On This Page
Description
Both the computer and the woman were the products of an alien intelligence. Man had built them to the specifications from a signal received form the constellation Andromeda, and so their existence on Earth had begun. Determining their real purpose was not so readily apparent.Tags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
I’ll admit it: I picked this one up and put it down more than once. Andromeda Breakthrough trades the eerie stillness and philosophical ambiguity of its predecessor for something louder—more espionage, more power games, more men in suits making dangerous decisions. It felt, at times, like Hoyle had wandered onto the set of a different genre entirely.
And maybe he had.
But I kept coming back. Because if A for Andromeda taught me anything, it’s that Hoyle doesn’t play all his cards at once. The science and the ideas—they’re always there. You just have to read the table and bide your time.
Science, Subversion, and a Change of Tone
This sequel—also born from a BBC teleplay—picks up in the aftermath of A for Andromeda, relocating show more the story to the Middle East and shifting the focus from scientific discovery to the geopolitical exploitation of what remains: an engineered girl and the alien technology that made her.
Where A for Andromeda felt like an act of cautious decoding, this one plays more like a race for control. Governments and corporations vie to turn Andromeda’s capabilities into weapons, cures, or capital. Scientific curiosity is no longer the driver; now it’s power. I’ll be honest—I struggled with that. Hoyle is no Le Carré, and certainly no Clancy. The thriller elements stumble—cardboard characters, coarse geopolitics, and espionage that never quite clicks. And yet…
The Long Game
What pulled me through—what finally made the story click—was the last third of the book. That’s where Hoyle reasserts himself. The science re-emerges: environmental manipulation, climate as a lever of global power, and the return of a synthetic mind that might not be quite so docile.
That shift—from spy drama back to existential sci-fi—is where the book earns its place. The questions come flooding back: Is Andromeda a tool, or is she something more? Can powerful knowledge be used without corrupting the intentions of those who wield it? Can we ever separate scientific progress from the political hands that wield it?
A Proto-Thriller Before the Thrillers
Here’s the curious part: the teleplay for The Andromeda Breakthrough predates The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (1963) by a year. Hoyle didn’t just write early sci-fi—he may have stumbled into the spy thriller before it had a name. Granted, his version is clunky in places. But the bones are there: betrayal, disillusionment, secrets. As with A for Andromeda, I’m left wondering how many later writers quietly borrowed from this one without ever saying so.
Final Thoughts
In the end, this isn’t really a standalone novel—it’s the second half of a long (and strange) thought experiment. If A for Andromeda asked what happens when we follow a signal too far, Andromeda Breakthrough asks what happens when we try to own it. The alien mystery may be quieter here, but the warning still rings clear.
We build things we don’t understand. We hand them to people we shouldn’t trust. And if we’re not careful, we end up serving the machine we meant to command.
P.S.: The Mountaintop and the Machine
A brief postscript feels appropriate here. I don’t normally draw out key takeaways from fiction, but this one earns the exception.
The final chapter of Andromeda Breakthrough takes us to a literal and symbolic high point. Fleming and Andromeda—exhausted, hunted, and half-forgotten—stand on a mountain contemplating the stars. It’s an unlikely place for revelation, but that’s where Hoyle sets his closing argument.
This isn’t just narrative closure. It’s philosophy. Here, in four deliberate turns, Hoyle reframes the entire series:
1. From Noise to Clarity
They’re fugitives now—scientists turned saboteurs, fleeing not a machine, but the systems of power that sought to control it. The mountaintop is more than scenery. It’s isolation, distance, perspective. Hoyle’s choice of setting is deliberate: this is where interference fades and insight becomes possible.
2. Restraint over Ruin
Fleming doesn’t destroy the machine. He nearly does—but he stops. Not because he trusts it, but because he finally understands the real threat isn’t the knowledge. It’s the ambition of those who would misuse it. Saving the computer is not an act of rebellion, but restraint. He protects not a device, but a possibility. Hoyle likens it to sparking a new renaissance—not a technological leap, but a philosophical one.
