Faith of the Fallen

Goodkind is at his best when providing social commentary that feels relevant as well as interesting, wrapping it around a fascinating story that stands out from the rest of the series as the uncontested best of the bunch. Many of the clichés used in his earlier novels are absent, Kahlan escapes the obnoxiously overused role of the damsel in distress for the most part and this is probably as enjoyable as she's ever been and probably ever will be. It introduces us to what is probably the deepest and most tragic character of the franchise and gives us a much needed new perspective of the antagonists of the last three books, and thankfully the underworld and the keeper are barely even mentioned. The primary message of the Sword of Truth show more series seems to culminate in its entirely in the climax of this book, it's probably the best thing Goodkind has ever written and has yet to be topped. show less

Having lost any faith in his people, Richard abandons his command of the army and retires into the mountains to slowly nurse Kahlan back to health. The Order is too large to destroy with a direct attack, Richard can see that it is useless to fight them.

But just as Kahlan is recovering from her injuries, Nicci, a notorious Sister of the Dark and Slave Queen of Emperor Jagang, arrives at their remote cottage. Before anyone can attack her, Nicci casts an obscure spell at Kahlan that links their lives. Richard must come away with Nicci or Kahlan will be killed. Nicci's motives are never fully explained, but she somehow hopes to learn the secret to Richard's inner motivation. Her plan for this involves taking Richard into the heart of the show more Old World.

This book is really REALLY repetitive. This is now the third time that a woman of astonishing power has arrived onto the scene to take Richard as a personal slave. It's getting pretty stale at this point. Also, nothing makes sense, especially not the character of Nicci.

Nicci is supposed to be this husk of a person, someone who has bought into the Order so far that she believes nothing that happens to her matters. She's raped and beaten constantly and doesn't care because she feels and fears nothing. Then ten minutes later she's whining because she's had to stand in the rain for a few hours. One minute she plans to enslave Richard so that she can learn some mystic truth and then murder him. The next minute she's baking him bread and weeping because he doesn't like her soup. The next minute she's in a frenzy of fear because he's being tortured by the government. The next minute she is glad he's being tortured and hopes he dies. It's all nonsense. She's a sister of the Dark but she's also... SOMEHOW devoted to the Creator? She thinks magic is evil and never really applied herself to learn any of it, but she's also brimming full of power and everyone is afraid of her. Geeez.... which is it? I sincerely don't care, but at least pick one at random for consistency.

The Old World also makes no sense as a kingdom. At home everyone is starving because the society is so mired in bureaucracy that crop yields rot before they can make it to market. And yet, this kingdom is supposedly supporting an army of MILLIONS as they invade whole other countries. What do the supply lines look like? The people are too lazy to work an easy job but when they join the army they somehow become super-naturally disciplined killing machines?? You literally cannot have it both ways. The Old World is some impossible combination of North Korea and the Roman Empire.

Also, Richard goes the whole book without doing any magic. Seriously? I'm not reading fantasy epics for their rapier political commentary, that's for sure. Throw us a bone here! I guess we're supposed to believe that his carving skills are magical. And geez they would have to be. He destroyed an entire ingrained, centuries-long philosophy with a statue. Yup.

Nevermind the glaringly obvious fact that this entire book is basically a ham-fisted re-telling of Atlas Shrugged set in a quasi-fantasy universe. This book just sticks out like a sore thumb in the series. I don't get how it fits or why he wrote it like this. Just. No. show less

This series was introduced to me by a then girlfriend (my first serious one). My review applies to all of his books that I've read.

His stories are engaging enough, so that's not an issue. They are extremely pornographic in their depictions of sex, rape, torture, and war...if that's your thing. It's just the fantasy element has been attached. They're also very masturbatory (or "autoerotic", if you prefer) when it comes to all things Ayn Rand ("objectivism"). One book in particular (I forget which one) was decidedly anti-democracy in its ethos. There was also the author's justifications for the slaughter of innocent people (because, in his eyes, they're not innocent, even if they're non-combatants). I enjoyed the books well enough as a show more high schooler, though I've since grown up (and grown beyond them, though I still enjoy the fantasy genre). show less

This review refers to the SOT series through book 9.

Terry Goodkind’s first book Wizard’s First Rule was great! Except for the actual First Rule ("People are Stupid"), which was...stupid. The story had so many unique and fascinating characters (especially the secondary ones). I was in love with Richard; I wanted to be a Mord-Sith. The next couple of books of The Sword of Truth were pretty good, too.

Then...I don’t know what happened...it just TOTALLY lost it. The writing style became incredibly annoying and Richard was getting WAY too preachy (constant Ayn Rand-ish humanistic ranting). But, I kept going because I was really invested by this time. And each time I bought one of his $25 hardback books, I found myself rolling my eyes at show more every passive sentence and starting to fall asleep during the sermons (when did Richard hire a speech writer??).

