Patton [1970 film]

by Franklin J. Schaffner (Director)

On This Page

Description

A dramatization of the experiences of General George S. Patton during World War II.

Tags

Recommendations

Member Reviews

7 reviews
Owned optical disc for years. Watch at least annually, Multiple Academy Awards. Scott declined the best Actor award
½
Another of my favorites. I have lots of military general biographies so I consider this movie a capstone to my interests.
The World War II phase of the career of the controversial American general, George S. Patton. (IMDb)
The personal story of the World War 2 career of General Patton. Inaccurate history. Scott's Patton was way too heavy-handed. Patton was nothing if not lighthearted and depended upon his staff far more than displayed in the film. Karl Malden needed more than his gimmick of chewing on a piece of straw for his Bradley portrayal - he does NOT resemble Omar Bradley. A total miscast, the result of Hollywood's continual illusion that any good actor can portray any personality faithfully. Of course, Hollywood script writers seldom are very familiar with the historical figures they create on film, or what they did. The major problem with this film's script was its absurd portrayal of Patton as a "tank expert." He certainly was not that. Patton show more completely misunderstood the purpose of armor in WWII. He rejected the M26 Pershing tank in favor of the horrible Sherman they had used up until the Tidworth Downs conference in England prior to Normandy. His brainless decision (based on obsolete Army theories of armored warfare) was vehemently opposed by every armor commander who had had experience with the Shermans in Sicily and North Africa. Everyone except Patton was well aware of the severe deficiencies of the Sherman tank, but Patton's rank and obstinateness prevailed. That I rank as the most disastrous decision made by any US commander in WWII - it lengthened the war and killed many thousands of those unfortunate enough to be selected to be a member of a Sherman tank crew. After the invasion, when it became readily apparent just how inferior the Sherman was, a growing scandal was hushed up by the governments of both Britain and the US. Despite the fact that Patton's rejection of the vastly superior Pershing was easily the most significant and far reaching decision he ever made, the film doesn't even mention the fact. This totally destroys the credibility of this film. Typical Hollywood history - things are portrayed the way some scriptwriter wishes they had happened. Buy hey, that's Hollywood. show less
½
Jan 5, 2026English (UK)
Un ritratto a tutto tondo di George Patton, il più famoso generale di truppe corazzate che combatté per gli americani durante la seconda guerra mondiale. Il personaggio è descritto come un comandante abile, ma esibizionista, autoritario e in perenne rivalità con l'inglese Montgomery.
Alla sconfitta tunisina, le forze armate americane sotto la guida del Generale Patton, in costante conflitto con i propri superiori, fanno seguire la trionfale liberazione dell'Europa dal Nazismo. (fonte: Wikipedia)

Members

Recently Added By

Published Reviews

ThingScore 25
Visually the movie is in a style that might be described as imperial. It does not really look quite like any other movie, and that in itself is an achievement (though not necessarily an aesthetic one)... The images, typically, are incredibly long, wide shots, taking in vast areas, with the human figured dwarfed by the terrain, and with more compositional use of sky than I’ve even before seen show more in a movie... I’m sure it will be said that the picture is “true” to Patton and to history, but I think it strings us along and holds out on us. If we don’t just want to have our prejudices greased, we’ll find it confusing and unsatisfying, because we aren’t given enough information to evaluate Patton’s actions...

The public-relations designation of this film is Patton: A Salute to a Rebel. Whom does Twentieth Century-Fox think it’s kidding? What was Patton a rebel against except humanitarianism?... One can scarcely blame the movie for the ads, but the movie is also busy trying to outsmart the public, presenting an arch-authoritarian as a rebel, the way one might present Spiro Agnew as a rebel against effete snobs.
show less
Pauline Kael, New Yorker
added by SnootyBaronet

Author Information

Picture of author.
Director
42+ Works 1,754 Members

All Editions

Bradley, Omar B. (Original Book)
Coppola, Francis Ford (Screenwriter)
Farago, Ladislas (Original Book)
Goldsmith, Jerry (Composer)
Koenekamp, Fred J. (Cinematographer)
Malden, Karl (Actor)
McCarthy, Frank (Producer)
North, Edmund H. (Screenwriter)

Awards and Honors

Work Relationships

Common Knowledge

Classifications

DDC/MDS
791.4372Arts & recreationRecreation, sports, and performing artsMovies, TV, VideoMotion pictures, radio, television, podcastingMotion picturesFilms; screenplaysSingle films
LCC
PN1997Language and LiteratureLiterature (General)Literature (General)DramaMotion picturesPlays, scenarios, etc.

Statistics

Members
452
Popularity
67,472
Reviews
7
Rating
(3.86)
Languages
English, Finnish, Spanish
ISBNs
11
UPCs
11
ASINs
28