3. A Future Embodied—and Withheld
By now, André has become something else. Neither fully human nor machine, she represents the potential synthesis: knowledge tempered by empathy. But she’s also dying. Hoyle seems to suggest we’re not ready for what she embodies. At least not yet. Fleming’s choice (to love the girl) is both hopeful and sad—a gesture toward a future he knows he may never see.
4. Stewardship, Not Surrender
Across both books, the warning is clear: knowledge without wisdom is dangerous—but fear of knowledge is worse. Hoyle isn’t advocating blind pursuit; he’s arguing for stewardship. Curiosity tempered by conscience. Fleming’s final act is a moral one. He refuses to let power dictate what survives. He gives the future a second chance.
Taken together, this final chapter is more than a conclusion—it’s a statement of principle. The Andromeda series isn’t really about alien signals or Cold War espionage. It’s about the ethics of invention. Our capacity to build is never in doubt. Our readiness to wield what we build—that’s the real question.
We build things we don’t understand. We hand them to people we shouldn’t trust. And if we’re not careful, we end up serving the machine we meant to command. show less
And maybe he had.
But I kept coming back. Because if A for Andromeda taught me anything, it’s that Hoyle doesn’t play all his cards at once. The science and the ideas—they’re always there. You just have to read the table and bide your time.
Science, Subversion, and a Change of Tone
This sequel—also born from a BBC teleplay—picks up in the aftermath of A for Andromeda, relocating show more the story to the Middle East and shifting the focus from scientific discovery to the geopolitical exploitation of what remains: an engineered girl and the alien technology that made her.
Where A for Andromeda felt like an act of cautious decoding, this one plays more like a race for control. Governments and corporations vie to turn Andromeda’s capabilities into weapons, cures, or capital. Scientific curiosity is no longer the driver; now it’s power. I’ll be honest—I struggled with that. Hoyle is no Le Carré, and certainly no Clancy. The thriller elements stumble—cardboard characters, coarse geopolitics, and espionage that never quite clicks. And yet…
The Long Game
What pulled me through—what finally made the story click—was the last third of the book. That’s where Hoyle reasserts himself. The science re-emerges: environmental manipulation, climate as a lever of global power, and the return of a synthetic mind that might not be quite so docile.
That shift—from spy drama back to existential sci-fi—is where the book earns its place. The questions come flooding back: Is Andromeda a tool, or is she something more? Can powerful knowledge be used without corrupting the intentions of those who wield it? Can we ever separate scientific progress from the political hands that wield it?
A Proto-Thriller Before the Thrillers
Here’s the curious part: the teleplay for The Andromeda Breakthrough predates The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (1963) by a year. Hoyle didn’t just write early sci-fi—he may have stumbled into the spy thriller before it had a name. Granted, his version is clunky in places. But the bones are there: betrayal, disillusionment, secrets. As with A for Andromeda, I’m left wondering how many later writers quietly borrowed from this one without ever saying so.
Final Thoughts
In the end, this isn’t really a standalone novel—it’s the second half of a long (and strange) thought experiment. If A for Andromeda asked what happens when we follow a signal too far, Andromeda Breakthrough asks what happens when we try to own it. The alien mystery may be quieter here, but the warning still rings clear.
We build things we don’t understand. We hand them to people we shouldn’t trust. And if we’re not careful, we end up serving the machine we meant to command.
P.S.: The Mountaintop and the Machine
A brief postscript feels appropriate here. I don’t normally draw out key takeaways from fiction, but this one earns the exception.
The final chapter of Andromeda Breakthrough takes us to a literal and symbolic high point. Fleming and Andromeda—exhausted, hunted, and half-forgotten—stand on a mountain contemplating the stars. It’s an unlikely place for revelation, but that’s where Hoyle sets his closing argument.
This isn’t just narrative closure. It’s philosophy. Here, in four deliberate turns, Hoyle reframes the entire series:
1. From Noise to Clarity
They’re fugitives now—scientists turned saboteurs, fleeing not a machine, but the systems of power that sought to control it. The mountaintop is more than scenery. It’s isolation, distance, perspective. Hoyle’s choice of setting is deliberate: this is where interference fades and insight becomes possible.
