Picture of author.

Bruce Catton (1899–1978)

Author of A Stillness at Appomattox

134+ Works 17,485 Members 122 Reviews 35 Favorited

About the Author

Bruce Catton, whose complete name was Charles Bruce Catton, was born in Petoskey, Michigan, on October 9, 1899. A United States journalist and writer, Catton was one of America's most popular Civil War historians. Catton worked as a newspaperman in Boston, Cleveland, and Washington, and also held a show more position at the U.S. Department of Commerce in 1948. Catton's best-selling book, A Stillness at Appomattox, a recount of the most spectacular conflicts between Generals Grant and Lee in the final year of the Civil War, earned him a Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award in 1954. In 1977, the year before his death, Catton received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor, from President Gerald R. Ford, who noted that the author and historian "made us hear the sounds of battle and cherish peace." Before his death in 1978, Catton wrote a total of ten books detailing the Civil War, including his last, Grant Takes Command. Since 1984, the Bruce Catton Prize was awarded for lifetime achievement in the writing of history. In cooperation with American Heritage Publishing Company, the Society of American Historians in 1984 initiated the biennial prize that honors an entire body of work. It is named for Bruce Catton, prizewinning historian and first editor of American Heritage magazine. The prize consisted of a certificate and 2,500 dollars. (Bowker Author Biography) show less
Image credit: nps.gov

Series

Works by Bruce Catton

A Stillness at Appomattox (1953) 2,099 copies, 11 reviews
Mr. Lincoln's Army (1951) 1,335 copies, 15 reviews
The Army of the Potomac: Glory Road (1952) 1,203 copies, 9 reviews
The Coming Fury (1961) 1,188 copies, 15 reviews
Terrible Swift Sword (1963) 1,112 copies, 8 reviews
Never Call Retreat (1965) 972 copies, 8 reviews
Grant Takes Command (1968) 856 copies, 3 reviews
Grant Moves South (1960) 650 copies, 3 reviews
Gettysburg: The Final Fury (1974) 347 copies, 4 reviews
Reflections on the Civil War (1981) 339 copies, 3 reviews
Michigan: A History (1976) 96 copies, 3 reviews
Banners at Shenandoah (1977) 58 copies, 1 review
American Heritage Magazine (1959) 56 copies
The War Lords of Washington. (1948) 41 copies, 1 review
American Heritage Magazine Vol 09 No 4 1958 June (1958) — Editor — 19 copies
The Civil War (1965) 9 copies
Antietam (2016) 7 copies
Prefaces to history (1970) 6 copies
Great Historical Places (1957) 3 copies
A STARRY CHRISTMAS NIGHT. (1972) 2 copies
Shiloh (2017) 1 copy

Associated Works

Report of the Warren Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy (1964) — Afterword, some editions — 1,088 copies, 7 reviews
Co. Aytch: A Confederate Memoir of the Civil War (1882) — Contributor, some editions — 995 copies, 17 reviews
The American Heritage Book of The Revolution (1958) — Introduction, some editions — 727 copies, 6 reviews
A Sense of History: The Best Writing from the Pages of American Heritage (1985) — Contributor — 490 copies, 4 reviews
The Golden Book of the Civil War (1984) — Introduction — 361 copies, 2 reviews
The Golden Book of the American Revolution (1959) — Introduction — 108 copies, 2 reviews
American Heritage Magazine Vol 16 No 5 1965 August (1965) — Contributor — 32 copies
The Greatest War Stories Ever Told: Twenty-Four Incredible War Tales (2001) — Contributor — 31 copies, 1 review

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Discussions

Shelfby Foote v. Bruce Catton v. James McPherson in American Civil War (July 2017)

Reviews

160 reviews
Shelby Foote completely satisfied my appetite for books about the ACW for a decade or so, but it looks like I'm reading this stuff again.

This is very well-written, although it gets a little purple near the end. Very thorough on the Battle of Antietam, and good on McClellan as well.

A very positive reference to Sandburg's Lincoln biography has made me decide to revisit that.
½
In this second of his Army of the Potomac Trilogy, the author has smoothed out all the rough edges of his first volume, Mr. Lincoln's Army. His strengths in telling vignettes is maintained and spread out through more of the book. This is an embedded reporter's point of view. His battle descriptions are more balanced as well, though they still suffer somewhat from ignoring certain key elements. Ultimately, it must be understood that this is a rather biased view of events in that it not only show more is covering the Army of the Potomac, and is, thus, leaving out -- I would say unnecessarily -- important aspects of what is happening on that army's opponent's side. It is also prone to embellish somewhat the part of its subject's actions. I can elaborate on both these points, by citing the Gettysburg battle. The author describes great efforts by the Union soldiers to avoid defeat. In many cases, barely hanging on by a thread, so to speak. Extraordinary efforts are painted in bright colors. And yet, there's not a word about all the criticism that has been laid on Confederate generals Ewell, Longstreet, and especially Stuart, for what they did NOT do, and maybe could have. Lack of action that, if the author is to be taken at face value, would most certainly have caused the Union army to be crushed. I appreciate that applauding the efforts of "your team", just as in sports, requires some positive comments, but barely winning a ball game can be viewed in a very different light when the opposing team is the best in the league and when it's against the junior varsity. This author had a choice to go for good public relations or good history, and he didn't always go for good history. Having said that, this is still a terrific read. Downright exciting at times. It's my own advanced knowledge of the subject that keeps me from giving it my highest rating. show less
The third, and final volume in Catton’s famous Centennial History of the Civil War, Never Call Retreat details final dying convulsions of the Confederacy, and the relentless men who made it hold on grimly to the last as well as the much less relentless men who drove it to extinction. The book shows that the paradox of the Civil War is that the destruction of the Confederacy was accomplished as much by self-inflicted wounds as it was the result of Union efforts.

