On This Page
Description
The first volume of John Galsworthy's gripping family drama Soames Forsyte's great desire to own things even extends to his captivating wife, Irene. Jealous of her friendships with others, he concocts a plan to move her away to the countryside, where he might come to own her completely. Resisting his bitter intentions, she falls for architect Philip Bossiney, who is unfortunately engaged to her best friend (and Soames' cousin), June Forsyte.Tags
Recommendations
Member Recommendations
Member Reviews
Summary: The Forsytes are a prime example of upper-middle class London in the late Victorian era. Descended from a successful working man, the ten siblings that make up the elder generation of Forsytes live in the lap of luxury, yet are constantly conscious of their position and their possessions. The first book in the Forsyte Saga primarily revolves around Soames Forsyte, one of the younger generation. Soames is well-to-do, and has possesses everything he could possibly want - except the affections of his wife, the beautiful but reserved Irene. Soames intends to move to the country, as a means of kindling some intimacy in their marriage, and he hires the young and struggling architect Phillip Bosinney, the fiancée of his niece, to show more design and build him a spectacular house at his property at Robin Hill. However, the heart of another is the one thing that can never be truly possessed, and Soames only slowly begins to realize that all of his wealth and status is not enough to buy him a loving marriage.
Review: My first introduction to the Forsyte Saga was through the DVDs of the recent miniseries, due to my Netflix's strange tendency to accumulate British costume dramas. As a result, I was already familiar with the characters (and thank goodness, too, because there are a crowded city block's worth of them) and I knew all of the main plot points, since it turns out the miniseries followed at least the first book extremely closely. Therefore, I was able to follow along with the story relatively easily, and pay more attention to the flow of the prose and the tone of the language.
And, it turns out, for all of my usual whining about how hard it is for me to deal with the language of the classics, that I really enjoyed Galsworthy's writing. I was pleasantly surprised by was Galsworthy's ability at evoking a scene. He's particularly good at describing the feeling of a night, or of a spring morning, or of a foggy London street, in language that is clear and gorgeously evocative, albeit occasionally a little purple. He doesn't focus on the "furniture" of a situation, and often doesn't provide a lot of scenic details, but is so good at evoking the tone of a scene that the details fill in themselves.
While I can't separate out how much of the characterizations were due to Galsworthy and how much were due to having watched the movies first, the characters really came alive for me. I'm actually going to say that it's mostly Galsworthy - Irene is more of an on-screen character in the movie, while in the book she's (intentionally) left as somewhat of a cipher, only ever seen through the eyes of the men around her. While reading, I found that she remained pretty mysterious, without the movie-version of her bleeding into my perception too much, so I'll give Galsworthy the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the other Forsytes as well. Certainly, the older Forsytes were a lot more at the fore in the book, with their own POV sections, and I find that I now understand James and Old Jolyon much better than I did after just watching the DVDs. It's one of those interesting books in which almost no character is entirely likable (maybe Young Jolyon?) or entirely blameless, and you're never entirely sure who to be angry at and who to pity - much like real life, in that way. And for all that it's a saga, it's not melodrama - it's a real-seeming (if somewhat extraordinary) family, full of real people, dealing with real problems and recognizable emotions. 4 out of 5 stars.
Recommendation: If you like your novels to come with extensive and complicated family trees, have I got a book for you! It's not for everyone, for sure, but if the phrase "Victorian family saga" piques your interest, then I found the first book of The Forsyte Saga to be surprisingly accessible. show less
Review: My first introduction to the Forsyte Saga was through the DVDs of the recent miniseries, due to my Netflix's strange tendency to accumulate British costume dramas. As a result, I was already familiar with the characters (and thank goodness, too, because there are a crowded city block's worth of them) and I knew all of the main plot points, since it turns out the miniseries followed at least the first book extremely closely. Therefore, I was able to follow along with the story relatively easily, and pay more attention to the flow of the prose and the tone of the language.
