- LCC
- DC33.7 .B6513 — History of Europe, Asia, Africa and Oceania France – Andorra – Monaco History of France
- BISAC
Statistics
- Members
- 1,647
- Popularity
- 13,624
- Reviews
- 9
- Rating
- (3.98)
- Languages
- 9 — English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian (Bokmål), Polish, Spanish, Portuguese (Portugal)
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 36
- ASINs
- 9























