This book shows clearly that show more the tragedy of the Confederacy was not that men like Grant, Sherman, Thomas, Sheridan, and Farragut ground it into oblivion, but rather that men like Davis, Hood, and Hunter refused to surrender despite their position being hopeless. Hunter’s delusions are laid out clearly in the book, while Grant laid siege to Richmond, Sherman ranged free in Georgia, and Thomas was pursuing the scattered remnants of Hood’s army, Hunter met with Lincoln to talk peace, and was mortally offended that Lincoln refused to compromise on reunion and emancipation – the only two issues of consequence in the war. Even in late 1864, Hunter expected that Lincoln would treat the defeated Confederacy as an equal, not the broken, hollow shell that it was.

The central figure of the book is Grant, as the volume covers his Vicksburg campaign, ascension to command the Union armies of the west, and finally command of all the Union armies leading to the long grapple with Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. Certainly Lee comes off well in parts of the book – his defeat of Hooker at Chancellorsville, Burnside at Fredericksburg, and subsequent second invasion culminating in the Battle of Gettysburg against Meade. But the book demonstrates convincingly that these were futile efforts: Even had Lee won at Gettysburg, his army would have been too worn down to exploit his victory, and even if it had not, he could not have taken the strongly fortified federal capitol. As Grant found out a year later when he laid siege to Petersburg, a strongly entrenched army was almost undefeatable by assault, and there were more than enough troops in D.C. to ward off any assault before relief could come. Grant, laying siege to Petersburg, had plenty of time, as the Confederacy had no relief troops to send. Lee would have had no such luxury.

Through the volume Catton details the ever more desperate efforts of the Confederate leaders, even as their nation collapsed around them and their own people defected. Wild plans were made to do all manner of things: Plots to bomb hotels in New York, or rob the Union in order to provide for Confederate needs, or steal Union warships, and so on. The lunacy of the Confederate leaders led Davis to relieve Johnston, whose delaying tactics had at least slowed Sherman down, and replace him with Hood and orders to go on the offensive - a disastrous command to an army that was completely ill-equipped to the task and which only left Georgia open to plunder. The whole book gives one a taste for the true feeling of inevitability that must have gripped the entire Confederacy, evidenced by the huge volume of desertions that plagued the Confederate armies and the desperate, incredible, delusional (and, due to historical events moving to fast for it to be put into effect, untested) plan to free and arm slaves to fight in its defense.

In all this, Catton weaves the tale of the political events surrounding the war in the field: The Presidential campaign of 1864, pitting McClellan against Lincoln, the debates in Congress and among members of Lincoln’s cabinet over the questions of reconstruction following the war and the status of the now-freed slaves. Catton makes clear that Booth’s bullet cruelly ended what might have been a kinder and better run reconstruction, more effective at healing the nation than the violent and bitter version created by the enmity between Johnson and the radical Republican Congress. The book ends just after Lincoln’s assassination and the final surrender of the last organized Confederate armies (all of whom had commanders who refused to take to the hills and conduct a bitter guerrilla war: Unlike their political leaders, the Confederate generals were often able to see what was best for the interests of the South, and the Union it would have to rejoin). In many ways, the books are the history of Lincoln as a political figure – he was, after all, a surprise choice for the Republican nomination in 1860, and his death put the cap on the war itself.

This series was first published in 1960 – the centennial of the U.S. Civil War. Every Civil War historian since then has been influenced by this work. For most students of U.S. history, this set of three volumes marks the starting point for their study of the war, and as a result, it is a must read for anyone who wants to understand the period, and the later scholarship on the subject. Without Catton, there would be no Foote, no Burns, and no Shaara. The series is also quite clear and straightforward, laying out an incredibly confusing episode in history in a concise and reasonably easy to understand manner.

This review has also been posted to my blog Dreaming About Other Worlds.
show less
Well-written, amazing, hard to put down. Catton's ongoing commentary enhances the drama and provides some profound insights. After all the other Civil War books I've read, I finally understand why Antietam (the most chaotic and deadly battle) was a turning point in the war, and why.

Despite loving history, I've never been drawn to battle scenes till now. Catton makes them come alive and adds emotional drama and meaning. And grief. These "boys," as he calls them, have certainly lost their show more innocence, and their excitement about marching to war. After the battle, thousands upon thousands on both sides lay wounded in the fields all night, crying in pain and calling for help that never came. Very poignant.

This is book #1 in Catton's trilogy "Army of the Potomac." Now on to the next: "Glory Road" and, finally, "A Stillness at Appomattox."

Highly recommended if you want a detailed history of the Civil War.
show less

Lists

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
134
Also by
21
Members
17,485
Popularity
#1,266
Rating
4.1
Reviews
122
ISBNs
277
Languages
3
Favorited
35

Charts & Graphs