And, it turns out, for all of my usual whining about how hard it is for me to deal with the language of the classics, that I really enjoyed Galsworthy's writing. I was pleasantly surprised by was Galsworthy's ability at evoking a scene. He's particularly good at describing the feeling of a night, or of a spring morning, or of a foggy London street, in language that is clear and gorgeously evocative, albeit occasionally a little purple. He doesn't focus on the "furniture" of a situation, and often doesn't provide a lot of scenic details, but is so good at evoking the tone of a scene that the details fill in themselves.
While I can't separate out how much of the characterizations were due to Galsworthy and how much were due to having watched the movies first, the characters really came alive for me. I'm actually going to say that it's mostly Galsworthy - Irene is more of an on-screen character in the movie, while in the book she's (intentionally) left as somewhat of a cipher, only ever seen through the eyes of the men around her. While reading, I found that she remained pretty mysterious, without the movie-version of her bleeding into my perception too much, so I'll give Galsworthy the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the other Forsytes as well. Certainly, the older Forsytes were a lot more at the fore in the book, with their own POV sections, and I find that I now understand James and Old Jolyon much better than I did after just watching the DVDs. It's one of those interesting books in which almost no character is entirely likable (maybe Young Jolyon?) or entirely blameless, and you're never entirely sure who to be angry at and who to pity - much like real life, in that way. And for all that it's a saga, it's not melodrama - it's a real-seeming (if somewhat extraordinary) family, full of real people, dealing with real problems and recognizable emotions. 4 out of 5 stars.
Recommendation: If you like your novels to come with extensive and complicated family trees, have I got a book for you! It's not for everyone, for sure, but if the phrase "Victorian family saga" piques your interest, then I found the first book of The Forsyte Saga to be surprisingly accessible. show less
I really enjoyed this first installment in the family Forstye's history. It is set over quite a short period of time, and the action all proceeds quite slowly. This means that we get to know the various characters. Old Jolyon is a delight. There is (fortunately) a family tree provided, such that you can get the various characters straight. There are 3 generations who feature in this book, Old Jolyon and his siblings, their children and grandchildren. Old Jolyon has made a number of choices in respect of his treatment of his family, and in this book, those begin to change, with him softening his stance towards his son.
The marriage of Soames and Irene is clearly unhappy, but I can't help feeling that each party is unpleasant as the show more other. Irene clearly doesn't love Soames, but agreed to marry him and is now looking for a way out. She takes a lover, who happens to be engaged to Soames' relative, June. Soames is simply incapable of understanding his wife, and so they are both unhappy. And, based on how this concludes, they'll carry on making each other unhappy through a mixture of pride and stubbornness that each possess. I can't say I found either to be terribly likeable.
Of the other members of the family, there are the spinster sisters, the bachelor brother, the reclusive brother, the assortment of cousins. Some of them play a minor role in the story, and there are some lively characters in the mix there. It's set at an interesting time, in that the younger set are beginning to change the status quo that Jolyon and his siblings seem to cling to.
I really enjoyed this, and will move onto the interlude and books 2 of the saga, In Chancery, in due course. show less
The marriage of Soames and Irene is clearly unhappy, but I can't help feeling that each party is unpleasant as the show more other. Irene clearly doesn't love Soames, but agreed to marry him and is now looking for a way out. She takes a lover, who happens to be engaged to Soames' relative, June. Soames is simply incapable of understanding his wife, and so they are both unhappy. And, based on how this concludes, they'll carry on making each other unhappy through a mixture of pride and stubbornness that each possess. I can't say I found either to be terribly likeable.
Of the other members of the family, there are the spinster sisters, the bachelor brother, the reclusive brother, the assortment of cousins. Some of them play a minor role in the story, and there are some lively characters in the mix there. It's set at an interesting time, in that the younger set are beginning to change the status quo that Jolyon and his siblings seem to cling to.
