The Children Who Lived in a Barn
by Eleanor Graham
On This Page
Description
Suitable for both adults and children to read, this 1938 novel shows five children successfully looking after themselves when their parents go away and fail to return.Tags
Recommendations
Member Recommendations
betsytacy In Baby Island, two sisters are shipwrecked on a island with a passel of babies to take care of, and in The Children Who Lived in a Barn, a 13-year-old girl is left in charge of her siblings when her parents take a brief trip and don't return. Both books show the resourceful of children in the absence of adults.
Sakerfalcon Resourceful children left to cope alone. Castaway Christmas is slightly more plausible, but both are enjoyable, old fashioned stories.
Member Reviews
When their parents are called away unexpectedly, in order to care for their maternal grandmother who is living abroad, the five Dunnett children are left very much on their own in this vintage British children's novel. When mother and father Dunnett do not return, and the landlord turns them out of their rented house in the small village of Wyden, thirteen-year-old Susan, twelve-year-old Bob, nine-year-old twins Joseph and Samuel (Jumbo and Sambo), and seven-year-old Alice move into the barn offered by their neighbor, Farmer Pearl. Here, throughout the spring, summer and autumn seasons, they must care for themselves, with a little adult help, and keep the interfering "do-gooder" women of the village from splitting them up and sending show more them to homes and orphanages. Their father told them to stick together, and so they will, becoming the children who live in a barn...
Originally published in 1938 by the London-based G. Routledge, The Children Who Lived in a Barn was reprinted in revised format in 1955 by Puffin Books, and featured newly-commissioned artwork from illustrator Mary Gernat (the original illustrator was J.D. Evans). It was then reprinted more recently, in 2001, by Persephone Books, who do not usually produce children's titles. The author was the editor of Puffin Books, beginning during the Second World War, so it is not difficult to see how the title was selected for republication in the 1950s. What changes were made between the original and the new edition I couldn't say, having only read the latter, but the colophon of my paperback Puffin copy does indicate that it is a revised edition. In any case, leaving that publication history aside, I found this an engaging read, and am glad it was selected by the group of friends with whom I regularly meet, in order to discuss (amongst other things) the children's books we are reading. I was conscious while reading of some annoyance with Susan's siblings, who always left her the lion's share of the work, and how this was validated in the narrative, but other than that I thought the story here was very entertaining, and I enjoyed seeing how the Dunnett children dealt with their unusual situation. I also appreciated the glimpses offered into a different time, and couldn't help reflecting that if this were the present day, the children would not have been allowed to stick together, but would have been speedily dispatched by children's services. The happy ending here felt a little rushed, but was satisfactory all the same. Recommended to readers who enjoy vintage children's fare, and stories about children doing for themselves. show less
Originally published in 1938 by the London-based G. Routledge, The Children Who Lived in a Barn was reprinted in revised format in 1955 by Puffin Books, and featured newly-commissioned artwork from illustrator Mary Gernat (the original illustrator was J.D. Evans). It was then reprinted more recently, in 2001, by Persephone Books, who do not usually produce children's titles. The author was the editor of Puffin Books, beginning during the Second World War, so it is not difficult to see how the title was selected for republication in the 1950s. What changes were made between the original and the new edition I couldn't say, having only read the latter, but the colophon of my paperback Puffin copy does indicate that it is a revised edition. In any case, leaving that publication history aside, I found this an engaging read, and am glad it was selected by the group of friends with whom I regularly meet, in order to discuss (amongst other things) the children's books we are reading. I was conscious while reading of some annoyance with Susan's siblings, who always left her the lion's share of the work, and how this was validated in the narrative, but other than that I thought the story here was very entertaining, and I enjoyed seeing how the Dunnett children dealt with their unusual situation. I also appreciated the glimpses offered into a different time, and couldn't help reflecting that if this were the present day, the children would not have been allowed to stick together, but would have been speedily dispatched by children's services. The happy ending here felt a little rushed, but was satisfactory all the same. Recommended to readers who enjoy vintage children's fare, and stories about children doing for themselves. show less
(25 December 2011 – from Ali)
A charming book, half-remembered as I read it, so I must have absorbed the Puffin edition as a younger reader, about five siblings whose parents disappear. Set in the 1930s, a more innocent time, although obviously with more freedom, too, we see what happens when the village pulls together, in various ways, to support them when they move into a local barn. Sue struggles with the housework, her 11 year old brother does all the DIY, and the twins and youngest girl cause all sorts of mischief. I love it because it tells you exactly how they go about doing things, something reminiscent of the Swallows and Amazons books and very satisfying (not that I will ever feel the need to construct a haybox or cook a show more rabbit), and for the emotional sincerity. As other reviewers have mentioned, the part of the plot involving the parents is a little clunky, but it really doesn’t matter, as the book does what it sets out to do, and there are some great scenes and character development, as well as the excellently portrayed sibling relationships. A great read. show less
A charming book, half-remembered as I read it, so I must have absorbed the Puffin edition as a younger reader, about five siblings whose parents disappear. Set in the 1930s, a more innocent time, although obviously with more freedom, too, we see what happens when the village pulls together, in various ways, to support them when they move into a local barn. Sue struggles with the housework, her 11 year old brother does all the DIY, and the twins and youngest girl cause all sorts of mischief. I love it because it tells you exactly how they go about doing things, something reminiscent of the Swallows and Amazons books and very satisfying (not that I will ever feel the need to construct a haybox or cook a show more rabbit), and for the emotional sincerity. As other reviewers have mentioned, the part of the plot involving the parents is a little clunky, but it really doesn’t matter, as the book does what it sets out to do, and there are some great scenes and character development, as well as the excellently portrayed sibling relationships. A great read. show less
An interesting and lively read. The main premise - of five children living mostly independently, helped by some neighbours and hindered/harassed by others - is clearly marked historically (some of the villagers think it entirely reasonable that a girl of not-yet-fourteen should be looking after her whole family by herself with no parents - but this is the 30s and in a rural setting). The powerlessness of the children in the face of antagonistic adults and the hard work needed to run a house - indeed, the impossibility of doing so long-term in the circumstances that they're in - is well-written, and even the happy ending is not too deus ex machina.
