This is more of an essay, than a book, coming in at 23 pages. Basically, it describes the fallacies with various philosophical concepts, although it could do a better job of dear and explaining each concept and why those fallacies exist. At one point, the author referred to himself as Jesus. ( )

This is a short piece, more an essay than a book, at 27 pages.
The key point the author makes is that all traditional philosophies have shortcomings and paradoxes. His solution is to integrate the tenets of your favoured philosophy with its negative counterparts to produce a more sustainable and logical whole. This is a conclusion that the author has arrived at after much thought and makes some sense.
May I suggest that his argument would be more powerful if there were more detailed examples of integration in part 1 and if the author’s story in part 3 was written more around the integration theme.
Nevertheless, kudos to the author for sharing his thoughts. ( )