Barry Werth

Great follow up to his first book, The Billion Dollar Molecule. For me origin stories are more fascinating than the "maintenance" story. This book "feels" right with respect to the topic - its frantic prose matches the pace of science - many fits and starts - especially for a company that's 1. invested in beating out the competition with a tighter budget, 2. maturing to a proper drug producing pharmaceutical business. The investigative reporting is extremely thorough and if you're not into show more the science or business, it'll fail to appeal to you. For me it was too much on the financial side of things - constant monitoring of stock prices - I would have to have a better grasp of the business side to appreciate it. I liked the last part, which was quite revealing and transparent about the drug approval process from the trenches. show less

Connecting Darwin to social Darwinism

Darwinian theories of natural selection and evolution have been used (and misused) to explain just about everything. Charles Darwin himself never intended it so, the naturalist was a biologist and his theories were meant to be applied apolitically, amorally. But the idea of evolution, positivism, was just too irresistibly easy to be applied to social, political, and economic contexts.

In Barry Werth's new book, he traces the emergence of "social Darwinism" show more in America through the central characters of Herbert Spencer, Henry Ward Beecher, and Andrew Carnegie. Werth shows how Darwin's theories were institutionalized within every aspect of American society because it comfortably fit witin the context of the Gilded era but also because it conveniently supplied an ideology which explained American foundational principles of republicanism, Protestantism, and post-reconstruction Jim Crow.

If there is a criticism of the book, it is the excessive biographical information on Ward and Carnegie, which results in a bloated narrative. Otherwise, Werth's analysis is spot on and he uses plenty of great secondary sources to support his arguments.

Overall, a great read. Werth's book helps to connect the dots between Darwin and the philosophy of social Darwinism. show less

Werth's book about a company's inception and its revolutionary use of rational drug design should be required reading for all in the sciences. It highlights to amazing extents the pros and cons of academia and industry, and as a current PhD student, I can fully relate to the issues. The scientific struggles of publishing and politics are all excruciatingly detailed, and you're left in awe of the immense strength and will of the characters. Werth's prose is riveting as well. I wish there were show more a more recent book of equal calibre, detailing maybe a company's trials in genomic medicine. show less

http://nhw.livejournal.com/725046.html

This account takes us from 9 August 1974, the day the Richard Nixon became the first US president to resign from office, to 8 September, the day that his successor, Gerald Ford, issued "a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974."

The book has two real plot show more strands, first, Ford's decision to issue the pardon and the subsequent negotiations over details with Nixon, and second, the scrabbling for office in the Ford White House, especially the decision to nominate Nelson Rockefeller as Vice-President rather than the other obvious candidate, George Bush the elder (or the last-minute dark horse alternative, Donald Rumsfeld - Ronald Reagan also fancied himself in the running, but Ford couldn't even remember how to spell his name).

The first is, of course, the key to the failure of Ford's presidency. Werth paints a convincing psychological and political picture of why Ford decided to do it so soon, against the advice of almost everyone he asked: the shock of realising, after his first press conference, that the issue of his predecessor's fate was going to drown out attention to his own programme for government until it was settled, combined with his experience as a youth of concluding his relations with his absent biological father. There is no clear record that anyone said to Ford that the move would expend all his political capital and kill his moral authority stone dead; but it is abundantly clear that Ford felt he couldn't live with himself until the decision was made, and would not have been swayed even if the argument had been put to him in those terms.

The second was a contributory factor to Ford's inability to pull things round in time. Like John Adams and Lyndon B Johnson, he did not change enough of the cabinet, despite open treachery from his Secretary of Defense literally as he was being sworn in. His press secretary, one of his oldest friends, was out of the loop about the planned pardon for Nixon, and in consequence stole the headlines by resigning the same day. Having promised George Bush senior something decent in compensation for not getting the Vice-Presidency, all he could come up with was the post of Ambassador to China (this after Bush, as the US representative at the UN, had fought tooth and nail against the de-recognition of Taiwan). Al Haig was clearly a menace. The picture that comes across is of a very nice guy who simply lacked the killer instinct.

(Having said that, of course, he still came pretty close to re-election in 1976 - less than 2% behind in the popular vote, and closer than that in Ohio and Wisconsin which would have been enough to beat Carter).

Much else happening in this period as well, and given my own interests I would have liked more on the Cyprus crisis, which of course was in full swing that summer (including - a detail I had forgotten if I ever knew it - the assassination of the US Ambassador by a Greek Cypriot gunman in Nicosia), but I guess the fact that it appears mainly as background colour tells me most of what I would want to know. (In any case the Kissinger Archives have much more detail.)

There are lots of other charming details; the description of Jerry and Betty Ford dancing with the king and Queen of Jordan at the end of their first week; the account of the impact of events on Betty's life is compassionate.

I can't give the book full marks, unfortunately. I would have liked a judgement from the author, not just from quoted commentators, about the morality of some of the things that were done and decisions made - in particular the disposition of Nixon's state papers, which at one point were piled so high on the third floor of the Old Executive Office Building that the Secret Service worried it might cave in.

The other missing element for me was that, while we learn a great deal about Ford's own background, and a decent amount on the other older characters, Nixon, Rockefeller, Bush, Haig, we find out very little about the the new generation empowered by Nixon's fall and Ford's brief ascendancy - Rumsfeld, Richard Cheney, Richard Perle, etc. They appear pretty much out of nowhere in the narrative, and the book therefore fails to really deliver on its promise to explain how the crisis "Gave Us The [American] Government We Have Today". show less