2. Restraint over Ruin
Fleming doesn’t destroy the machine. He nearly does—but he stops. Not because he trusts it, but because he finally understands the real threat isn’t the knowledge. It’s the ambition of those who would misuse it. Saving the computer is not an act of rebellion, but restraint. He protects not a device, but a possibility. Hoyle likens it to sparking a new renaissance—not a technological leap, but a philosophical one.
3. A Future Embodied—and Withheld
By now, André has become something else. Neither fully human nor machine, she represents the potential synthesis: knowledge tempered by empathy. But she’s also dying. Hoyle seems to suggest we’re not ready for what she embodies. At least not yet. Fleming’s choice (to love the girl) is both hopeful and sad—a gesture toward a future he knows he may never see.
4. Stewardship, Not Surrender
Across both books, the warning is clear: knowledge without wisdom is dangerous—but fear of knowledge is worse. Hoyle isn’t advocating blind pursuit; he’s arguing for stewardship. Curiosity tempered by conscience. Fleming’s final act is a moral one. He refuses to let power dictate what survives. He gives the future a second chance.
Taken together, this final chapter is more than a conclusion—it’s a statement of principle. The Andromeda series isn’t really about alien signals or Cold War espionage. It’s about the ethics of invention. Our capacity to build is never in doubt. Our readiness to wield what we build—that’s the real question.
We build things we don’t understand. We hand them to people we shouldn’t trust. And if we’re not careful, we end up serving the machine we meant to command. show less
Set on earth, this aged novel has a great similarity to Ian Fleming's and John Buchan's spy fiction stories. Not very scientific, but adventurous and easy to read. The scientists based in Scotland had built a computer using instructions from Andromeda, and created a humanoid. One of the scientists thought these could be a malicious intent by Andromeda to destroy earth's civilization so he destroyed the computer and ran away with the humanoid, ending up in Azaran...the seas became infected with a bacteria which caused oxygen in the atmosphere to be reduced...some political power-struggles and coup d'etat...
Andromeda Breakthrough continues on the story from A for Andromeda, we commence with the main characters believing the alien designed computer has been destroyed. However shortly thereafter John Fleming and Andromeda are kidnapped by the secretive Intel cooperative and made to work on their version of the alien designed computer which they constructed in secret in the fictitious middle eastern country of Azaran.
The story itself I felt lacked some of the pizzazz of A for Andromeda, certainly the absence of man vs mystery forces story line that formed such a central part of the former meant the amount of material the book had to work with was substantially less. Whilst such does re-emerge a little in the latter half of the book when it show more becomes apparent a biological contaminant has escaped from the initial testing ground I didn't find the narrative as compelling as the earlier battle of John vs computer we saw in the former.
Overall, it was a decent story, continued the Andromeda world a little more and did make for an enjoyable read even if not quite up to the standard set in the first book. Still worth reading if you enjoyed the first in my opinion. show less
The story itself I felt lacked some of the pizzazz of A for Andromeda, certainly the absence of man vs mystery forces story line that formed such a central part of the former meant the amount of material the book had to work with was substantially less. Whilst such does re-emerge a little in the latter half of the book when it show more becomes apparent a biological contaminant has escaped from the initial testing ground I didn't find the narrative as compelling as the earlier battle of John vs computer we saw in the former.
Overall, it was a decent story, continued the Andromeda world a little more and did make for an enjoyable read even if not quite up to the standard set in the first book. Still worth reading if you enjoyed the first in my opinion. show less
This is my third Fred Hoyle novel and the best. It is interesting SF with some international intrigue. This is the first Hoyle novel that kept me interested cover to cover. It's not 4 stars but worth a read.
Astronomer Fred Hoyle wrote a number of science fiction novels. In this one, a scientist is on the run with a girl who was created from a formula received from space. Behind them is a destroyed super computer, the greatest in the world, built with help from the mysterious, distant aliens. But someone else has another one which they plan on turning on. Quick reading tale, somewhat interesting.
Better than the first one in my opinion and wraps everything up to a decent conclusion.
