Picture of author.

Reviews

Showing 1-25 of 26
What struck me about this book is the lengths to which well intentioned people with high morals would go to justify compromising those morals. You see how insidious an evil idea such as slavery can be. The story was so compelling, and how disillusioned I became with the protagonist, Daniel and yet intrigued by the female characters. A good read.
 
Flagged
chailatte | 16 other reviews | Feb 5, 2024 |
This book won the Governor General’s Award for English Literature in 2012 but I somehow missed reading it then. It’s interesting that I would read it now since it deals so extensively with slavery and racism. The USA has been swamped with protests using the “Black Lives Matter” slogan for the past two weeks since a policeman in Minneapolis killed a black man by kneeling on his neck for 8 ½ minutes. The protests have gone global; even our own Prime Minister joined one in Ottawa. Has the time finally come for the injustice perpetrated against blacks ever since the time of slavery to end? Time will tell.
Daniel Dickinson brought his young family and new wife (who was also very young) from Pennsylvania to Virginia. He was brought up in the Quaker faith and was a staunch abolitionist so only the most extreme circumstances would take him to a state that allowed slavery. Those circumstances were that his wife died soon after giving birth and he was thrown out of the Quaker fellowship because he kept the young orphan Ruth in his house after his wife died. Daniel decided to marry Ruth but that only compounded the problem because she was a Methodist. With no background of farming Daniel decided to become a farmer in Virginia. He went off to an auction to purchase some machinery but ended up buying a young slave by the name of Onesimus. Daniel never could explain how he made the bid and he didn’t even have enough money so he had to leave one of his horses with the auctioneer. When Onesimus broke his leg hauling logs for the house to be built for the family the local black healer Bett said he had to stay where he was until the leg healed. Onesimus convinced Daniel to buy some piglets to raise in the bottomland where he was confined because in his previous job he had looked after pigs and it was his one skill. The future life of the Dickinsons and Onesimus and Bett and the other neighbours and even children unborn was forever changed because of Daniel’s purchase of Onesimus.
This was a powerful tale powerfully told.½
 
Flagged
gypsysmom | 16 other reviews | Jun 15, 2020 |
* I won a copy of this book via Goodreads Giveaways*

Unfortunately I was unable to get into the story. This is much more preachy and religious than I realized. The story also meanders, there doesn't feel like there's a solid storyline to it.
 
Flagged
Melissalovesreading | 1 other review | Sep 30, 2018 |
Grim story of Quaker family homesteading in the wilds of slave-holding Virginia. No sympathetic characters.
 
Flagged
FBGNewbies | 16 other reviews | Jun 20, 2018 |
In this collection of short pieces published in 2000, most only three pages long, 74 authors write about books that have made a lasting impression on them, but which they have lost or that are otherwise hard to find. The works cited are quite eclectic, including major works of fiction, children's books, travelogues and other varieties of non-fiction. While most of the books--and the authors writing about them--were unfamiliar to me, this book is 100% fascinating from beginning to end. It is difficult to put down once you start, assuming, of course, that you are a book lover. Time after time, it demonstrates the power and importance of books, and it shows all the ways, large and small, that they educate and influence the lives we lead.

There is no need to single out individual examples of these authors' reminiscences, since all are interesting and many are memorably written. You'll be looking up these "lost classics" and their authors on the internet in almost every case. I'm happy to report that most of these books are no longer "lost". Some are available in reprints or new editions, and nearly all are available used at reasonable prices from Amazon, abebooks.com, and other sources.

This book will make you think about your own lost classics, and maybe you'll dig one or two up from the back of your double-stacked shelves or the bottom of a box in the back corner of your storeroom. This book itself, I'm happy to say, doesn't appear to have imitated the fate (at least circa 2000) of its subjects. Amazon still has new copies for sale, and it was reprinted in 2011.
1 vote
Flagged
datrappert | 4 other reviews | Dec 5, 2017 |
I felt that I should have read The Purchase before reading this book as I found that it had a lot going on it with all the stories for the characters that were entwined.
 
