Candle in the Window

Candle in the Window is the first book in Christina Dodd’s Castle Duet. It’s also the first book she ever published and the first book of hers that I’ve read. It’s a medieval historical romance about a brave and noble knight named William who was blinded from a blow to the head during battle. Ever since, he’s been a shell of his former self, stewing in self-pity and feeling useless. Desperate to find a way to reach his son, William’s father, Lord Peter, visits nearby Pertrade Castle, where he’s heard a blind young woman who doesn’t seem disabled at all resides. Lord Peter is impressed with the lovely Saura, and when she agrees to help, he persuades her stepfather to allow her to return to his estate of Burke to act as show more their housekeeper. There she whips both Burke and William into shape, drawing him out of his doldrums. As they work closely together they begin to fall for one another. But an enemy lurks outside the castle walls, lying in wait, and when William and Saura go on an outing, they find themselves kidnapped. They quickly discover that their captor is none other than someone William thought was a friend. However, he’s not the mastermind behind the plot. The pair manage to escape and make their way back to Burke, but the danger still awaits them. Before they can figure out who might harbor ill will toward them, he strikes again, but not before William asks Saura to be his bride. William will get the chance to conquer his enemy, but first he must conquer Saura’s heart and her uncertainties about their future in order to convince her that they’re meant to be together.

Saura has been blind since birth, but her mother insisted that she be treated no different than an able-bodied person. As a result, she can run a castle with precision and gets around in familiar surroundings without help. But in spite of this, her cruel stepfather views her as useless and resents not being able to marry her off. When Lord Peter comes with his offer of a secure place to stay in exchange for helping William and returning order to his own castle, she’s eager to get out from under her stepfather’s thumb. She becomes an efficient mistress at Burke and gives William a metaphorical kick in the seat of his pants to get him to see that he still has much to offer the world. She also teaches him how to navigate the world as a blind person. Gradually she begins to fall for the proud warrior, and while in close quarters during their kidnapping ordeal, they give in to their passion prompting William to offer marriage. But when events change the dynamic in their relationship, Saura fears that as a blind person herself, she has little to offer him in return. Still, during their wedding celebration, she uses her keen sense of hearing in an attempt to ferret out their enemy, but when the stubborn William doesn’t agree with her choice of suspect, she once again feels like she’s unvalued. After their adversary kidnaps her a second time, though, she finally gets a chance to shine. Overall, I liked Saura but I couldn’t help feeling that her characterization was uneven and there were times when her convoluted thinking didn’t make much sense to me. She begins the story as a strong, confident woman who has learned to navigate the sighted world as a blind person, and I loved how she gave William exactly the push he needed to rise out of his depression. But when William asks her to marry him, she suddenly becomes filled with insecurities and self-doubt that I didn’t fully understand even when it was finally explained. Also although William declares his love for her a number of times, she resists reciprocating, which also didn’t make a lot of sense to me, because IMHO, most women would be thrilled to have a man be so demonstrative of his affection. So while she was a generally likable character, she could also be quite confusing at times.

William is a widower with a young son and a brave and noble knight who’s never known aught but running Burke and slaying his enemies on the battlefield. So when he loses his sight, he also loses his way. When his father brings Saura back to their castle, he sometimes finds her amusing, while at others infuriating. After he eventually discovers that she’s a young woman and blind like him, he gains a great deal of respect for her, while also falling in love with her. Together, they make a formidable team when they’re kidnapped, and even before he makes love to her during that time, he knew he wanted to marry her. However, when he declares his love and asks for her hand, Saura’s insecurities start to come out, leaving William at a loss for how to get her to believe that he truly loves her and wants a future with her. Of course, their enemy is still out there just waiting to strike again, too, and eventually William gets the chance to do battle with him to save his lady fair. William is basically a what-you-see-is-what-you-get kind of guy, a warrior and a man’s man type of hero. I found myself having somewhat mixed feelings about him. On the one hand, he’s the first to declare his love for Saura and keeps pressing his suit with her, which is something I liked very much. However, I couldn’t help wanting him to be a little more vulnerable. We finally get a scene at the very end, where he is quite vulnerable, but I would have liked a little more of that woven throughout. Then there are a couple of scenes where he skirted perilously close to the dreaded forced seduction (one scene arguably was) and a few times when he makes some very off-color statements regarding women. There’s also a scene where he slaps a female servant in the face, and while she arguably deserved it, I loathe seeing a man raise a hand to a woman for any reason. I know all this was probably more historically accurate, but these moments just felt misogynistic to my modern sensibilities. While I can appreciate being factually correct, I appreciate even more the fantasy of romance and prefer for it to not be quite this realistic. So while he didn’t drive me crazy like some romance heroes have, William had both good points and bad points.

