HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Combat and Genocide on the Eastern Front: The German Infantry's War, 1941-1944

by Jeff Rutherford

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
321750,922 (4)1
By 1944, the overwhelming majority of the German Army had participated in the German war of annihilation in the Soviet Union and historians continue to debate the motivations behind the violence unleashed in the east. Jeff Rutherford offers an important new contribution to this debate through a study of combat and the occupation policies of three frontline infantry divisions. He shows that while Nazi racial ideology provided a legitimizing context in which violence was not only accepted but encouraged, it was the Wehrmacht's adherence to a doctrine of military necessity which is critical in explaining why German soldiers fought as they did. This meant that the German Army would do whatever was necessary to emerge victorious on the battlefield. Periods of brutality were intermixed with conciliation as the army's view and treatment of the civilian population evolved based on its appreciation of the larger context of war in the east.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 1 mention

In this dense monograph the author seeks to plumb the foundations of criminality in the German army in the Second World War and finds that while, yes, socialization into the Nazi worldview did contribute to the violence, the real catalyst was the German military's attitude that "military necessity" was the consideration that superseded all others; this being a polite term for how any extremity in the pursuit of victory was justified. As such, most of the damage done by German soldiers had less to do with field massacres, and more to do with the systematic looting of the Soviet civilian population for food, clothing and shelter. This is an important point to make, the only issue being that having read the works of David Stahel this is not exactly a fresh insight for me at this point.

Apart from this Rutherford also does a service by backing up the higher analysis with case studies of a number of German infantry divisions; the East Prussian 121st, the Berliners of the 123rd and the mostly Catholic Rhinelanders of 126th. Units that could be called "ordinary" if you will. The main point here being that Germany was still sufficiently variegated that Nazi calls for racial violence did have different degrees of traction depending on a unit's recruitment region.

On the whole, highly recommended. ( )
  Shrike58 | Oct 21, 2020 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

By 1944, the overwhelming majority of the German Army had participated in the German war of annihilation in the Soviet Union and historians continue to debate the motivations behind the violence unleashed in the east. Jeff Rutherford offers an important new contribution to this debate through a study of combat and the occupation policies of three frontline infantry divisions. He shows that while Nazi racial ideology provided a legitimizing context in which violence was not only accepted but encouraged, it was the Wehrmacht's adherence to a doctrine of military necessity which is critical in explaining why German soldiers fought as they did. This meant that the German Army would do whatever was necessary to emerge victorious on the battlefield. Periods of brutality were intermixed with conciliation as the army's view and treatment of the civilian population evolved based on its appreciation of the larger context of war in the east.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 1
3.5
4 4
4.5
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,862,736 books! | Top bar: Always visible