Kit Heyam

An eye-opening study of the history of gender nonconformity.

In this highly informative text, Heyam, a U.K.–based queer history activist and trans awareness trainer, tells a wide variety of pertinent stories that are often left out of the trans narrative. Many of the ideas that the author explores don’t fit cleanly inside our contemporary notions of trans identity, which is usually able to be verbally confirmed and often includes medical, social, and cultural transitions. Heyam makes the show more compelling argument that just because people in the past may not have had access to medical transition procedures or modern vocabulary to adequately discuss gender doesn’t mean their experiences outside the gender binary should be ignored. “To say sex and gender are both socially constructed,” writes the author, “isn’t to say they’re not real—like other social constructs, including race, money and crime, they have material and life-changing consequences for all of us—but it is to say there’s no innate reason we have to think about them in the way we do.” The author draws from a remarkable array of historical examples, expanding the definition of what we should consider trans history along the way. Among other eras and locales, Heyam takes us to ancient Egypt, the Edo period in Japan, and a World War II prisoner camp on the British Isles. With great sensitivity and care, they discuss the deleterious effects of European colonization over hundreds of years, the modern Western desire to separate gender and sexuality, and the intersex community. While clearly the work of a diligent historian, the text avoids feeling too dry and is a relatively accessible read. The author’s historical and topical range is impressive, and only a few of the sections are disjointed. Overall, the book will fascinate anyone interested in a subject that many readers likely misunderstand.

A capable, worthy demonstration of how the history of disrupting the gender binary is as long as human history itself.

-Kirkus Review show less

A revealing and illuminating history of gender and the ways it has been understood and experienced throughout history. The author takes case studies from all over the world and throughout recorded history to discover nuance in what is often an oversimplified issue.

Many of these stories and examples I had never heard of before, leaving me with many tantalizing areas for further study and exploration. Beyond the history itself, the author examines the prevailing cis bias of many historians show more and the pressure placed on trans historians to be "objective" and not let their own experiences color their research. The obvious double standard is identified and possible solutions are discussed.

This is a truly unique history that will reward any reader. show less

Heyam does an incredible job of acknowledging the problematic lens in which we view history. Most often, historians claim to be unbiased, but will not allow the possibility of queer interpretation. By viewing history with a queer lens, we not only have the opportunity to interrogate our own bias, but to explore how gender was viewed and understood in times and cultures unlike our own. Heyam also accentuates how misogyny, transphobia, and racism are inherently intertwined. To unravel one show more means to unravel it all. show less

Overall an interesting exploration of the diversity of gender and gender expression throughout history. It was written very respectfully in regards to telling the stories of the individuals featured without ascribing them identities or defining their experiences outside of what they’d explicitly claimed, which I appreciated. However, the amount of space spent on disclaimers on how we can’t assume, can’t know, shouldn’t define one way or another became frustrating as the book went on. show more While I understand the necessity of making this point, with a few exceptions (such as the chapter discussing spirituality’s relationships with gender) these disclaimers were all the same, repeated ad nauseam. It felt like the author did not trust the reader to ever understand that point. By the end, it seemed like more time was spent on cautioning and hedging than on the history itself. show less