Susan Stryker
Author of Transgender history
About the Author
Susan Stryker is the coauthor of "Gay by the Bay", a historical look at gay life in San Francisco, as well as "Gay Pulp" and "Lesbian Pulp Address Books". She currently works as Executive Director of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender Historical Society in San Francisco. (Bowker Author show more Biography) show less
Image credit: Susan Stryker
Works by Susan Stryker
Gay by the Bay: A History of Queer Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area (1996) 134 copies, 1 review
Postposttranssexual: Key Concepts for a 21st Century Transgender Studies (Volume 1) (TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly) (2014) 30 copies
Screaming Queens: The Riot at Compton's Cafeteria [2005 film] (2005) — Director — 22 copies, 1 review
Associated Works
We Both Laughed In Pleasure: The Selected Diaries of Lou Sullivan (2019) — Introduction — 205 copies, 5 reviews
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Birthdate
- unknown
- Gender
- female
- Education
- University of California, Berkeley (1992)
- Occupations
- Post-Doctoral Research Fellow (Stanford University)
Associate Professor of Gender Studies (Indiana Univeristy at Bloomington) - Nationality
- USA
- Associated Place (for map)
- USA
Members
Reviews
This book gave me A People's History vibes, in that it portrays, over and over, how the work of progress is done NOT primarily by the men on our TV screens, in elected office, behind pulpits or podiums, but by ordinary people, banding together in ways that are somehow haphazard, inventing communities and services and safety nets BECAUSE THEY NEED TO, and because no one else will/has.
A few of these stories I had at least some familiarity with, but so much of this has been show more ignored/suppressed/distorted that this is clearly a rescue operation for endangered stories.
A remarkable work. show less
A few of these stories I had at least some familiarity with, but so much of this has been show more ignored/suppressed/distorted that this is clearly a rescue operation for endangered stories.
A remarkable work. show less
Transgender History, second edition: The Roots of Today's Revolution (Seal Studies) by Susan Stryker
I really enjoyed this read, and learned a good deal. That said, if you are looking for objective historical reporting this is not the volume for you. There is nothing dry about this, but there is also a clear editorial slant, so if that is an issue be warned.
Stryker is a good and almost conversational writer. This could not be more accessible. There is some very edifying historical information about trans life and gender pioneers in the 19th and 20th centuries, and the advances since show more entering the 21st. She also presents a good framework for transgender feminism, something I think most trans feminist writers have not done terribly well. By recontextualizing feminism as not being about a history or oppression she presents a forward looking and more inclusive philosophy. However, as part of this recontextualization Stryker dismisses the concerns of 2nd wave cis-feminists about embracing transwomen as ascientifc and ungrounded, and that is not accurate, The 2nd wave POV was that transwomen grew up being identified and treated as male and therefore cannot connect to the pain which springs from the limitations visited on women by society at large. Certainly there are plenty of cis-male feminists, a penis and empathy for victims of inequity are not mutually exclusive. However, the no trans argument is not about feminism per se, but about creating safe spaces that are women-only to share in the impact of having lived in a world that limits women and which considers women only in the ways they are valued by men. Transwomen do not have the same lived experience as females assigned at birth. I don't feel the need to attend gynocentric gatherings (I went to the Michigan Womyn's festival once and found it ridiculous and cultish and also really boring) but that is me. Stryker dismisses this position entirely, advancing as a matter of fact that there is no distinction between transwomen and people assigned female at birth. I am just saying that is an opinion, not a scientific or legal fact. Stryker does this repeatedly, advances as fact things that are unproven, unprovable, or undecided, but Stryker also imparts great information about the history of trans and nonconforming people and about the current legal and policy issues to be addressed. She also makes good arguments for a road forward, I just wish she had advanced that material as opinion. An absolutely worthwhile and broadening read despite its spin! show less
Stryker is a good and almost conversational writer. This could not be more accessible. There is some very edifying historical information about trans life and gender pioneers in the 19th and 20th centuries, and the advances since show more entering the 21st. She also presents a good framework for transgender feminism, something I think most trans feminist writers have not done terribly well. By recontextualizing feminism as not being about a history or oppression she presents a forward looking and more inclusive philosophy. However, as part of this recontextualization Stryker dismisses the concerns of 2nd wave cis-feminists about embracing transwomen as ascientifc and ungrounded, and that is not accurate, The 2nd wave POV was that transwomen grew up being identified and treated as male and therefore cannot connect to the pain which springs from the limitations visited on women by society at large. Certainly there are plenty of cis-male feminists, a penis and empathy for victims of inequity are not mutually exclusive. However, the no trans argument is not about feminism per se, but about creating safe spaces that are women-only to share in the impact of having lived in a world that limits women and which considers women only in the ways they are valued by men. Transwomen do not have the same lived experience as females assigned at birth. I don't feel the need to attend gynocentric gatherings (I went to the Michigan Womyn's festival once and found it ridiculous and cultish and also really boring) but that is me. Stryker dismisses this position entirely, advancing as a matter of fact that there is no distinction between transwomen and people assigned female at birth. I am just saying that is an opinion, not a scientific or legal fact. Stryker does this repeatedly, advances as fact things that are unproven, unprovable, or undecided, but Stryker also imparts great information about the history of trans and nonconforming people and about the current legal and policy issues to be addressed. She also makes good arguments for a road forward, I just wish she had advanced that material as opinion. An absolutely worthwhile and broadening read despite its spin! show less
****.5
Originally published in 2008, I listened to the audiobook version of the revised 2017 edition, published early in the trump administration. As opposed to much recent social science work that I've come across, the writing is refreshingly clear, unpretentious, and largely avoids the weaselly and vacuous "woke" language that tends to taint the genre.
Before delving into the history, the book starts with an extended section on defining transgender terminology, which I found quite useful in show more understanding the evolution of the vocabulary and the changing underlying attitudes that influence their usage. It's primarily a history text, so there are lots of names and dates and places that can bog down the narrative, but there's plenty of context provided and explanations of why these events are important to keep it interesting.
The book is best for people [like me] who aren't widely read in the subject, but are interested in learning more about it. As interest in trans issues have moved from a few neighbourhoods in places like San Francisco and NYC and radical college campuses to the mainstream, it's important for everyone to get better informed, and this book is an excellent place to start. show less
Originally published in 2008, I listened to the audiobook version of the revised 2017 edition, published early in the trump administration. As opposed to much recent social science work that I've come across, the writing is refreshingly clear, unpretentious, and largely avoids the weaselly and vacuous "woke" language that tends to taint the genre.
Before delving into the history, the book starts with an extended section on defining transgender terminology, which I found quite useful in show more understanding the evolution of the vocabulary and the changing underlying attitudes that influence their usage. It's primarily a history text, so there are lots of names and dates and places that can bog down the narrative, but there's plenty of context provided and explanations of why these events are important to keep it interesting.
The book is best for people [like me] who aren't widely read in the subject, but are interested in learning more about it. As interest in trans issues have moved from a few neighbourhoods in places like San Francisco and NYC and radical college campuses to the mainstream, it's important for everyone to get better informed, and this book is an excellent place to start. show less
Well written and fascinating. I learned some things about the history of transgenderism that I had never heard before. Notably, cooperation among gay and lesbian advocates and transgendered individuals, until very recently was poor. Feminists also have been deeply split in their support for the transgender community, some adamantly support the belief that transgenderism is merely a social/moral issue and should not be tolerated.
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 28
- Also by
- 3
- Members
- 2,020
- Popularity
- #12,733
- Rating
- 4.2
- Reviews
- 20
- ISBNs
- 43
- Languages
- 2