Flagged
Jane-Phillips | 1 other review | Sep 17, 2017 |
The hard life of pioneers mixed with the horrible outrages of slavery and religious oppression. Predictable, plodding.
1 vote
Flagged
TheBookJunky | 16 other reviews | Apr 22, 2016 |
The humanity and hypocrisy of pioneer life in early America

The year is 1798. Daniel Dickenson, the father of five children is a Quaker living in Pennsylvania. His wife has just died a few months after giving birth to his youngest son. He has taken on a young woman, Ruth Boyd, an orphan and a Methodist, on a bond of indenture to help with the family during this time. Rather than return her to the almshouse as the Elders insist he feels obligated to keep her. This results in him being banished.

He packs up his family along with Ruth Boyd whom he marries and undertakes a journey to Virginia to start a new life.

The story that unfolds in The Purchase by Linda Spalding is an authentic depiction of what life was like as a pioneer in early America and embraces religion, family, morality and slavery. It is a story of hypocrisy as well as humanity.

The title, The Purchase, refers to the protagonist’s inadvertent purchase of a young boy as a slave. Dickenson, being a Quaker, is an abolitionist, and struggles with this moral dilemma throughout the story. He acts like a slave owner, albeit an enlightened one and he benefits from slave labour, yet considers himself against slavery. This ambivalence is endemic in his character and impacts on his relationships with his family and his community.

Spalding has a population of characters and yet this reader was able to discern each one and while their motivations were complex they all were believable.

This book is seamlessly plotted and powerfully written with sparse yet elegant prose and though it works on many levels they’re all expertly woven together in an intricate mosaic.

Though a remarkable accomplishment it fell short of five stars for me because I couldn’t relate to any of the characters. The time, the society, the circumstances were just too unfamiliar.
 
Flagged
RodRaglin | 16 other reviews | Jul 29, 2015 |
It's interesting to read what writers think of books by other authors. This is a collection of short essays about books that had meaning for the readers, who are themselves well-known authors. I started by reading the essays on books that I am familiar with, then those by authors that I have read, and so on. Naturally, with such variety, some were better or more interesting than others.
 
Flagged
VivienneR | 4 other reviews | Dec 8, 2014 |
I guess I didn't understand the purpose of this book--probably not helped by a several month lapse between reading beginning & ending. Such a lot of families losing their mothers. Loss, it is all loss. Was this written to show how Quakers, supposedly such thoughtful people, can slide into betraying their beliefs? Somehow I couldn't believe in the reality, despite the descriptive language.
 
Flagged
juniperSun | 16 other reviews | May 27, 2014 |
Solid conventional storytelling. Yet another angle on slavery in America, although no really new news: late 18th, early 19th century southwestern Virginia. The corrupted intimacy between black & white, men & women, owner & owned that transcends belief (Daniel Dickinson's origins are that of a Pennsylvania abolitionist Quaker, yet he becomes an owner of slaves in Virginia).
 
Flagged
Paulagraph | 16 other reviews | May 25, 2014 |
What a book---it seemed all too real as a description of history and in reading Spalding's acknowledgements one can see why---she was writing a very historical but fictional account. She is wonderfully descriptive but it's also heartbreaking to look closely, at just the very few families in the book, to see what was happening throughout different parts of this country. Some of the characters are completely appealing, achingly so in their trials to live their lives. The ending could easily use a sequel but this writing has to been exhausting.
 
Flagged
nyiper | 16 other reviews | Jan 26, 2014 |
You might say that Linda Spalding’s novel is about stewardship as Daniel Dickinson is ostracized from his Quaker community and attempts to exert his control over a new land settlement, his family, his beliefs about slavery, and his pride. Told from multiple perspectives, the novel will appeal to fans of Book of Negroes, historical fiction and Neo-Westerns.
 