I really enjoyed this, and will move onto the interlude and books 2 of the saga, In Chancery, in due course. show less
I've been meaning to read The Forsyte Saga for years, having enjoyed both TV dramatizations (1967 and 2002). And even though I know the story, I very much enjoyed this first book in the saga. Galsworthy gives us a lush, detailed view of late Victorian England's upper middle class and their mania for property and respectability. Like every family, the Forsytes have their secrets and black sheep, and that makes them all the more intriguing. The focus here is the ramrod-spined solicitor Soames and his unhappy wife, Irene. Soames had courted Irene more for her beauty than for love, treating her like one of his exquisite objéts d'art. So determined was he to have her that he promised to let her go if she wanted her freedom. And here lies show more the crux of the story: Irene is dreadfully unhappy, yet Soames refuses to let her go.
Galsworthy has created a cast of one-of-a-kind characters (or if they now seem like sterotypes, they were one-of-a-kind when first created). There are the senior Forsytes, Old Jolyon, James, Roger, and the aunts; the "black sheep," Young Jolyon, who married beneath him and was cut off by his father; Winifred, married to the alcoholic bounder Monty D'Arty; June, Young Jolyon's philanthropic daughter from a first marriage, and her dashing architect fiancé, Philip Bossiney, secretly dubbed by the family "The Buccaneer"; and many, many more.
There's a reason why Galsworthy's novels were so popular--and why not one but two dramatizations have been made. Quite simply, [The Forsyte Saga] is a jolly good story. I'm looking forward to moving on to the next six books in the saga. show less
Galsworthy has created a cast of one-of-a-kind characters (or if they now seem like sterotypes, they were one-of-a-kind when first created). There are the senior Forsytes, Old Jolyon, James, Roger, and the aunts; the "black sheep," Young Jolyon, who married beneath him and was cut off by his father; Winifred, married to the alcoholic bounder Monty D'Arty; June, Young Jolyon's philanthropic daughter from a first marriage, and her dashing architect fiancé, Philip Bossiney, secretly dubbed by the family "The Buccaneer"; and many, many more.
There's a reason why Galsworthy's novels were so popular--and why not one but two dramatizations have been made. Quite simply, [The Forsyte Saga] is a jolly good story. I'm looking forward to moving on to the next six books in the saga. show less
Soames Forsyte is the Man of Property, and the property he owns is both his house at Robin Hill and his wife. Treating his wife (Irene) as property leads to misery for both. Bossiney, the architect of the new home, becomes the lover of Irene. Soames reasserts his marital rights by raping Irene. Bossiney commits suicide; Irene leaves Soames. What's interesting is that at various points one starts to have sympathy for Soames only to then have him reveal his nature again. Also, I was quite taken with Galsworthy's ability to describe nature. Memorable passages.
I've finished the first book in the first trilogy of the Forsyte Chronicles, as well as the first interlude, Indian Summer of a Forsyte. The Man of Property was written in (1906) and is the story of a family fairly new to money. In this novel the Forsyte family members are introduced, and Soames Forsyte is the man of property of the title. He values his possessions above all else, and those possessions include his beautiful wife Irene. There is no happy ending here, but I really enjoyed this first installment, with its cutting satire of late Victorian middle class values. The interlude, written in 1918, focuses on Soames uncle, Old Jolyon Forsyte, and Irene. I must admit I loved this old man.
It's been many, many years since the last time I read the nine-volume saga or watched the 1967 TV series, but the characters came back easily thanks to Galsworthy's defining characterizations. Written in 1906, while Victorian values were still of consequence, Galsworthy portrays a family trying to maintain those principles yet beset by events that might shatter their carefully constructed citadel. I enjoyed the re-read tremendously, just as much as the original reading.
I gave 4 stars to this book a few days ago thinking that it would average a poor beginning (2 or 3 stars) with a superb ending (5 stars). But when I sat down to finally write a review, I realized my mistake: I actually listened to 2 distinct books in the Forsyte series: The Man of Property and The Indian Summer of a Forsyte which I thought was the epilogue, but is a sequel. So, a downgrade is in order here. (On a positive note, Audiable sold me two books in one, and I am feeling quite happy about it).
