
About the Author
Works by Peter H. Wood
Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion (Norton Library) (1974) 383 copies, 3 reviews
Powhatan's Mantle: Indians in the Colonial Southeast (Revised and Expanded Edition) (1989) — Editor — 46 copies
Created Equal: A Social and Political History of the United States, Brief Edition, Volume I (to 1877) (2005) 15 copies
Associated Works
Implicit Understandings: Observing, Reporting and Reflecting on the Encounters between Europeans and Other Peoples in the Early Modern Era (Studies in Comparative Early Modern… (1994) — Contributor — 46 copies, 1 review
In Resistance: Studies in African, Caribbean, and Afro-American History (1986) — Contributor — 14 copies
The Invisible War: African American Anti-Slavery Resistance from the Stono Rebellion through the Seminole Wars (2006) — Contributor — 13 copies
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Canonical name
- Wood, Peter H.
- Legal name
- Wood, Peter Hutchins
- Birthdate
- 1943
- Gender
- male
- Education
- Harvard University (BA|1964)
University of Oxford (BA|1966)
Harvard University (Ph.D|1972) - Occupations
- professor
historian - Organizations
- Duke University
University of Colorado at Boulder - Awards and honors
- Rhodes Scholar
James Harvey Robinson Prize (1984) - Relationships
- Fenn, Elizabeth A. (spouse)
- Nationality
- USA
- Birthplace
- St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Places of residence
- Longmont, Colorado, USA
Durham, North Carolina, USA - Associated Place (for map)
- USA
Members
Reviews
For anyone interested in a short introduction to the African diaspora in North America, I recommend Peter H. Wood's Strange New Land: Africans in Colonial America. The main text weighs in at less than 100 pages, but gives a fast-moving, substantive overview of the way colonial society became a slave society, and where the crucial turning points were. It will be a familiar story to some, but I think Wood's approach — combining big-picture perspective with individual lives — is refreshing. show more There's a good bibliography in the back, current through 2003.
Wood is the first author I've read who points out that African Americans, although often compared with immigrant groups, have deeper roots in America than most other Americans, as two-thirds of their ancestors arrived before 1776, and almost all of the rest were here by 1807, when Congress abolished the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Yet slavery and associated legal and cultural habits kept them alien to the white majority, even as that majority silently adopted elements of African American culture, without acknowledgement. (We're talking 17th century here, not jazz and Motown.)
I was intrigued with one counterfactual speculation: The history of the "Lost Colony" of Roanoke usually omits the fact that when Francis Drake arrived there in 1586, his reinforcements included liberated African and Indian slaves along with lots of captured Spanish goods and materiel. A storm wrecked most of his fleet and drowned these people. Had they survived, perhaps Roanoke, with such a mixed population, would have succeeded in a way that allowed less scope, later, for chattel slavery. As it happened, Drake returned to England, and the next, small, all-white contingent at Roanoke assimilated into surrounding Indian towns by 1590. By the time Jamestown got off the ground, the opportunity was lost.
Virginia and even Carolina (later divided into North and South Carolina) did afford some room for free black citizens for several generations, but they were too few to stop the gradual slide toward a racial caste system and perpetual, inheritable chattel slavery. Under that shadow, the memory of Roanoke was reduced to a story of the birth of Virginia Dare, the first native-born WASP — although she almost certainly ended her days as an Algonquian Indian. This book suggests that the real "lost colony" was the pre-racial one (antedating our long obsession with skin color) that just missed getting started in the summer of 1586.
Maybe it would have made a difference. Who knows? show less
Wood is the first author I've read who points out that African Americans, although often compared with immigrant groups, have deeper roots in America than most other Americans, as two-thirds of their ancestors arrived before 1776, and almost all of the rest were here by 1807, when Congress abolished the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Yet slavery and associated legal and cultural habits kept them alien to the white majority, even as that majority silently adopted elements of African American culture, without acknowledgement. (We're talking 17th century here, not jazz and Motown.)
I was intrigued with one counterfactual speculation: The history of the "Lost Colony" of Roanoke usually omits the fact that when Francis Drake arrived there in 1586, his reinforcements included liberated African and Indian slaves along with lots of captured Spanish goods and materiel. A storm wrecked most of his fleet and drowned these people. Had they survived, perhaps Roanoke, with such a mixed population, would have succeeded in a way that allowed less scope, later, for chattel slavery. As it happened, Drake returned to England, and the next, small, all-white contingent at Roanoke assimilated into surrounding Indian towns by 1590. By the time Jamestown got off the ground, the opportunity was lost.
Virginia and even Carolina (later divided into North and South Carolina) did afford some room for free black citizens for several generations, but they were too few to stop the gradual slide toward a racial caste system and perpetual, inheritable chattel slavery. Under that shadow, the memory of Roanoke was reduced to a story of the birth of Virginia Dare, the first native-born WASP — although she almost certainly ended her days as an Algonquian Indian. This book suggests that the real "lost colony" was the pre-racial one (antedating our long obsession with skin color) that just missed getting started in the summer of 1586.
Maybe it would have made a difference. Who knows? show less
The book is a scholarly, well documented description of Black culture and life in South Carolina from its founding to ~1740. During this time Blacks provided both skilled and unskilled labor, significantly contributing to the colony's success. As a scholarly book it was sometimes dry but interesting, nonetheless.
Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion (Norton Library) by Peter H. Wood
Read for a history class. More accurately, glanced.
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 16
- Also by
- 6
- Members
- 724
- Popularity
- #35,064
- Rating
- 4.0
- Reviews
- 4
- ISBNs
- 33
- Favorited
- 1