Candle in the Window appears to be well-loved by fans of Christina Dodd (according to her website, many fans cite it as their favorite of her works), and for her first effort, it was a pretty good story that I mostly enjoyed. I waffled a lot on how many stars to give it, but ultimately there were just too many flaws for me to give it a top rating. In addition to my already metioned issues with the characterizations, I felt that the story was over-long. At 437 pages, it’s a pretty thick book, and there were times that the pace needlessly dragged with not much happening. There are places where the narrative and/or dialogue became a little too verbose, as well as historical details that could have been woven in a bit more seamlessly, which only contributed to the slow pace. In spite of not being all that good at figuring out mysteries, I discerned the identity of their enemy probably about halfway through the book. Although the author tries to get the reader to question it, I never really wavered in my opinion. I was hoping she might pull a rabbit out of the hat, but when the person’s identity is revealed, I wasn’t surprised at all. Then there’s the villain being something of a cardboard cutout with very little motivation aside from simply being insane, which was kind of disappointing. Lastly there’s just something about the author’s writing style that left me feeling at a distance from her story and characters. It took me a really long time to figure it out, but I think it’s because she sometimes writes with a more omniscient voice, rather than delving into the deep POV that I crave. However, in spite of all my criticisms, I can’t deny that I kept reading and it was never really a chore to finish, which is why I went back and forth on how to rate it. I would typically award four stars to most stories like this, but I kept thinking about all these little annoying things and just didn’t feel like it warranted quite that high of a rating. Still, I enjoyed it enough to be open to trying more from Christina Dodd, maybe even the second book of the series, Castles in the Air, which features William’s best friend, Raymond, as the hero. I’m hoping that perhaps Ms. Dodd’s writing style has grown and developed more over time since this early example of her work. show less

Well, it's been a whopping 5 days since I finished this book, and although I sometimes (not often) review a book up to a month after reading, and have pretty good recall, I had to flip back through the book to remember what happened before writing this. The book was good, but not fascinating. I did enjoy reading it, and I liked that Saura was capable of handling so much on her own. (An excellent book on just how much the blind are capable of is [b:Thunder Dog: A Blind Man, His Guide Dog, and the Triumph of Trust at Ground Zero|9659034|Thunder Dog A Blind Man, His Guide Dog, and the Triumph of Trust at Ground Zero|Michael Hingson|http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51u4ub1G0pL._SL75_.jpg|14546637].)

There was humor in the book, which I show more like. show less

This was my first Christina Dodd book and I really liked it. It had a great beginning and the ending was good, but the middle lagged and was too long. I also hate when there is no epilogue-but that's just my thing. I will definitely be reading more from her.

Interesting read of a blind woman who escapes a lecherous stepfather to help a warrior who became blind due to injury. There are plots against William and Saura as Saura helps William rejoin the living and he helps Saura believe in her worth.

Overall Rating: 4.05 // Action: 3.0 / Emotion: 3.5 / Romance: 3.5 / Sensuous: 1.5 / Suspense: 3.5 // Historical Flavor: 4.5 // Laughter: 1 / Grins: 2 // Tears: 2 / Teary: 1

Candle In The Window: 4.05:
Although this was not the most exciting and emotionally touching medieval romance, Candle In The Window, was a very enjoyable read that never let the reader's interest waver.

Hero: 4.0:
Sir William of Miraval: Even though Dodd failed to give William a multitude of layers to his personality, loved that this big, loud, handsome, very alpha champion of tournaments displayed his sense of honor, his authority and a soft side. His simplistic, 'I'm just a good old country boy' ways were appealing.

Heroine: 3.0:
Lady Saura of Roget: At first Dodd really show more inspired a fascination with Saura because she was not hampered by her blindness. Saura's mother taught Saura to be self-sufficient and to dispense authority and kindness equally. It was difficult to understand and sympathize with Saura when she switched gears in the second half of the book and no longer felt herself worthy to marry William and would not open her heart to him.

Story Line: 4.0:
Very intriguing story line. When a warrior is blinded during a skirmish, his father enlists the aid of a noblewoman who efficiently served as chatelaine for her stepfather in spite of being born blind. An attraction builds between the hero and heroine and in the background, a friend looks on with envy and decides to destroy his friend and take his woman.

Action: 3.0:
Being in the mood for an exciting, action-packed 'knight in shining armor' kind of story, was a bit disappointed that action and adventure scenes were not featured abundantly.

Emotion: 3.5:
Dodd failed to inspire a deep-seeded emotional connection between the reader and William and Saura. However, the connection was strong enough to keep one reading to see how Dodd was going to get Saura past her insecurities.

Romance: 3.5:
The attraction between William and Saura was immediate and enduring. William was a one-woman man and after kissing Saura, he wanted no other. Saura was immediately attracted to William because she had never been able to dream of having a relationship with a man before and that kiss wetted her appetite.

Suspense: 3.5:
Dodd kept the reader on pins and needles as she introduced the villain hiding in the shadows watching William and Saura. Not only did one wonder which of William's friends had betrayed him, but also wondered how Dodd was going to break down the barrier around Saura's heart.

Sensuality: 1.5:
This book was written in 1991 when purple prose was the rule when writing lovemaking scenes, and Dodd followed that pattern so there was no sizzle or spice to be found in this story.

Secondary Characters: 2.5:
Dodd was incredible when she wrote secondary characters that came to life and inspired great interest. But, she dropped the ball when it came to really fleshing out their personalities and truly interweaving them into the fabric of the story.

Historical Flavor: 4.5:
Dodd imbued the entire story with a strong historical flavor. Dodd obviously researched the times. Her characters discussed the state of the nation because of the warring royals. The manner of dress and everyday activities were well described and took the reader back in time.

See Wolf Bear Does Books (http://goo.gl/in2TH) for a more in-depth, detailed review of Candle In The Window. show less

Sweet, fast-paced read. Enjoyable story with strong characters.