I should mention that part of my difficulty with this book was my dislike of the narrator – David Case. At times while listening I wondered if every character was as dislikable as Case makes them sound. But it would be unfair, I think, show more to blame all on Mr. Case. If I was to note anything about this book, is the absence of a character I fully sympathize. This is probably John Galsworthy’s geniuses at play, This is a book of social commentary, and in a very subtle way – and maybe not so subtle way – Galsworthy opens the door for us to enter the company of the British new rich at the end of the Victorian Era, and what we see there is a family blinded by its sense of self-importance and narcissism. One character – young Jolyon – is painted in better colours (maybe I liked him after all), but even the lovers, Irene and Boursine, are tainted by arrogance and disloyalty.
I don’t regret to read it, but if I was to recommend it, it would be as a prologue to the sequel: [b:Indian Summer of a Forsyte|87715|Indian Summer of a Forsyte|John Galsworthy|https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/books/1171110438s/87715.jpg|84677]. In it we meet old Jolyan and Irene in a more detailed and profound way, as if Galsworthy having giving the full background of this very rich man was now more interested in him as a person, a dying man at that. But I will leave that for the review on that book. show less
I should mention that part of my difficulty with this book was my dislike of the narrator – David Case. At times while listening I wondered if every character was as dislikable as Case makes them sound. But it would be unfair, I think, show more to blame all on Mr. Case. If I was to note anything about this book, is the absence of a character I fully sympathize. This is probably John Galsworthy’s geniuses at play, This is a book of social commentary, and in a very subtle way – and maybe not so subtle way – Galsworthy opens the door for us to enter the company of the British new rich at the end of the Victorian Era, and what we see there is a family blinded by its sense of self-importance and narcissism. One character – young Jolyon – is painted in better colours (maybe I liked him after all), but even the lovers, Irene and Boursine, are tainted by arrogance and disloyalty.
I don’t regret to read it, but if I was to recommend it, it would be as a prologue to the sequel: [b:Indian Summer of a Forsyte|87715|Indian Summer of a Forsyte|John Galsworthy|https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/books/1171110438s/87715.jpg|84677]. In it we meet old Jolyan and Irene in a more detailed and profound way, as if Galsworthy having giving the full background of this very rich man was now more interested in him as a person, a dying man at that. But I will leave that for the review on that book. show less
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
The Guardian's 1000 Novels Everyone Must Read
1,005 works; 546 members
Read the book and saw the movie
1,170 works; 195 members
1900s (Decade, not century)
73 works; 17 members
Best Family Stories
241 works; 22 members
Best family sagas
244 works; 33 members
Readable Classics
110 works; 15 members
Out of Copyright
244 works; 14 members
One Book, Many Authors
441 works; 40 members
Novels featuring siblings
133 works; 8 members
Books Read in 2016
4,666 works; 197 members
My TBR
371 works; 3 members
Recommended Reading : 600 Classics Reviewed, Editors of Salem Press, 2015
634 works; 6 members
Classics Book Club 2025
11 works; 1 member
Author Information

338+ Works 11,741 Members
At age 28, after a gentlemanly education at Harrow and Oxford, and a training at law, Galsworthy settled into simultaneous careers as a novelist and a playwright. The Silver Box, Galsworthy's first successful drama, was staged in 1906, the year he published the first volume of what was to become The Forsyte Saga. His one-word titles - Justice show more (1910), Strife (1909), Loyalties (1922)---suggest the nature of Galsworthy's artistic ambition: to generalize a social indictment, keeping faith with the objective methods of naturalism. In each, Galsworthy favors an austere irony and unresolvable situations, and balanced moral positions are displayed in the cabinetwork of "well-made" playwrighting. Reputed to have led to reforms in its time, his realism today seems contrived to produce aesthetic distance