The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror

I really enjoyed this book. I see that it has gotten mixed reviews. I was looking for something to give me some background and reasoning behind the fundamentalist Islamic terrorists we see today, and this book did a good job. I have read other books on the subject as well, and Lewis gives a fair background without going into extraordinary detail. I did not feel that he was making excuses for the terrorists, but rather saying, "This is the history that they are idolizing- right or wrong." What I found most interesting is the belief that the Muslims were superior during the middle ages to the point that they refused to learn from other civilizations, which became their downfall.

The book does not require any previous study of Islam and the style is accessible to any reader.
Its ability to convey the difference in perception of the modernity by Muslim and non-Muslim societies, the ability to explain the depth of the religion-based differences of such perception is probably the most significant virtue of this book.
Lewis is reasonably neutral in his narrative and provides internal logic and historical background that explains fundamentalist Islam. He also provides some valid reasons why Islamic fundamentalists manipulate and distort the scripture.
Unfortunately, written in 2003 it does not account for recent changes, but it does confront Bin Laden's attacks on Western morals.

An excellent summary of the curent state of the Islamic mindset. What they are thinking, and what lead to that. Useful cultural interpretation of the environment out of which today's terrorists originate.

Finally, a couple of decades late, I got around to reading this history giving context post-9/11 to Bush and Osama bin Laden's disagreements and how Iraq figures in. The purpose is to help the reader understand the the published complaints Bin Laden made against America. This basically suggests that the Islamic world has a religiously motivated world view that is more intertwined with religion and foreign policy that we in the West would consider and also there is a longer memory - going back centuries. The history includes the post-WWII Middle East mandates leading to artificial states in those problems, Arab world views on Israel, and the hatred "fundamentalist" (not the best word) Islamists would have for Arab world establishment show more from Sadat (assassinated for impiety) to the Saud family, etc. show less

In this slim volume Lewis artfully explains the complexity of Islam in brief but understandable terms. The work would be a useful introduction for anyone seeking to learn reliably and usefully how to explain the Islamic holy war against the West. It is superseded by many more comprehensive works but Lewis does not claim to go beyond the introductory in this short work. Lewis is on less sure ground, and more controversial on his political and diplomatic points but I do not see him straying from an accurate and factual account of Islam regardless of what his critics argue.

The subject sounded promising, but the actual result was a boring, detailed account. The historical view was wound up like a boring college history lesson; unfamiliar names and places with zero motivation to listen. Perhaps better to read than to listen to. The author reads like a prepared speech and speaks very fast with a British accent devoid of the letter "R". Not my kind of book. DNF.

'The Crisis of Islam' does an excellent job of reviewing the history; however, the author takes to the sideline in the novel always being careful not to be too critical of either the West or Islam.