Flagged
vplprl | 16 other reviews | Nov 15, 2013 |
What happens when you are faced with betraying your principles and beliefs? Can it destroy your entire life? In Linda Spalding's The Purchase, her main character, Daniel, is a Quaker who mistakenly buys a slave after having his whole life already thrown into turmoil. But his purchase of another human being marks his life and all the future decisions in it like nothing else.

Opening with Daniel Dickinson, his new, young wife, and his five children leaving the Quaker settlement they call home after Daniel's shunning by the community for marrying his young servant after his wife's untimely death, the family leaves behind all that anchors them in life and sets out on a hard journey to a new home they must carve out of the western Virginia wilderness for themselves. That they are completely unequipped for this new life and will make mistake after mistake in this new place is immediately evident in the narrative. Daniel knows nothing about the woods around them; he is no farmer, and in fact seems fairly unskilled and uniformed about the hardships he's going to put his family and himself through. It is a fool's errand on which he has embarked and one that will spawn unrelenting misery and tragedy after tragedy. Daniel's poor choices are only compounded when he takes the only cash he has to a farm implement auction and instead of buying tools, ends up buying a slave named Onesimus, having to forfeit his favorite mare, a horse that was to help him establish his farm in order to pay for the slave he doesn't want. His intention of eventually earning enough money to buy back his horse and to free Onesimus, while morally righteous, is a plan even less well-conceived, given his general ineptitude for this harsh life, than his plan to move the family into the wilderness in the first place.

Unfolding slowly over a number of years, the narrative is told by a rotating cast of characters. It is hard to tell which character is intended to carry the story as just when the mind and motivation of the character narrating starts to come into focus, the novel changes perspective and moves on in time. Add to this the fact that none of the characters are particularly appealing, every last one of them accepts being a doormat at each turn, perhaps nurtured by patriarch Daniel's weak and frustrating passivity. He wants to hold onto his dearly held Quaker beliefs but instead of lending him a strength and stature, he becomes a pitiful mockery of a principled person, leading not only the other characters to be frustrated by him but also the reader as well. Certainly the life that the family leads is a hard, brutal, and uncivilized one but the tone of the entire novel is relentlessly grim and unbending. Daniel's flaws help to explain and justify his children's attraction and allure to violence at odds with his half-hearted teachings and make the resulting tragedies inevitable. But over all, the book does a good job showing the soul-destroying power of the frontier and the difficult life that anyone choosing to try and tame it would have faced. Historically the novel seems mostly accurate although one bit that was glaringly wrong to me and made me shake my fist at the sloppiness of the passage has a large green log being thrown onto a fire and immediately blazing with flame. This does not happen with green wood. Seasoned and aged? If the fire is hot enough to sustain a round log, sure. Green wood? Not a chance in this world. And while complaining about a detail like this might seem to be nitpicking, this is a time and a place where wood fires are vital to survival and so it's not an insignificant error. This is definitely not a novel for anyone looking for a story of redemption or hope and glimmers of humor or even contentment are completely missing as well. It is a depressing and downtrodden tale from first to last.½
 
Flagged
whitreidtan | 16 other reviews | Oct 28, 2013 |
This is a very well written book in terms of the plot, but I could not warm up to any of the characters, and all seemed to not develop. Daniel, a Quaker sets off for a new life in Virginia with his four children after his wife dies in childbirth and he is excommunicated for taking in an orphaned teenager to care for the children. He marries the girl, but life in Virgina threatens all of his Quaker beliefs - beginning with taking a slave, moving through becoming indebted to others, and lastly with his children settling with locals who are violent.
 
Flagged
CarterPJ | 16 other reviews | Sep 7, 2013 |
Historically, The Purchase is fascinating as it combines several different elements of the country’s unique background. Daniel’s world is as unfamiliar to him as it is to modern readers, but it is Ms. Spalding’s succinct descriptions that allow readers to adapt and learn about this unfamiliar setting and lifestyle. The vastness of the world without towns, roads, or even neighbors plays in stark contrast to Daniel’s former life among the Quakers. The sheer number of issues Daniel faces upon his arrival at his new homestead emphasizes those differences. It is a world that is simultaneously very broad and yet very narrow and intriguing in both its possibilities and its limitations.