And the plot really got ssslllllloooowwww (just look at the book covers for Chainfire and Phantom — you can tell we're not going anywhere). But the weirdest thing is that I kept buying these 1 star books! I can’t explain my behavior, except to say that Terry Goodkind is (was) a master at plot and characterization (truly, his secondary characters are so well done). So I kept thinking that things would get better, but they did not. How did he pull off that excellent first booK?? I've learned from this experience that I can put down a book if it's not good. There's too much good literature to read.

According to Mr Goodkind, those of us who have bailed out are ignorant and uneducated. Wow. That is something I have never been called before. I should have realized right from the start ("Wizard's First Rule: People are stupid") what kind of fellow Terry Goodkind is. Here is a quote from a chat session conducted with Mr Goodkind (this used to be on his website, but has now been removed. It is well-documented on the internet, however.):

"Why would they continue to read books they claim are bad? Because they hate that my novels exists. Values arouse hatred in these people. Their goal is not to enjoy life, but to destroy that which is good — much like a school child who does not wish to study for a test and instead beats up a classmate who does well. These people hate what is good because it is good. Their lives are limited to loathing and indifference. It isn't that they want to read a good book, what they want is to make sure that you do not. Ignore them." —Terry Goodkind

I say Terry Goodkind is the one acting like a school child having a tantrum. I regret that he got so much of my money. I hope you won't give him any of yours. If you really want to try a Goodkind book, I would recommend that you go to the library and check out the first few, and then trust me that you don't need to read any further. I will not read the last book. I'm not even tempted. What an ass.
Read more Terry Goodkind book reviews at Fantasy Literature . show less

This was the second time that I'd read 'Faith of the Fallen,' and for the second time I have been completely blown away by Terry Goodkind's incredible skill. The new characters we meet in this (The sixth instalment of the Sword of Truth series) are so realistic and relatable. I found myself rooting for both sides at points; both The Order, and the people of the Midlands. It is shocking for me to have re-read something and to have it still be as enchanting and spectacular as the first time I glimpsed such work. The plot was well crafted and I found that in many ways, The Order represented a sort of corrupt religion, inspiring faith through threat and false promises alone (like some politicians as well I suppose.) I loved that we got to show more explore more of Sister Nicci's past within this stunning volume. The drama hardly ever lets up and keeps you wanting more, more, more. I would definitely recommend this to everyone I know. show less

Reviewers of Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth series seem to fall into three camps. There are those who claim he's a rotten writer and right from the beginning. Why they're reading and reviewing this far into the series I'll never understand. There are pleasures in a trainwreck at times, I know. That's why I read the entire Twilight "Saga"- four miserably written books that are mercifully not all that long. But up to six books of doorstopper length? Did they really read all these? Then there are the ones that just lap these up to the end, convinced Goodkind is the greatest, most profound writer of the human condition EVUH. (Goodkind himself given his interviews seems to be one of that number.)

I'm in the third camp. The one that loved show more this series at one point, then thought it jumped the shark. Some cite the previous book, Soul of the Fire as where the series declined. Most of those readers who found themselves ultimately disappointed with the series cite this book. I'm actually not one of them. (No, for me Pillars of Creation, the next book, is where things became tedious.)

I do get why people are annoyed by this book though. Goodkind makes no bones about being an Ayn Rand devotee on his website. Unsurprising to me when I found that out, since I thought I could detect libertarian themes in the previous books. Something I found more attractive rather than repellant. But this is the book where it becomes overt--for many a reader it seems, far too overt. Yes, at times you can hear the anvils clanging in this parable about the EVILS of socialism.

Although if I were to point to the book's most annoying characteristic, it was the way in this book Richard becomes an overweening Marty-Stu. Yes, he's the hero. The hero of the series. I didn't blink an eye at him being a master tracker. Or a natural leader and general. Or even the greatest magician of his time. But when after all that he becomes a sculptor who makes Michelangelo seem a slacker? That's when I thought, head, meet desk.

So I can see what the detractors are sniping at in this high fantasy Atlas Shrugged. Truly. Yet I still found this book enormously entertaining. And I liked Nicci and her character arc. She's not up in awesomeness with Cara or Ann in my opinion, but she isn't a Jennsen either. For which, much thanks. show less

I pursued this one simply to witness its blatant Objectivist slant, although Goodkind is as ham-handed with forcing his message into our brains as Ayn Rand was accused of. I find it incontrovertible that her philosophy suddenly begins to rule the series from this point forward, with little or no hint of it prior (e.g. "People are stupid" as a moral is not Objectivism.) My assumption is that he became sold on this philosophy between writing the fourth and fifth novels, and determined to redirect the path his series was taking, mid-course. Really, he should have started over anew.

Regarding the story, Goodkind is not successful at convincing me that a Fountainhead plot can have Atlas Shrugged impact, not even in fantasyland.