HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable (2016)

by Amitav Ghosh

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
485850,360 (4.02)1
"Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability--at the level of literature, history, and politics--to grasp the scale and violence of climate change. The extreme nature of today's climate events, Ghosh asserts, makes them peculiarly resistant to contemporary modes of thinking and imagining. This is particularly true of serious literary fiction: hundred-year storms and freakish tornadoes simply feel too improbable for the novel; they are automatically consigned to other genres. In the writing of history, too, the climate crisis has sometimes led to gross simplifications; Ghosh shows that the history of the carbon economy is a tangled global story with many contradictory and counterintuitive elements. Ghosh ends by suggesting that politics, much like literature, has become a matter of personal moral reckoning rather than an arena of collective action. But to limit fiction and politics to individual moral adventure comes at a great cost. The climate crisis asks us to imagine other forms of human existence--a task to which fiction, Ghosh argues, is the best suited of all cultural forms. His book serves as a great writer's summons to confront the most urgent task of our time."--Jacket.… (more)
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 1 mention

Showing 1-5 of 8 (next | show all)
One of those landmark books that significantly influenced my worldview. Highly recommended! ( )
  harsharaghuram | Mar 8, 2024 |
I believe the climate crisis is real, that it is caused by humans, and that we urgently need to change our lifestyles to prevent the destruction of the planet. It's important that I say these things explicitly and up front so that nobody interprets my dislike of this book as some sort of climate change denial.

As I was reading this book I had the strongest feeling of sitting in a boring college lecture, one inside of those big halls with stadium seating and the professor monologuing at you in the front. Well, when I get to the last page and see the acknowledgements, lo and behold, he states that the book is based on a series of lectures that he gave. Zero surprise here. None.

We are decades away from the days when bad writing was the price we paid for reading non-fiction. The author should either have stepped up and done the necessary work of turning these lectures into an engaging book, or just condensed them into a 5 minute TED Talk and left it at that. ( )
  blueskygreentrees | Jul 30, 2023 |
It was all interesting until the author realized he had no solutions for the problems he presented and punted to religion. More than punting, he gushed over Pope Francis and claimed religious groups would save us. Are those the religious groups that fight against women's rights? LGBT+ rights? Appealing to a Pope who is complicit with child sexual abuse, among other things, is disgusting. If you read it, the first part gives you some things to think about, which is why it still gets three stars. As I come to my senses, I will likely make it a two. Though my conscious is telling me it should be a 1 just for this stupid stance. ( )
  LeeFisher | Jun 3, 2023 |
This book by Amitav Ghosh is an interesting one. The man has a lyrical manner of writing, and it was a pleasure to read the book just for the writing.

Amitav Ghosh does bring in a lot of linkages between climate change - as he has experienced it, the arts, and political thought.

I like the title of the book. We are deranged if we seek to deny the reality of climate change. He has contrasted the difference between the West and the East quite well.

We have forgotten the old ways. Will nature force us to remember them? ( )
1 vote RajivC | Jul 20, 2020 |
The Great Derangement is Amitav Ghosh's attempt to understand why we make such terrible decisions when it comes to dealing with climate change. His thesis, if it can be summed up, is that both capitalism and colonialism created global inequities of power and wealth that would need to be dismantled for climate action to succeed, at least without compromising the freedom-and-progress narrative that legitimizes them.

I enjoyed the book greatly and his writing is beyond gorgeous, but I'm not entirely persuaded. I think, in sections, he is on to something: Part 1, dealing with literary fiction, which he suggests as having excluded the improbable as a valid subject for exploration and therefore is poorly equipped for dealing with an era in which the improbable has become a daily occurrence, was compelling. I couldn't help but think of counter-examples while I was writing ([a:David Mitchell|6538289|David Mitchell|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1409248688p2/6538289.jpg], [b:Fifteen Dogs|23129923|Fifteen Dogs|André Alexis|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1447727528s/23129923.jpg|42677741], [b:The Humans|16130537|The Humans|Matt Haig|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1353739654s/16130537.jpg|21955852], [b:Not Dark Yet|24796166|Not Dark Yet|Berit Ellingsen|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1429097911s/24796166.jpg|44432239], etc.) so I don't know if I think it's as universal as he states, but I do think there's truth to the claim that literary fiction deals so closely with daily minutiae and interior states that something like a hundred-year-storm or drought would be difficult to turn into a literary work.

But then Part 3, in which he deals with politics, is not as compelling. His analysis of global politics and inequities I think is quite accurate, but his inability to see activism on behalf of identities as being grounded in collectives rather than the individual person was frankly strange (there's a lot of women, Ghosh).

[b:Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life|10300309|Living in Denial Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life|Kari Marie Norgaard|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1367782919s/10300309.jpg|15202275] and [b:Don't Even Think About It: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Ignore Climate Change|18594475|Don't Even Think About It Why Our Brains Are Wired to Ignore Climate Change|George Marshall|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1405300995s/18594475.jpg|26340874] were both better, more scientific, and more quantitative explorations of personal and societal (rather than economic) climate denialism, and made more compelling overall arguments. That said, Ghosh's critiques of western/american exceptionalism and the arguments that give their empires legitimacy was fantastic and he made a lot of excellent points. Maybe someone else can collect the data in support of his arguments. ( )
  andrea_mcd | Mar 10, 2020 |
Showing 1-5 of 8 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

Belongs to Series

Belongs to Publisher Series

You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
FOR MUKUL KESAVAN
In memory of the 1978 tornado
First words
Who can forget those moments when something that seems inanimate turns out to be vitally, even dangerously alive?
Quotations
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

"Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability--at the level of literature, history, and politics--to grasp the scale and violence of climate change. The extreme nature of today's climate events, Ghosh asserts, makes them peculiarly resistant to contemporary modes of thinking and imagining. This is particularly true of serious literary fiction: hundred-year storms and freakish tornadoes simply feel too improbable for the novel; they are automatically consigned to other genres. In the writing of history, too, the climate crisis has sometimes led to gross simplifications; Ghosh shows that the history of the carbon economy is a tangled global story with many contradictory and counterintuitive elements. Ghosh ends by suggesting that politics, much like literature, has become a matter of personal moral reckoning rather than an arena of collective action. But to limit fiction and politics to individual moral adventure comes at a great cost. The climate crisis asks us to imagine other forms of human existence--a task to which fiction, Ghosh argues, is the best suited of all cultural forms. His book serves as a great writer's summons to confront the most urgent task of our time."--Jacket.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.02)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3 4
3.5 5
4 38
4.5 3
5 9

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 203,252,883 books! | Top bar: Always visible