Daniel’s adoption of his new location provides readers with plenty of opportunities to learn about life on the Kentucky frontier and the hard-scrabble life that accompanies it. Surprisingly, Daniel has a fairly large number of neighbors, so the isolation that one associates with pioneering is not quite the issue it might have been. Then again, it is the interactions with these neighbors that cause a majority of the tension. Alongside frontier living is the element of slavery. Of particular interest is the idea that most of Daniel’s neighbors own slaves because of necessity and not because of any firm belief in the practice. With few inhabitants in the area and a constant battle for survival against a wilderness that does not want to be tamed, one or two slaves can make all the difference between eking out a living or total failure. While there is no excuse for the enslavement of any human, Ms. Spalding does an excellent job showing how easy it is for someone to become inured to the practice and even become involved in it in some fashion.

While the story revolves around Daniel Dickinson, he is more anti-hero than hero. He is stubborn, too passive in an aggressive environment, convinced of his superior intelligence among his family and neighbors, and incapable of compromise. Daniel’s Quaker beliefs clash with the unwritten rules of life on the frontier, not to mention the abolitionist tenets of the Quaker faith up against the nonchalant acceptance of the institution among Daniel’s new peers. He may accidentally purchase Onesimus and keep him as a slave, but his adamant insistence on maintaining all aspects of his belief system provides huge wells of guilt that keep him weak in a world where the weak just cannot survive. The rest of the characters are equally flawed and oh-so-very human. Their realistic attributes will generate a myriad of emotions within a reader – everything from frustration to disgust to pride to resignation – as they all make good and very poor choices that will continue to haunt them all.

While a reader can guess what some of the inevitable clashes will be from Daniel’s accidental purchase of Onesimus, it is the surprising arcs the story takes that keeps a reader’s interest. The compromise of Daniel’s beliefs so early in the story results in a profound stubbornness that does more harm than good. Combined with his Quaker passivity, the two traits, along with his initial actions upon arrival in the country, do more to cause the resultant scenes than anything else. Onesimus is a mere victim of Daniel’s belief system.

Given its subject matter, The Purchase is not the cheeriest of novels. The first-person account of slavery is as rough and disturbing as one would expect, while the characters and all their faults do little to nothing to ease a reader’s angst. Throughout the story, the overwhelming feelings of distress among all the characters, free and slave, serve to emphasize the arduousness of life on the frontier. Much like its frontier setting, it is stark and brutal and not for the easily distressed.
 
Flagged
jmchshannon | 16 other reviews | Jul 30, 2013 |
i read the Paper Wife years back,having picked it randomly at the public library. it has haunted me since then coming into my mind every now and then.
its about a college girl who gets impregnated by a friend's boyfriend during a night of partying. She turns her back on her academic life by leaving the country for Mexico, to avoid breaking her friend's heart. It is a heart rending book,facing questions of loyalty and ethics. Though the father of the baby that eventually she gives birth to, joins her to take responsibility of the child, she has to decide what life she has to choose ,one of convenience or one of sacrifice.
Beautiful story. Will read it again.
 
Flagged
sidiki | May 21, 2013 |
The hard life of pioneers mixed with the horrible outrages of slavery and religious oppression. Predictable, plodding.
 
Flagged
BCbookjunky | 16 other reviews | Mar 31, 2013 |
“There were other wagons leaving Pennsylvania and going south and west, but none were so laden with woe as the one that carried the five children and the widower and his new bride.” (4)

The Purchase opens in 1798 Pennsylvania where Daniel Dickinson has been shunned from his Quaker community by Elders for his hasty marriage to a fifteen year old orphan. The recently widowed father of five has married his young house servant, Ruth Boyd, who came to the Dickinsons from an almshouse. Ruth, a child herself, will now mother Daniel’s own orphaned children. So it is that he, his new wife, and his five children, are moving west, headed for Virginia.