England, Thorness, ca 1970
John Fleming var en af de førende videnskabsmænd, da englændere fik afkodet et signal, der blev sendt fra et sted nær Andromeda galaksen. De byggede en computer og en syntetisator til fremstilling af biologisk materiale og højdepunktet var en kunstig skabning i form af en ung kvinde kaldet Andre eller Andromeda. Fordi de frygtede at budskabet ikke var sendt for deres blå øjnes skyld, ødelagde Andromeda på Flemings råd både computer og de eksisterende kopier af budskabet. Derefter flygtede de til en lille ø, hvor Andromeda formodedes at være druknet.
Denne bog starter med at (Moriarty, nåeh nej) Andromeda ikke døde alligevel. Fleming redder hende og flygter videre med hende i en fæl storm. De show more kommer til en lille hytte, hvor megakoncernen Intel sender bevæbnede folk til for at sikre sig dem. Det kommer til skudkamp og da hytten ejes af en lidt anarkistisk eneboer, Preen, med en automatriffel, går Fleming og Andromeda af med sejren.
De kontakter politiet, men bliver kun taget i midlertidig arrest, indtil Flemings chefer dukker op og tager dem med- En kvindelig forsker, Dawnay, bliver lokket til den rige oliestat Azaran, hvor oberst Salim er meget tæt på præsidenten og har lavet aftaler med megakoncernen Intel. Intel har en trofast medarbejder i Kaufmann, som er tidligere kontormedarbejder i en kz-lejr og egentlig ikke kan lide direkte vold. Kaufmann har dog ikke noget imod at kidnappe Fleming og Andromeda til Azaran.
Her er Andromeda ved at dø, fordi hendes blod mangler en eller andet ingrediens. Hun hjælper dog med at få Salims kopi af computeren til at virke og Salim sætter et statskup i gang.
Intel har en kvindelig medarbejder med i spillet, Mademoisselle Gamboul, og hun får Salim slået ihjel efter at statskuppet er slået fejl. Derefter overtager hun selv magten ved at kontrollere den valgte, men svage præsident. Stort set samtidigt opdager man at en ny bakterieform er ved at spise alt kvælstof i atmosfæren, hvilket udløser store storme og fald i lufttrykket over havet. En prognose siger at menneskeheden højst har et år tilbage. Bakterien er en af Thorness computerens små tricks, fra inden den blev ødelagt af Fleming.
André hjælper med at få computeretn til at lave en modgift mod bakterien. Den bliver fremstillet af Madeleine Dawney og efter en indsats af Fleming, får de også lavet den manglende ingrediens til André's blod.
Gamboul bliver dræbt under en af stormene og Kaufmann forsøger at tage over, men det lykkes ikke. Fleming og Dawney redder verden ved at få bragt opskriften på bakteriemodgiften videre og kvælstoffet bobler tilbage i atmosfæren, så folk igen kan trække vejret ubesværet. Stormvejrene bliver også mere normale og alt ender godt igen. Intel bliver demonteret.
Fleming får André til at nulstille computeren, men først viser hun ham lige billeder af de væsener, der har sendt budskabet. Det er ubevægelige skikkelser på en klode under en blå sol.
Bogen er en fortsættelse af A for Andromeda (på dansk: Angrebet fra Andromeda eller Budskabet fra Andromeda). A for Andromeda var oprindeligt manuskript til en tv-serie. BBC har slettet båndene.
Bogen kan også læses som en ophobning af klicheer, britisk stiff upper lip, britisk politi, britisk militær, britiske videnskabsmænd i hvide kitler, kvinder der skal reddes, rige oliestater styret af brutale militærfolk, onde megakoncerner, løbske kunstige bakterier osv. show less
John Fleming var en af de førende videnskabsmænd, da englændere fik afkodet et signal, der blev sendt fra et sted nær Andromeda galaksen. De byggede en computer og en syntetisator til fremstilling af biologisk materiale og højdepunktet var en kunstig skabning i form af en ung kvinde kaldet Andre eller Andromeda. Fordi de frygtede at budskabet ikke var sendt for deres blå øjnes skyld, ødelagde Andromeda på Flemings råd både computer og de eksisterende kopier af budskabet. Derefter flygtede de til en lille ø, hvor Andromeda formodedes at være druknet.
