Leon M. Lederman (1922–2018)

What is a Higgs boson, and if we can’t keep one of our own, why should you or I care? Well, Leon Lederman, the 1988 Nobel Laureate in physics, just might make you care, through a combination of anecdotes, jokes, and good solid explanations.

The God Particle is a pretty complete narrative of man’s effort to answer the question of what is the ultimate stuff. His task in telling the oft told tale, he says, is much like being Zsa Zsa Gabor’s seventh husband: he knows what to do, but how show more does he make it interesting?

For about a decade, Lederman was the Director of Fermilab and its Tevatron, the huge particle accelerator in Batavia, Illinois. He was and remains an experimentalist at heart, with a fair amount of disdain for pure theorists (albeit tempered by a great deal of humor). His personal professional quest has been not only to guess at what makes up the world, but to build the incredible machines that can actually detect the nearly infinitesimal.

He recapitulates the efforts of the pre-Socratic Greek philosophers in a fictional wisecracking dialog between himself and Democritus, who somehow turns up in the 20th century. Democritus describes how his predecessors and contemporaries tried to answer the question by positing that the world was composed of a single or just a few basic substances that change form. I knew the story from a course in college and several later accounts in science or philosophical histories, but Lederman’s version is the most entertaining. Democritus turns out to be Lederman’s hero because he guessed the world was composed only of atoms and the void. To Democritus, an atom (or A-tom, as Lederman calls it) is the irreducible substance. Since the time of the early Greeks, we have come to discover pretty basic things we call atoms, but we now know they are far from irreducible. In fact, even the subatomic particles that compose atoms, which we once thought were the smallest things in existence, turn out to be composed of quarks held together by gluons.

Lederman’s history has some interesting factoids that were new to me. For example, Galileo was able to conduct experiments that required precise measurement of time before stop watches were invented. An accomplished musician, he measured time by listening to music while watching the progress of balls rolling down inclined planes. At the beat of a march, a competent musician can detect an error of about one sixty-fourth of a second.

Lederman gives the usual credit to Brahe, Kepler, Newton (of course), Faraday, and Maxwell, but he adds a new one (for me at least): this is Roger Boscovich (b. 1711 in Dubrovnik), who theorized the existence of particles of matter with no dimensions. Lederman says “We found a particle that fits such a description. It’s called a quark.”

Next Lederman tells us of the development of quantum mechanics and today’s picture of the subatomic world, the so called “standard model.” Niels Bohr came up with a radical theory in order to explain the presence and sizes of the then known spectral lines: electrons revolve around the nucleus only at allowed radii or energy levels, only where their angular momentum takes on an integer value of Planck’s constant (4.11 x 10 to the -15th power eV-seconds). Bohr’s electrons absorb energy exclusively in allowed quanta and drop spontaneously from one allowed radius to another. In doing so, they emit a photon whose energy equals the drop in energy level of the electron. De Broglie improved Bohr’s model by accounting for the particular size of the radii of the orbits. If electrons were wavelike, then the orbit sizes could only be integer multiples of the electron’s wave length! But orbiting electrons would radiate energy, and eventually collapse into the nucleus, which doesn’t happen. So something remained fishy about the concept of the orbiting electron.

Heisenberg said you just can’t envision an atom. Orbits could not be measured, but spectral lines could be, so ignore orbits. Heisenberg developed a theory called matrix mechanics, based on matrices, to deal with the data. Schrodinger developed the wave function, ψ, a differential equation which contained all we know or can know about the electron. (It was later demonstrated that Heisenberg’s matrices and Schrodinger’s equation were mathematically equivalent.) Schrodinger thought he had discovered “matter waves,” but that could not be. The question was, “what was waving?” Max Born came up with the answer in that the only consistent interpretation of ψ (actually, ψ squared) was that it represented the probability of finding an electron in the places calculated. Electrons and other particles act like particles when they are detected, but their distribution in space between measurements follows the wavelike probability patterns that emerge from the Schrodinger equation. Lederman calls this interpretation “the single most dramatic and major change in our world view since Newton.”

Paul Dirac tried to make quantum theory compatible with relativity, and in doing so formulated the Dirac equation which implied not only that electrons must spin and produce magnetism, but that there must exist another particle identical to the electron except with an opposite charge. That particle, the positron, was later discovered by Carl Anderson in a cloud chamber at Cal Tech.

Another physical property of matter derived from the relevant equations is the uncertainty principle. Heisenberg deduced from Schrodinger’s equation that the determination of the location and momentum of an electron must always be uncertain. In fact, the product of the 2 uncertainties must always be greater than Planck’s constant.

Having acquainted the reader with a modicum of quantum theory, Lederman then describes the marvelous machines used to split atoms and create many bizarre subatomic particles. He also shows how those particles now fall into families, based on their properties. There is a clearly seen symmetry among the particles thus far discovered. Matter consists of quarks and leptons, with bosons being the carriers of forces. However, the list seems incomplete. As Dirac inferred the existence of positrons from equations, modern physicists infer the existence of the granddaddy of the particles, the Higgs boson, from the symmetry of the known subatomic particles.

The problem is that no existing atom smasher or super collider has yet achieved the energy necessary to create a Higgs boson.

Lederman argues for the funding to create the super colliding superconductor in order to determine if nature really is a symmetrical as it appears it might be. Finding an actual Higgs boson would the complete symmetry sought by the theorists.

This book is more lighthearted than any other physics book of similar depth. I highly recommend it.

(JAB) show less

It was (Nobelist, religion-free) Lederman who coined the Higgs boson's stupid nickname in the title of his 1990s book, and it is unforgivable of him to have repeated that blunder here. Also, the text should have been proofread more carefully or competently. That said, this is a fine book that stands apart from other Higgs-focused particle-physics popularizations in its painstaking explanation of the role of particles' handedness oscillations in their acquisition of mass. Lots about show more ultra-powerful "microscopes" (particle accelerators), and past and future experimental doings at Fermilab. A meaty appendix summarizes the Standard Model. show less

This was an excellent if sometimes confusing book to read, but if you put in the effort, it is an excellent read. Lederman starts from the beginning with the Greek philospher Democritas and his a-tom. The author goes on to describe numerous eureka moments in the field of Nuclear Physics. This, at least to me, adds a lot of excitement to the story. You can almost feel the Physicist's inner demons as they travel from disappointment to that tantlizing moment, of knowing something that no one show more else in the world knows. He explains the particle acclerator, which is the main tool of Nuclear physics. Lederman speaks of the SSC, or the Superconducting Super Collider, located in Texas, unfortunately, the book was published before the United States turned its back on science. Now our physicists must travel to CERN (The European Center for Nuclear Research) in Geneva, to complete their research. I think America has forgotten. The only reason we have led the world was due to science, and now the Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate, who believe the universe is only 6,000 years old, do their best to eliminate all fields of endeavour that dispute their false beliefs. Too bad for us, we elected them. show less

Makes a wild curveball assertion that gravity it caused by potential energy of atoms in chapter six. ( And had a wonderful mixed metaphor in chapter two ' ... driving a silver stake through ... ' Silver stake being a combination of ' silver bullet wooden stake ' ) The chapter about chemistry and Pauli is worth reading twice