Once relocated, Daniel, a firm abolitionist, finds himself the unexpected owner of a young slave, Onesimus. The “purchase” sets in motion a chain of events that visits tragedy upon tragedy on the family, and leads ultimately to murder. As the narrative unfolds, Daniel will struggle to hold fast to his beliefs in a changing world. His young, unloved wife, his willful eldest daughter’s relationship with Bett, a runaway slave, his youngest daughter’s impossible love, and the pursuits of his sons will test his Quaker values.

“When his wife died, he’d blamed the doctor, not the Lord. Disowned by his community in Brandywine, he’d decided to pack up his children and go where he might find tolerance. He had driven past the wealthy plantations crowning the hilltops of Tidewater Virginia, moving west to the rugged hand-hewn cabins of the valleys, sure that his character would adapt to the new landscape. He thought now that he should never have wished for such a thing.” (158)

The Purchase is dark, bewitching, and imbued with moral complexity. Spalding’s prose is seductive and magnetic, so much so that this is one I did not want to put down. Her characters, dark and complex and enslaved by their own burdens, are superbly written. She is a Canadian author new to me, but The Purchase is richly deserving of its 2012 Governor General’s Literary Award.

Highly recommended!
5 vote
Flagged
lit_chick | 16 other reviews | Mar 6, 2013 |
This book is beautifully written, but it is indeed very dark. The prose is lyrical, but stripped-down. This is an historical novel written in the manner of Thomas Hardy. It is unrelenting in the sadness and despair that the author portrays. The setting is Virginia at the very beginning of the 19 century. Ms. Hardy has managed to create a world within the confines of the covers of this book. The story is about a young Quaker man who's wife has just died, leaving him with five motherless children. He has brought a young Methodist servant into his house to help him with this brood and decides that he can only protect her and his family if she becomes his wife, even though she is not much older than his oldest child. As a result of this decision he is shunned from the Quaker community in Pennsylvania, and decides to set out for Virginia in order to start a farm. Daniel is lost out in the real world, and he makes some rather unfortunate choices as he tries to carve out a life for his family in the harsh Virginia wilderness. Daniel's choices and actions cause repercussions that are to be felt for years after and they rock his little family to the core. This is a harsh and unforgiving land that he settles in and every member of his family has to work against tremendous hardships in order to survive. These characters are so real and so incredibly human and the picture created of pioneer life so realistic, that I felt like I was there living in Southern Virginia, at the edges of the great American frontier. It is not an easy book to read because Ms. Spalding does not stint on the detail of the hardships and degradations that early pioneers had to endure. And the picture that is painted of slavery and of the lives of slaves during this time is unrelenting and sometimes unbearable. This book is a well-deserved winner of the 2012 Governor General's literary award.
 
Flagged
Romonko | 16 other reviews | Feb 6, 2013 |
spading writes well and drags you along but she has nothing to say. she couldn't even bother with a sensible title. did she owe her publisher money? i did learn something about american women's prisons.½
 
Flagged
mahallett | Jan 23, 2013 |
This novel appears on two 2012 award lists: the Governor General’s Award for Fiction and the Rogers Writers’ Trust Fiction Prize. I’m not certain why. The reviews I’ve read tend to be overwhelmingly positive, but I soon tired of it and struggled to finish it.

The book begins in Pennsylvania at the end of the eighteenth century. Daniel Dickinson and his young family are exiled from their Quaker community when, after his wife’s death, he hastily marries a 15-year-old indentured servant girl. They end up in south Virginia but Daniel is in no way prepared to build a new life for his family in the wilderness. To add to his problems, he purchases a young slave boy despite his abolitionist beliefs. This event is a catalyst for a long series of tragic events in the lives of family members and neighbours over multiple generations. The long-term effects of that purchase on Daniel’s children are detailed.