Denne bog starter med at (Moriarty, nåeh nej) Andromeda ikke døde alligevel. Fleming redder hende og flygter videre med hende i en fæl storm. De show more kommer til en lille hytte, hvor megakoncernen Intel sender bevæbnede folk til for at sikre sig dem. Det kommer til skudkamp og da hytten ejes af en lidt anarkistisk eneboer, Preen, med en automatriffel, går Fleming og Andromeda af med sejren.
De kontakter politiet, men bliver kun taget i midlertidig arrest, indtil Flemings chefer dukker op og tager dem med- En kvindelig forsker, Dawnay, bliver lokket til den rige oliestat Azaran, hvor oberst Salim er meget tæt på præsidenten og har lavet aftaler med megakoncernen Intel. Intel har en trofast medarbejder i Kaufmann, som er tidligere kontormedarbejder i en kz-lejr og egentlig ikke kan lide direkte vold. Kaufmann har dog ikke noget imod at kidnappe Fleming og Andromeda til Azaran.
Her er Andromeda ved at dø, fordi hendes blod mangler en eller andet ingrediens. Hun hjælper dog med at få Salims kopi af computeren til at virke og Salim sætter et statskup i gang.
Intel har en kvindelig medarbejder med i spillet, Mademoisselle Gamboul, og hun får Salim slået ihjel efter at statskuppet er slået fejl. Derefter overtager hun selv magten ved at kontrollere den valgte, men svage præsident. Stort set samtidigt opdager man at en ny bakterieform er ved at spise alt kvælstof i atmosfæren, hvilket udløser store storme og fald i lufttrykket over havet. En prognose siger at menneskeheden højst har et år tilbage. Bakterien er en af Thorness computerens små tricks, fra inden den blev ødelagt af Fleming.
André hjælper med at få computeretn til at lave en modgift mod bakterien. Den bliver fremstillet af Madeleine Dawney og efter en indsats af Fleming, får de også lavet den manglende ingrediens til André's blod.
Gamboul bliver dræbt under en af stormene og Kaufmann forsøger at tage over, men det lykkes ikke. Fleming og Dawney redder verden ved at få bragt opskriften på bakteriemodgiften videre og kvælstoffet bobler tilbage i atmosfæren, så folk igen kan trække vejret ubesværet. Stormvejrene bliver også mere normale og alt ender godt igen. Intel bliver demonteret.
Fleming får André til at nulstille computeren, men først viser hun ham lige billeder af de væsener, der har sendt budskabet. Det er ubevægelige skikkelser på en klode under en blå sol.
Bogen er en fortsættelse af A for Andromeda (på dansk: Angrebet fra Andromeda eller Budskabet fra Andromeda). A for Andromeda var oprindeligt manuskript til en tv-serie. BBC har slettet båndene.
Bogen kan også læses som en ophobning af klicheer, britisk stiff upper lip, britisk politi, britisk militær, britiske videnskabsmænd i hvide kitler, kvinder der skal reddes, rige oliestater styret af brutale militærfolk, onde megakoncerner, løbske kunstige bakterier osv. show less
Oct 30, 2012 (Edited)Danish
1
Members
- Recently Added By
Author Information
Some Editions
Series
Belongs to Publisher Series
Work Relationships
Common Knowledge
- Canonical title*
- Andermaal Andromeda
- Original title
- Andromeda Breakthrough
- Original publication date
- 1964
- Related movies
- The Andromeda Breakthrough (1962 | IMDb)
*Some information comes from Common Knowledge in other languages. Click "Edit" for more information.
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 255
- Popularity
- 126,601
- Reviews
- 7
- Rating
- (3.33)
- Languages
- 5 — Dutch, English, French, Italian, Swedish
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 12
- UPCs
- 1
- ASINs
- 20






























