and a sense of resignation that is precisely what contemporary political dramatists strain hardest to avoid. Not surprisingly, critics have come away from revivals with the sense that (especially in his spare language) Galsworthy anticipates Harold Pinter rather than more socially engaged playwrights. Galsworthy wrote novels and plays alternately throughout his life. His masterwork, The Forsyte Saga, begun in 1906 and finished in 1928, and consisting of six separate novels and two linking interludes, is the most famous example of the sequence novel in English literature. It is a study of the property sense, the possessive spirit, in different individuals and generations of English middle-class society. He also completed a second trilogy dealing with the Forsyte family, called A Modern Comedy (1928). His last trilogy, a study of the Charwell family, is called End of the Chapter (1933). Galsworthy's later years brought him many honors, including the presidency of P.E.N. and honorary degrees from Oxford, Cambridge, and several other universities. After World War I, he was offered a knighthood, which he refused. He did, however, accept the Order of Merit in 1929, and in 1932 he was awarded the Nobel Prize. He was, however, too ill to attend the Nobel ceremony and died within two months of receiving the award. Although his posthumous reputation had waned, the centenary of his death, in 1967, brought a re-creation of The Forsyte Saga on British and American television in serial form. Interest in him skyrocketed, and the Forsyte novels again became bestsellers. With new popularity came fresh critical analysis. Pamela Hansford Johnson called The Forsyte Saga "a work of profound social insight and patchy psychological insight" (N.Y. Times). His critical writings include The Inn of Tranquility: Studies and Essays (1911) and Author and Critic. (Bowker Author Biography) show less
Some Editions
Awards and Honors
Series
Belongs to Publisher Series
Lanterne (L 82)
Zwarte Beertjes (501/502)
Work Relationships
Is contained in
Is abridged in
Common Knowledge
- Canonical title
- The Man of Property
- Original title
- The Man of Property
- Original publication date
- 1906
- People/Characters*
- June Forsyte; Philip Baynes Bosinney; Aunt Ann Forsyte; Irene Heron Forsyte; Soames Forsyte; James Forsyte (show all 26); Swithin Forsyte; Nicholas "Nick" Forsyte; Old Jolyon Forsyte; Roger Forsyte; Timothy Forsyte; Young Jolyon Forsyte; Julia "Juley" Forsyte Small; Jolly Forsyte; Holly Forsyte; Hélène Hilmer Forsyte; Aunt Hester Forsyte; George Forsyte; Euphemia Forsyte; Francis "Francie" Forsyte; Moses Montague Dartie; Winifred Forsyte Dartie; Emily Golding Forsyte; Louisa Baynes; Mrs MacAnder; Walter Bentham
- Important places
- London, England, UK
- Related movies
- That Forsyte Woman (1949 | IMDb); The Forsyte Saga (1967 | IMDb); The Forsyte Saga (2002 | IMDb)
- Epigraph
- You will answer / The Slaves are ours - Merchant of Venice
- Dedication
- To Edward Garnett
- First words
- Those privileged to be present at a family festival of the Forsytes have seen that charming and instructive sight - an upper middle-class family full of plumage.
- Quotations
- He had stopped to look in a picture shop, for Soames was an “amateur” of pictures, and had a little room in no. 62 Montpelier Square, full of canvases, stacked against the wall, which he had no room to hang.... he would e... (show all)nter this room on Sunday afternoons, to spend hours turning the pictures to the light, examining the marks on their backs, and occasionally making notes.
The inner decoration [of Soames’s house] favoured the First Empire and William Morris.... there were countless nooks resembling birds’ nests, and little things made of silver were deposited like eggs. - Last words*
- (Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)And in young Jolyon's face he slammed the door.
*Some information comes from Common Knowledge in other languages. Click "Edit" for more information.
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 1,147
- Popularity
- 21,815
- Reviews
- 22
- Rating
- (3.88)
- Languages
- 17 — Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, Norwegian (Bokmål), Norwegian, Polish, Romanian, Spanish, Swedish
- Media
- Paper, Audiobook, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 101
- ASINs
- 94


































