The Children Who Lived in a Barn is a children’s novel, set in an English village. When Mr. and Mrs. Dunnet are called away to be with a sick relative, they leave their five children (Susan, Bob, Joseph and Samuel the twins—called Jumbo and Sambo—and Alice) at home to manage by themselves. When the children are evicted, they move into a local barn, which they quickly make into a cozy home.
It’s a charming story. Of course, the logical side of my brain keeps poking holes in the story line—there’s no way in real life that these children, the oldest of whom is 14, would ever be allowed to stay at home by themselves or live in a barn. But the fantasy is part of the charm of this novel, and I’m sure that if I’d read this show more growing up, I would have enjoyed it much more. The novel kid of reminds me of the Bobbsey twins, mixed with the Boxcar Children series that I read when I was younger.
I liked watching how the five children managed, particularly under the direction of Susan, who seems so much older than 14, and Bob, who seems much older than 13 (it’s always in novels that children seem older than they really are!). The ending is of course completely implausible, a bit of a dues ex machina with a heavy number of coincidences in order to wrap up the story, but I kind of liked it, in an odd way. Part of the fun of children’s books is how escapist they are; things don’t have to make sense, which is something I tend to forget when I’m reading! In all, an enjoyable book, but since I’m out of practice in reading children’s books,I didn’t like this one as much as some of the pther Persephones I’ve read. show less
It’s a charming story. Of course, the logical side of my brain keeps poking holes in the story line—there’s no way in real life that these children, the oldest of whom is 14, would ever be allowed to stay at home by themselves or live in a barn. But the fantasy is part of the charm of this novel, and I’m sure that if I’d read this show more growing up, I would have enjoyed it much more. The novel kid of reminds me of the Bobbsey twins, mixed with the Boxcar Children series that I read when I was younger.
I liked watching how the five children managed, particularly under the direction of Susan, who seems so much older than 14, and Bob, who seems much older than 13 (it’s always in novels that children seem older than they really are!). The ending is of course completely implausible, a bit of a dues ex machina with a heavy number of coincidences in order to wrap up the story, but I kind of liked it, in an odd way. Part of the fun of children’s books is how escapist they are; things don’t have to make sense, which is something I tend to forget when I’m reading! In all, an enjoyable book, but since I’m out of practice in reading children’s books,I didn’t like this one as much as some of the pther Persephones I’ve read. show less
An old-fashioned feelgood tale, set at the original time of writing, about a family of children who are forced to live in a barn after their parents disappear and the landlord throws them out. They make shift to look after themselves by cooking in a haybox, mending their own clothes, and doing odd jobs around the village, befriended by the schoolteacher and a local tramp, harassed by the District Visitor, who - aided by the respectable middle-class ladies of the village - plots to get them separated and sent to foster homes. It offers a stereotypical but informative and not over-romanticized view of life in rural England in the 1930s. MB 10-i-2018
The story is what it says -- a family of children (some of them old enough to make it fairly plausible) live on their own in a barn after their parents disappear, repelling the attempts of do-gooders to take them away, and living by the rule ""No begging, borrowing, scrounging or stealing." I suppose their self-reliance may be intended as a conservative moral lesson, but as a child I simply liked it as a story.
This a sweet little cosy read - which I finished very quickly. The children are engaing in an old fashioned way, and the situation they find themselves in - while it feels unrealistic to an adult - would read like a huge adventure to a child reader I suppose. I always find with books originally written for children from this sort of period - that they're written in such a different way to modern children's books, wordier with greater depth, and better description. Its this which probably make them more accesible to adults, than many modern childrens books would be. Highly enjoyable - loved it!
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
Persephone
148 works; 3 members
Author Information
22+ Works 565 Members
Some Editions
Series
Belongs to Publisher Series
Persephone (27)
Puffin Story Books (91)
Common Knowledge
- Canonical title
- The Children Who Lived in a Barn
- Original publication date
- 1938
- People/Characters
- Dunnett children
- First words
- The whole family except Daddy were in the dining-room when the telegram came.
- Last words
- (Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)'Up to Dunnets,' yawned Bob, 'I expect we'll still have to trudge another mile or so! Let's have another chocolate. Or do we still eat fair?'
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 240
- Popularity
- 134,778
- Reviews
- 10
- Rating
- (3.92)
- Languages
- English
- Media
- Paper
- ISBNs
- 2
- ASINs
- 8



































