A major theme is that of freedom, specifically whether anyone really has freedom. The black slaves are the obvious examples of people lacking freedom, but almost everyone is enslaved somehow because of religious beliefs or prevailing societal expectations. For example, Daniel’s Quaker pacifism leaves him unable to defend himself and others against violent neighbours.

One of the problems I had with the book is the character of Daniel. The motivation of much of his behaviour is not sufficiently explained. Why, for example, does he quickly marry Ruth when he seems to have no reason to do so, especially since that decision results in his family being shunned and banished?
Though Daniel is an abolitionist and “his moral nature was unchanged,” at the auction he “felt his right arm go up as if pulled by a string” when a slave boy is being sold? Then, when his son is dying, he stops enroute to the doctor’s to reclaim a horse? Daniel’s treatment of Ruth seems unChristian as is his unforgiving attitude to his children, especially considering how he was treated by his own father.

And Daniel is not the only problem character. Mary and Bett are supposedly the best of friends, yet she takes credit for Bett’s healing skills and doesn’t give her freedom? Mary knows she needs Bett to help her with ill patients, yet she still goes to home visits by herself when she could easily have made an excuse for bringing Bett with her? Jemima adopts a way of life that will serve only to alienate her from everyone, including her family?

I found the book a harrowing read. Daniel encounters failure after failure. He betrays his moral code, albeit inadvertently, and it seems that he is continuously punished for his sin and so is his family. I guess I have difficulty with the Biblical admonishment “The sins of the father shall be visited upon the sons.”

I will continue to scan reviews to see if anyone satisfactorily addresses my concerns and enlightens me to the merits of the book; thus far I remain unconvinced. I am not, however, motivated to re-read the book; in fact, it is a purchase I wish I had not made.
 
Flagged
Schatje | 16 other reviews | Nov 8, 2012 |
Linda Spalding's new novel The Purchase is a finalist for the Governor General's Literary Award for Fiction. Trust me, it's an absolute must read.

1798. Daniel Dickinson is a devout Quaker. But when his wife dies leaving him with five young children and he quickly marries Ruth, a fifteen year old orphan, he is cast out of the fellowship. With no home and no community, he then packs his family in a wagon and heads to Virginia to homestead. At an auction to buy needed farming tools, Daniel instead ends up with a young slave boy. As an abolitionist, this goes against everything he believes in. This purchase is the catalyst for a series of events that will change the lives of family, friends, enemies and more.

I literally hurtled through the first part of The Purchase. Spalding drew me into the lives of the Dickinson family. The characters are exceptionally well drawn. Daniel struggles with his ownership of Onesimus, his marriage to a girl he doesn't even know, his efforts to build a new life for his children in a wilderness that he is ill prepared for and trying to follow his beliefs. His oldest daughter Mary is stubborn, petulant, wilful but also kind and giving. But not to her stepmother. But it is quiet, silent Ruth that I was most drawn to. And to the slave Bett as well. There is a large cast of characters, each bringing a turn in the tale. And all elicit strong emotions and reactions. The interactions between the players sets up an almost tangible sense of foreboding.

I stopped after part one, which ends on a cataclysmic note, to gather my thoughts. Where could the story go from here? I started part two a few days later and didn't put the book down until I turned the last page. And then I sat and thought again.

Spalding's prose are rich, raw, powerful and oh, so evocative. She explores so much in The Purchase - freedom, faith, family, love, loss and more.

On reading the author's notes, I discovered that The Purchase is based on Spalding's own family history. She visited sites and settings that are used in the book. I think the personal connection added so much to the book.

Brilliant. One of my top reads for 2012. Can lit rocks!
1 vote
Flagged
Twink | 16 other reviews | Oct 9, 2012 |
A keeper. Authors write about obscure books that changed their lives, books we readers should find and read.
 
Flagged
debnance | 4 other reviews | Jan 29, 2010 |
Writers writing about books from their past that have been lost to them. Full of interesting ideas and suggestions.
 
Flagged
mschaefer | 4 other reviews | May 8, 2007 |
Showing 1-25 of 26